Banks Laura, Randhawa Varinder K, Colella Tracey J F, Dhanvantari Savita, Connelly Kim A, Robinson Lisa, Mak Susanna, Ouzounian Maral, Mulvagh Sharon L, Straus Sharon, Allan Katherine, Yin Yip Cindy Ying, Graham Michelle M
Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Ontario, Canada.
CJC Open. 2021 Jan 21;3(5):627-630. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.12.027. eCollection 2021 May.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has exposed a work-life (im)balance that has been present but not openly discussed in medicine, surgery, and science for decades. The pandemic has exposed inequities in existing institutional structure and policies concerning clinical workload, research productivity, and/or teaching excellence inadvertently privileging those who do not have significant caregiving responsibilities or those who have the resources to pay for their management.
We sought to identify the challenges facing multidisciplinary faculty and trainees with dependents, and highlight a number of possible strategies to address challenges in work-life (im)balance.
To date, there are no Canadian-based data to quantify the physical and mental effect of COVID-19 on health care workers, multidisciplinary faculty, and trainees. As the pandemic evolves, formal strategies should be discussed with an intersectional lens to promote equity in the workforce, including (but not limited to): (1) the inclusion of broad representation (including equal representation of women and other marginalized persons) in institutional-based pandemic response and recovery planning and decision-making; (2) an evaluation (eg, institutional-led survey) of the effect of the pandemic on work-life balance; (3) the establishment of formal dialogue (eg, workshops, training, and media campaigns) to normalize coexistence of work and caregiving responsibilities and to remove stigma of gender roles; (4) a reevaluation of workload and promotion reviews; and (5) the development of formal mentorship programs to support faculty and trainees.
We believe that a multistrategy approach needs to be considered by stakeholders (including policy-makers, institutions, and individuals) to create sustainable working conditions during and beyond this pandemic.
持续的新冠疫情暴露了一种工作与生活(不)平衡的状况,这种状况在医学、外科和科学界已经存在了几十年,但一直没有公开讨论过。疫情无意中暴露了现有机构结构和政策在临床工作量、研究生产力和/或教学卓越性方面的不平等,这些不平等使那些没有重大照顾责任的人或有资源支付管理费用的人享有特权。
我们试图确定有家属的多学科教员和学员面临的挑战,并强调一些应对工作与生活(不)平衡挑战的可能策略。
迄今为止,加拿大没有数据来量化新冠疫情对医护人员、多学科教员和学员身心健康的影响。随着疫情的发展,应从交叉视角讨论正式策略,以促进劳动力队伍的公平性,包括(但不限于):(1)在基于机构的疫情应对、恢复规划和决策中纳入广泛代表性(包括女性和其他边缘化人群的平等代表权);(2)评估(例如,由机构主导的调查)疫情对工作与生活平衡的影响;(3)建立正式对话(例如,研讨会、培训和媒体宣传活动),使工作和照顾责任的共存常态化,并消除性别角色的污名化;(4)重新评估工作量和晋升评审;(5)制定正式的指导计划,以支持教员和学员。
我们认为,利益相关者(包括政策制定者、机构和个人)需要考虑采用多策略方法,以便在本次疫情期间及之后创造可持续的工作条件。