• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以种族正义为名:为什么生物伦理学应该关注环境毒素。

In the Name of Racial Justice: Why Bioethics Should Care about Environmental Toxins.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 May;51(3):23-26. doi: 10.1002/hast.1251.

DOI:10.1002/hast.1251
PMID:34028819
Abstract

Facilities that emit hazardous toxins, such as toxic landfills, oil refineries, and chemical plants, are disproportionately located in predominantly Black, Latinx, and Indigenous neighborhoods. Environmental injustices like these threaten just distribution of health itself, including access to health that is not dependent on having the right skin color, living in the right neighborhood, or making the right amount of money. Facilities that emit environmental toxins wrongly make people's race, ethnicity, income, and neighborhood essential to who is allowed to breathe clean air and drink clean water, and thus, who is allowed to be healthy. This can be seen in the environmental crises in Louisiana; Mississippi; Houston, Texas; and Flint, Michigan. Since bioethics purports to concern itself with the principle of justice as applied to individuals and increasingly to populations, the field ought to concern itself more with environmental injustice.

摘要

排放危险毒素的设施,如有毒垃圾填埋场、炼油厂和化工厂,不成比例地分布在以黑人和拉丁裔及原住民为主的社区。这些环境不公正现象威胁着健康的公平分配,包括获得不依赖于正确肤色、居住在正确社区或赚取正确金额的健康的权利。排放环境毒素的设施错误地将人们的种族、族裔、收入和社区视为谁有权呼吸清洁空气和饮用水的关键因素,因此,谁有权保持健康。路易斯安那州、密西西比州、德克萨斯州休斯顿和密歇根州弗林特的环境危机就可以看到这一点。由于生命伦理学声称关注适用于个人的正义原则,并且越来越关注人口,该领域应该更加关注环境不公正。

相似文献

1
In the Name of Racial Justice: Why Bioethics Should Care about Environmental Toxins.以种族正义为名:为什么生物伦理学应该关注环境毒素。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 May;51(3):23-26. doi: 10.1002/hast.1251.
2
Bioethics, (Funding) Priorities, and the Perpetuation of Injustice.生物伦理学、(资金)优先事项与不公正的持续存在。
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jan;22(1):6-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1867934. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
3
Environmental justice and allergic disease: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Environmental Exposure and Respiratory Health Committee and the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee.环境正义与过敏性疾病:美国过敏、哮喘和免疫学会环境暴露与呼吸健康委员会和多样性、公平和包容委员会的一份工作报告。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Mar;151(3):656-670. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.025. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
4
The Bioethics of Environmental Injustice: Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Implications of Unhealthy Environments.环境不公正的生物伦理学:不健康环境的伦理、法律和临床影响
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Mar;24(3):9-17. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2201192. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
5
Proximity to extremely hazardous substances for people with disabilities: A case study in Houston, Texas.残疾人与极度危险物质的接近程度:德克萨斯州休斯顿的案例研究。
Disabil Health J. 2019 Jan;12(1):121-125. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
6
Addressing Anti-Black Racism in Bioethics: Responding to the Call.解决生物伦理学中的反黑种族主义:回应号召。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Mar;52 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3-S11. doi: 10.1002/hast.1360.
7
Environmental justice and the health of children.环境正义与儿童健康。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;77(2):178-87. doi: 10.1002/msj.20173.
8
Expanding health justice to consider the environment: how can bioethics avoid reinforcing epistemic injustice?拓展健康正义的视野以考虑环境因素:生物伦理学如何避免强化认识正义的缺失?
J Med Ethics. 2023 Sep;49(9):642-648. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108458. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
9
Concepts for Studying Urban Environmental Justice.研究城市环境正义的概念。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Mar;4(1):61-67. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0123-6.
10
Environmental victims: environmental injustice issues that threaten the health of children living in poverty.环境受害者:环境不公正问题威胁着贫困儿童的健康。
Rev Environ Health. 2011;26(3):141-7. doi: 10.1515/reveh.2011.021.

引用本文的文献

1
Prenatal exposure to persistent and non-persistent chemical mixtures and associations with adverse birth outcomes in the Atlanta African American Maternal-Child Cohort.产前暴露于持久性和非持久性化学混合物与亚特兰大非裔美国母婴队列不良出生结局的关联。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;34(4):570-580. doi: 10.1038/s41370-023-00530-4. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
2
Black Bioethics in the Age of Black Lives Matter.“黑人的命也是命”时代的黑人生物伦理学
J Med Humanit. 2023 Jun;44(2):251-267. doi: 10.1007/s10912-023-09783-4. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
3
Study the forest, not only the trees: Environmental exposures, not genomes, generate most health disparities.
研究森林,而非仅树木:造成大多数健康差异的是环境暴露,而非基因组。
Front Genet. 2022 Aug 19;13:817899. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.817899. eCollection 2022.
4
Addressing Anti-Black Racism in Bioethics: Responding to the Call.解决生物伦理学中的反黑种族主义:回应号召。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Mar;52 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3-S11. doi: 10.1002/hast.1360.