Suppr超能文献

肾母细胞瘤全肺及腹部照射中调强放疗联合的剂量学优势

Dosimetric Advantage of Combined IMRT for Whole Lung and Abdomen Irradiation for Wilms Tumor.

作者信息

Chaballout Basil H, McComas Kyra N, Khattab Mohamed, Seymore Gabrielle P, Martinez Stephen K, Luo Guozhen, Kirschner Austin, Luo Leo Y

机构信息

University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, South Carolina.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Apr 27;9(8):101527. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101527. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In patients with Wilms tumor with lung metastases, a cardiac-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (CS-IMRT) technique is increasingly being adopted for whole lung irradiation. However, the standard technique for flank and whole abdomen radiation remains 2-dimensional anterioposterior (AP), and overlap at the junction between the whole lung CS-IMRT and abdominal AP fields can result in overdose to normal organs. Here, we compared the dosimetry of patients who received whole lung irradiation and flank or abdominal radiation therapy with CS-IMRT with AP abdominal field (IMRT-AP) versus CS-IMRT with IMRT abdominal field (combined IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the radiation plans of 2 patients with Wilms tumor who received CS-IMRT and flank or whole abdomen irradiation with a combined IMRT approach. Comparison IMRT-AP plans were generated with equivalent target coverage of 95% receiving the prescribed dose. Maximum doses to normal organs were compared at the junctional overlap.

RESULTS

Overlap at the junction between CS-IMRT and abdominal fields resulted in a significantly lower dose with combined IMRT plans compared with IMRT-AP plan. Differences in maximum doses (in cGy) to normal organs between combined IMRT versus IMRT-AP plans were most significant in the vertebral body (patient 1 = 1277 vs 2065; patient 2 = 1334 vs 2287), lungs (patient 1 = 1298 vs 2081; patient 2 = 1234 vs 1820), spinal cord (patient 1 = 1235 vs 1975; patient 2 = 1345 vs 2253), stomach (patient 1 = 1264 vs 1977; patient 2 = 1118 vs 2062), and liver (patient 1 = 1297 vs 1889; patient 2 = 1334 vs 2237).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined IMRT approach for Wilms patients who require whole lung and abdomen irradiation can provide more uniform dose distribution in the junction area and significantly lower doses to normal organs at the junctional overlap.

摘要

目的

在患有肺转移的肾母细胞瘤患者中,心脏保护调强放射治疗(CS-IMRT)技术越来越多地被用于全肺照射。然而,侧腹和全腹放射治疗的标准技术仍然是二维前后位(AP)照射,全肺CS-IMRT与腹部AP野之间的交界处重叠可能导致正常器官剂量过高。在此,我们比较了接受全肺照射以及侧腹或腹部放射治疗的患者,采用CS-IMRT联合AP腹部野(IMRT-AP)与CS-IMRT联合IMRT腹部野(联合IMRT)的剂量学情况。

方法和材料

我们回顾性分析了2例接受CS-IMRT以及联合IMRT方法进行侧腹或全腹照射的肾母细胞瘤患者的放射治疗计划。生成了等效靶区覆盖率为95%且接受规定剂量的对比IMRT-AP计划。在交界重叠处比较正常器官的最大剂量。

结果

与IMRT-AP计划相比,CS-IMRT与腹部野交界处的重叠在联合IMRT计划中导致剂量显著降低。联合IMRT与IMRT-AP计划相比,正常器官的最大剂量(以cGy为单位)差异在椎体(患者1 = 1277对2065;患者2 = 1334对2287)、肺(患者1 = 1298对2081;患者2 = 1234对1820)、脊髓(患者1 = 1235对1975;患者2 = 1345对2253)、胃(患者1 = 1264对1977;患者2 = 1118对2062)和肝脏(患者1 = 129对1889;患者2 = 1334对2237)方面最为显著。

结论

对于需要全肺和腹部照射的肾母细胞瘤患者,联合IMRT方法可在交界区域提供更均匀的剂量分布,并在交界重叠处显著降低正常器官的剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f674/11233888/cc16f640eb60/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验