• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全缝线锚钉固定强度的扭矩差异影响:生物力学分析

The Effect of Torque Differences for All-Suture Anchor Fixation Strength: A Biomechanical Analysis.

作者信息

Lacheta Lucca, Miles Jon, Douglass Brenton, Millett Peter

机构信息

Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.

Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charitè Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb 25;3(2):e549-e554. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.12.008. eCollection 2021 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.asmr.2020.12.008
PMID:34027468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8129443/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the biomechanical influence of differential loading of suture strands (torque) on the fixation strength of knotted and knotless all-suture anchors.

METHODS

The biomechanical strength of 48 all-suture anchors was evaluated for 4 conditions in polyurethane foam blocks: (1) 12 knotted all-suture anchors loaded proportionately, (2) 12 knotted all-suture anchors with 1 suture strand bearing 50% of total force (partial torque), (3) 12 knotted all-suture anchors with 1 strand fixated and the other loaded (full torque), and (4) 12 knotless all-suture anchors with the loop kept open via a fixed rod. Force for 1 mm and 2 mm of displacement and ultimate failure load were assessed.

RESULTS

For 1 mm of displacement, groups 2, 3, and 4 showed significantly lower forces than group 1 (all < .001), with no statistically significant difference between groups 2 and 3 ( = .516); for 2 mm of displacement, all groups showed significantly lower forces than group 1 ( < .001), which positively correlated with applied torque. No differences in the mean ultimate loads observed between testing groups 1, 2, and 4 were noted, with 93.3 ± 3.8 N, 91.4 ± 4.7 N, and 92.6 ± 5.6 N, respectively; however, group 3 exhibited a significantly lower mean ultimate load (62.3 ± 1.7 N) than all other groups ( < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ultimate failure load of knotted and knotless all-suture anchor fixation was partially affected by loading differentials between strands in this validated foam block model. Differential loading of knotted all-suture anchor fixation presented greater initial displacement when compared with symmetrically loaded knotted all-suture anchors. Despite an initial increase in displacement, knotless all-suture anchors showed similar ultimate failure loads to knotted all-suture anchors with strands loaded equally.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The role of suture strand loading imbalance on anchor fixation is variable and should be considered during placement and fixation of the repair constructs in a clinical setting.

摘要

目的

研究缝线股线的差异加载(扭矩)对打结和无结全缝线锚钉固定强度的生物力学影响。

方法

在聚氨酯泡沫块中对48个全缝线锚钉在4种条件下的生物力学强度进行评估:(1)12个打结全缝线锚钉按比例加载;(2)12个打结全缝线锚钉,其中1根缝线股线承受总力的50%(部分扭矩);(3)12个打结全缝线锚钉,1根股线固定而另一根加载(全扭矩);(4)12个无结全缝线锚钉,通过固定杆使环保持打开状态。评估1毫米和2毫米位移时的力以及极限破坏载荷。

结果

对于1毫米位移,第2、3和4组的力显著低于第1组(均P <.001),第2组和第3组之间无统计学显著差异(P =.516);对于2毫米位移,所有组的力均显著低于第1组(P <.001),且与施加的扭矩呈正相关。第1、2和4测试组之间观察到的平均极限载荷无差异,分别为93.3±3.8牛、91.4±4.7牛和92.6±5.6牛;然而,第3组的平均极限载荷(62.3±1.7牛)显著低于所有其他组(P <.001)。

结论

在这个经过验证的泡沫块模型中,打结和无结全缝线锚钉固定的极限破坏载荷部分受股线间加载差异的影响。与对称加载的打结全缝线锚钉相比,打结全缝线锚钉固定的差异加载呈现出更大的初始位移。尽管位移最初有所增加,但无结全缝线锚钉的极限破坏载荷与股线均匀加载的打结全缝线锚钉相似。

临床意义

缝线股线加载不平衡对锚钉固定的作用是可变的,在临床环境中修复结构的放置和固定过程中应予以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f56/8129443/683a6e258cff/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f56/8129443/3101c1de6337/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f56/8129443/9054ccc3866b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f56/8129443/683a6e258cff/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f56/8129443/3101c1de6337/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f56/8129443/9054ccc3866b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f56/8129443/683a6e258cff/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Torque Differences for All-Suture Anchor Fixation Strength: A Biomechanical Analysis.全缝线锚钉固定强度的扭矩差异影响:生物力学分析
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb 25;3(2):e549-e554. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.12.008. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Biomechanical Evaluation of Knotless and Knotted All-Suture Anchor Repair Constructs in 4 Bankart Repair Configurations.四种 Bankart 修复构型中无结和打结全缝线锚修复结构的生物力学评估。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1523-1532. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.046. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
3
Biomechanical Analysis of Anteroinferior Bankart Repair Anchor Types.前下 Bankart 修复锚钉类型的生物力学分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Aug;51(10):2642-2649. doi: 10.1177/03635465231180621. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
4
Biomechanical Comparison of Knotless All-Suture Anchors and Knotted All-Suture Anchors in Type II SLAP Lesions: A Cadaveric Study.II型SLAP损伤中无结全缝线锚钉与有结全缝线锚钉的生物力学比较:一项尸体研究
Arthroscopy. 2020 Aug;36(8):2094-2102. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.026. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
5
Proximal Hamstring Repair: A Biomechanical Analysis of Variable Suture Anchor Constructs.腘绳肌近端修复:可变缝线锚定结构的生物力学分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Feb 5;7(2):2325967118824149. doi: 10.1177/2325967118824149. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
Biomechanical comparison of a knotless suture anchor with standard suture anchor in the repair of type II SLAP tears.无结缝线锚钉与标准缝线锚钉在Ⅱ型SLAP损伤修复中的生物力学比较
Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr;25(4):348-54. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.10.019. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
7
Remplissage Using Interconnected Knotless Anchors: Superior Biomechanical Properties to a Knotted Technique?使用互联无结锚定填充:优于打结技术的生物力学性能?
Arthroscopy. 2018 Nov;34(11):2954-2959. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
8
Biomechanical analysis of arthroscopically assisted latissimus dorsi transfer fixation for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears-Knotless versus knotted anchors.关节镜辅助下背阔肌转移固定修复不可修复的肩袖后上部分撕裂的生物力学分析——无结锚钉与有结锚钉的比较
J Orthop Res. 2021 Oct;39(10):2234-2242. doi: 10.1002/jor.24963. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
9
A biomechanical analysis of anterior Bankart repair using suture anchors.使用缝合锚钉进行前盂唇修复的生物力学分析
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1405-12. doi: 10.1177/0363546509359069. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
10
Knotted versus knotless suture bridge repair of the achilles tendon insertion: a biomechanical study.跟腱止点的带结与无结缝线桥修复:一项生物力学研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2727-33. doi: 10.1177/0363546514549004. Epub 2014 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study.全缝线锚钉大小和钻孔角度对猪模型下胸肌二头肌肌腱固定术失效负荷的影响:一项生物力学研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 23;25(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07503-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The Clinical and Biomechanical Performance of All-Suture Anchors: A Systematic Review.全缝线锚钉的临床及生物力学性能:一项系统评价
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 May 28;2(3):e263-e275. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.02.007. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Biomechanical Evaluation of Knotless and Knotted All-Suture Anchor Repair Constructs in 4 Bankart Repair Configurations.四种 Bankart 修复构型中无结和打结全缝线锚修复结构的生物力学评估。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1523-1532. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.046. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
3
Conventional rotator cuff versus all-suture anchors-A biomechanical study focusing on the insertion angle in an unlimited cyclic model.
传统肩袖与全缝线锚钉的比较-在无限循环模型中关注置入角度的生物力学研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 27;14(11):e0225648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225648. eCollection 2019.
4
Biomechanical Comparison of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Onlay Techniques.胸大肌下肱二头肌肌腱固定覆盖技术的生物力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Oct 15;7(10):2325967119876276. doi: 10.1177/2325967119876276. eCollection 2019 Oct.
5
Arthroscopic Knotless, Tensionable All-Suture Anchor Bankart Repair.关节镜下无结、可张紧全缝线锚钉修复Bankart损伤
Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Jun 2;8(6):e647-e653. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2019.02.010. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
Biomechanical Comparison of Onlay Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: All-Suture Anchors Versus Titanium Suture Anchors.骨外科学中肌腱修复的生物力学比较:全缝线锚钉与钛缝线锚钉的对比。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Aug;47(10):2478-2483. doi: 10.1177/0363546519860489. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
7
Editorial Commentary: All-Suture Shoulder Glenoid Anchors: Can We Adequately Tension Them or Knot?社论评论:全缝线肩盂锚钉:我们能充分拉紧或打结吗?
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jul;35(7):1960-1963. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.02.008.
8
Cyclic and Load-to-Failure Properties of All-Suture Anchors in Human Cadaveric Shoulder Glenoid Bone.全缝线锚钉在人体肩盂骨中的循环和失效负载特性。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jul;35(7):1954-1959.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
9
Pullout Strength of All-Suture Anchors: Effect of the Insertion and Traction Angle-A Biomechanical Study.全缝线锚钉拔出强度:进钉角度和牵引角度的影响——一项生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Oct;34(10):2784-2795. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
10
Cyclic and Load to Failure Properties of All-Suture Anchors in Synthetic Acetabular and Glenoid Cancellous Bone.全缝线锚钉在人工合成髋臼和肩胛盂松质骨中的循环及破坏载荷特性
Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):977-985.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.11.022. Epub 2017 Jan 26.