Suppr超能文献

西妥昔单抗联合顺铂与紫杉醇单独或联合治疗头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机试验。

Efficacy and Safety of Cetuximab Plus Cisplatin Alone or in Combination With Paclitaxel in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Department of Chemotherapy, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Department of Stomatology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:1073274821997444. doi: 10.1177/1073274821997444.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical usefulness of cetuximab and cisplatin alone or in combination with paclitaxel as the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODOLOGY

Three hundred patients with confirmed HNSCC from 20 different hospitals were included in this study. Patients in group I underwent a 2-hour infusion of 400 mg/m cetuximab (day 1), followed by a 1-hour infusion of 250 mg/m cetuximab weekly and 1-hour infusion of 100 mg/m cisplatin (days 1 and 21) per treatment cycle. Patients in group II were treated with a combination of cetuximab, cisplatin, and paclitaxel. Patients received 6 cycles of 175 mg/m paclitaxel given on days 1 and 21. The primary outcome of the study was progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) were the secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

The median PFS was 5 months and 8 months for patients in groups I and II, respectively (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.78; > 0.05). Similarly, we found no significant differences in OS between the 2 groups (median OS, 13 vs. 11 months, respectively; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42-1.43; = 0.198). Moreover, we observed no significant difference in ORR between the 2 groups (ORR, 63.3% vs 69.9%, respectively; HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.36-1.67; = 0.231).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of paclitaxel with cetuximab and cisplatin did not improve patient outcomes compared to cetuximab plus cisplatin alone. Therefore, the 2-drug regimen could be used as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估西妥昔单抗联合顺铂与单用西妥昔单抗和顺铂作为复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者一线治疗的临床疗效。

方法

本研究共纳入来自 20 家不同医院的 300 例经确诊的 HNSCC 患者。其中,I 组患者接受西妥昔单抗 400mg/m2,2 小时输注(第 1 天),然后每周 1 小时输注西妥昔单抗 250mg/m2,每治疗周期第 1 和第 21 天 1 小时输注顺铂 100mg/m2。II 组患者接受西妥昔单抗、顺铂和紫杉醇联合治疗。患者接受紫杉醇 175mg/m2,第 1 和第 21 天,1 小时输注,共 6 个周期。研究的主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS);总生存期(OS)和客观缓解率(ORR)为次要终点。

结果

I 组和 II 组患者的中位 PFS 分别为 5 个月和 8 个月(HR,0.93;95%CI,0.85-1.78;>0.05)。同样,两组患者的 OS 无显著差异(中位 OS,分别为 13 个月和 11 个月;HR,0.67;95%CI,0.42-1.43;=0.198)。此外,两组患者的 ORR 也无显著差异(ORR,分别为 63.3%和 69.9%;HR,0.87;95%CI,0.36-1.67;=0.231)。

结论

与单用西妥昔单抗和顺铂相比,紫杉醇联合西妥昔单抗和顺铂并未改善患者的预后。因此,对于复发性或转移性 HNSCC 患者,两药方案可作为一线治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc6c/8204453/703031fe4e5c/10.1177_1073274821997444-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验