• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用前伸牙合方法、曲面断层片和侧位头颅定位片评估矢状髁导斜度:一项对比研究。

Assessment of Sagittal Condylar Guidance with Protrusive Inter-occlusal Method, Panoramic Radiographs, and Lateral Cephalogram: A Comparative Study.

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.

Department of Dentistry, Nalanda Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):47-50.

PMID:34028362
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Condylar guidance can be determined using the clinical and radiographic methods. The present study was conducted to determine condylar guidance using the protrusive interocclusal wax method, panoramic radiographs, and lateral cephalogram.

AIMS

The aim of the study was to compare the correlation between sagittal condylar guidance with protrusive interocclusal method, panoramic radiographs, and lateral cephalogram.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was conducted on 82 dentulous subjects (males 41, females 41). In all subjects, interocclusal registration values and condylar guidance values were measured using panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD protrusive interocclusal registration value on the left side was 34.01 ± 1.2 mm and 34.08 ± 1.4 mm on the right side. The panoramic radiographs showed 35.12 ± 1.6 mm on the left side and 35.16 ± 1.7 mm on the right side. The mean ± SD protrusive interocclusal registration values on the left side was 34.01 ± 1.2 mm on the left side and 34.08 ± 1.4 mm on the right side. Lateral cephalogram showed 34.35 ± 1.3 mm on the left side and 34.67 ± 1.6 mm on the right side. There was a significant difference between the methods ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Sagittal condylar guidance can be evaluated using protrusive interocclusal method. Along with it, other methods such as panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalogram may also be used for recording condylar guidance.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Lateral cephalogram and panoramic radiographs may be reliable in determining condylar guidance, which can be used in orthodontic treatment planning.

摘要

背景

髁突引导关系可以通过临床和影像学方法来确定。本研究旨在通过前伸牙合间蜡记录法、全景片和侧位头颅定位片来确定髁突引导关系。

目的

本研究旨在比较前伸牙合间蜡记录法、全景片和侧位头颅定位片与矢状向髁突引导关系的相关性。

材料和方法

本研究共纳入 82 名有牙颌患者(男 41 名,女 41 名)。所有患者均采用全景片和侧位头颅定位片测量牙合间记录值和髁突引导关系值。

结果

左侧前伸牙合间记录值的平均值 ± 标准差为 34.01 ± 1.2mm,右侧为 34.08 ± 1.4mm。全景片显示左侧为 35.12 ± 1.6mm,右侧为 35.16 ± 1.7mm。左侧前伸牙合间记录值的平均值 ± 标准差为 34.01 ± 1.2mm,右侧为 34.08 ± 1.4mm。侧位头颅定位片显示左侧为 34.35 ± 1.3mm,右侧为 34.67 ± 1.6mm。各方法之间存在显著差异(<0.05)。

结论

前伸牙合间记录法可用于评估矢状向髁突引导关系,此外,还可以使用全景片和侧位头颅定位片等其他方法来记录髁突引导关系。

临床意义

侧位头颅定位片和全景片在确定髁突引导关系方面可能具有可靠性,可用于正畸治疗计划。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Sagittal Condylar Guidance with Protrusive Inter-occlusal Method, Panoramic Radiographs, and Lateral Cephalogram: A Comparative Study.采用前伸牙合方法、曲面断层片和侧位头颅定位片评估矢状髁导斜度:一项对比研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):47-50.
2
Comparative analysis of sagittal condylar guidance by protrusive interocclusal records with panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiographs in dentulous population: A clinico-radiographic study.无牙颌人群中通过前伸牙合记录与全景片和侧位头影测量片对髁突矢状向引导的对比分析:一项临床影像学研究
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Apr-Jun;16(2):148-53. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.179322.
3
Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study.髁突导向:前伸牙合记录与曲面体层片影像之间的相关性:一项初步研究。
J Prosthodont. 2012 Apr;21(3):181-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00811.x. Epub 2012 Feb 19.
4
A clinico-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans.一项通过前伸牙合间记录和全景X线影像对人类髁突矢状向引导进行的临床影像学分析。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Oct;3(4):383-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.107419.
5
Sagittal condylar guidance angle measurement methods: A systematic review.矢状髁导角测量方法:系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jul;132(1):81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.017. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
6
Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An study.三种不同的咬合记录材料在半可调式颌架上获得的髁导斜度与有牙患者数字全景片的对比评估:一项 研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Oct-Dec;21(4):397-404. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_239_21.
7
A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.一项比较研究,旨在评估两种市售的全可调式和半可调式牙合架之间髁突导向值的差异:一项临床研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;22(6):880. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.94695.
8
Comparison of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Determined by Panoramic Radiographs to the One Determined by Conventional Methods Using Lateral Interocclusal Records in the Saudi Arabian Population.在沙特阿拉伯人群中,比较全景X线片确定的髁突矢状向引导与使用侧方牙合记录的传统方法确定的髁突矢状向引导。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019 Nov 4;9(6):597-604. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_11_19. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
9
Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.在有牙个体中,通过临床方法和锥形束计算机断层扫描获得的矢状髁导曲线的对比评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 May;125(5):753-757. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.033. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients.比较两种无牙颌患者牙尖交错位记录材料记录下颌前伸髁导斜度准确性的研究。
Ann Afr Med. 2023 Jul-Sep;22(3):316-320. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_70_22.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of accuracy between protrusive interocclusal record and horizontal condylar guidance angle recording methods in dentulous patients.在有牙患者中,对伸颌记录与水平髁导记录方法之间准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024 Jan 1;24(1):3-14. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_382_23. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
Evaluation of accuracy between extraoral Gothic arch tracing and various other methods assessing horizontal condylar guidance angle in completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评估完全无牙患者外哥特式弓描记与其他各种方法评估水平髁突引导角的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Oct-Dec;23(4):322-334. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_216_23.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Angles Measured Using Arcon and Non-Arcon Articulators and Panoramic Radiographs-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用Arcon和非Arcon牙合架及全景X线片测量髁突引导角的比较评价——一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Life (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;13(6):1352. doi: 10.3390/life13061352.