• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导管与静脉比对外周静脉置管成功率的影响:一项事后分析。

The impact of the catheter to vein ratio on peripheral intravenous cannulation success, a post-hoc analyses.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Department of Science and Technology in Anesthesia Nursing Practice, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 24;16(5):e0252166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252166. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252166
PMID:34029356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8143382/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intravenous cannulation is usually the first procedure performed in modern healthcare, although establishing peripheral intravenous access is challenging in some patients. The impact of the ratio between venous diameter and the size of the inserted catheter (catheter to vein ratio, CVR) on the first attempt success rate can be of added value in clinical. This study tries to give insight into the consideration that must be made when selecting the target vein and the type of catheter, and proved the null hypothesis that an optimal CVR would not be associated with increased first attempt cannulation success.

METHODS

This was a post-hoc analyses on adult patients admitted for peripheral intravenous cannulation. Intravenous cannulation was performed according to practice guidelines, by applying the traditional landmark approach. The CVR was calculated afterwards for each individual patient by dividing the external diameter of the inserted catheter by the diameter of the target vein, which was multiplied by 100%.

RESULTS

In total, 610 patients were included. The median CVR was 0.39 (0.15) in patients with a successful first attempt, whereas patients with an unsuccessful first attempt had a median CVR of 0.55 (0.20) (P<0.001). The optimal cut-off point of the CVR was 0.41. First attempt cannulation was successful in 92% of patients with a CVR<0.41, whereas as those with a CVR>0.41 had a first attempt success rate of 65% (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This first introduction of the CVR in relation to cannulation success should be further investigated. Although, measuring the venous diameter or detection of a vein with a specific diameter prior to cannulation may increase first attempt cannulation success.

摘要

背景

静脉穿刺通常是现代医疗保健中进行的第一步,但在某些患者中建立外周静脉通路具有挑战性。静脉直径与插入导管大小之间的比值(导管与静脉比,CVR)对首次尝试成功率的影响在临床中可能具有附加价值。本研究试图深入了解在选择目标静脉和导管类型时必须考虑的因素,并证明了无效假设,即最佳 CVR 不会与增加首次尝试置管成功率相关。

方法

这是一项对成人患者进行外周静脉穿刺的回顾性分析。静脉穿刺按照实践指南进行,采用传统的地标方法。然后,为每位患者计算 CVR,即将插入导管的外径除以目标静脉的直径,再乘以 100%。

结果

共纳入 610 例患者。首次尝试成功的患者的 CVR 中位数为 0.39(0.15),而首次尝试不成功的患者的 CVR 中位数为 0.55(0.20)(P<0.001)。CVR 的最佳截断值为 0.41。CVR<0.41 的患者首次尝试置管成功率为 92%,而 CVR>0.41 的患者首次尝试置管成功率为 65%(P<0.001)。

结论

首次介绍 CVR 与置管成功率的关系,应进一步研究。尽管在置管前测量静脉直径或检测特定直径的静脉可能会增加首次尝试置管成功率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/317b/8143382/9c649fb202c3/pone.0252166.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/317b/8143382/3bf27d87bd73/pone.0252166.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/317b/8143382/9c649fb202c3/pone.0252166.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/317b/8143382/3bf27d87bd73/pone.0252166.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/317b/8143382/9c649fb202c3/pone.0252166.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of the catheter to vein ratio on peripheral intravenous cannulation success, a post-hoc analyses.导管与静脉比对外周静脉置管成功率的影响:一项事后分析。
PLoS One. 2021 May 24;16(5):e0252166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252166. eCollection 2021.
2
The impact of a notched peripheral intravenous catheter on the first attempt success rate in hospitalized adults: Block-randomized trial.带切痕的外周静脉留置针对住院成人首次穿刺成功率的影响:随机分组试验。
J Vasc Access. 2022 Mar;23(2):295-303. doi: 10.1177/1129729821990217. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
3
A novel technique of axillary vein puncture involving peripherally inserted central venous catheters for a small basilic vein.一种涉及经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管用于小贵要静脉的腋静脉穿刺新技术。
J Vasc Access. 2018 May;19(3):311-315. doi: 10.1177/1129729818757974. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
4
Effectiveness of ultrasonography for peripheral catheter insertion and catheter failure prevention in visible and palpable veins.超声检查在可见和可触及静脉中进行外周静脉导管插入及预防导管失败的有效性。
J Vasc Access. 2023 Jan;24(1):14-21. doi: 10.1177/11297298211022078. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
5
A new infraclavicular landmark-based approach to the axillary vein as an alternative method of central venous cannulation.一种基于锁骨下新标志的腋静脉穿刺方法,作为中心静脉置管的替代方法。
J Vasc Access. 2016 May 7;17(3):273-8. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000504. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
6
Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access.急诊科静脉穿刺困难患者的超声引导下肱静脉和贵要静脉置管
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Dec;34(6):711-4. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70095-8.
7
Clinical use of electrical stimulation with the Veinplicity device and its effect on the first attempt success rate of peripheral intravenous cannulation: A non-randomized clinical trial.使用Veinplicity设备进行电刺激的临床应用及其对外周静脉穿刺首次尝试成功率的影响:一项非随机临床试验。
J Vasc Access. 2019 Nov;20(6):621-629. doi: 10.1177/1129729819838093. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Catheter to vein ratio and risk of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-associated thrombosis according to diagnostic group: a retrospective cohort study.导管与静脉比与外周置入中心静脉导管(PICC)相关性血栓形成的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 5;11(7):e045895. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045895.
9
Difficult peripheral venous access: clinical evaluation of a catheter inserted with the Seldinger method under ultrasound guidance.外周静脉穿刺困难:超声引导下采用Seldinger法置入导管的临床评估
J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):823-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.04.022. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
A comparison of first-attempt cannulation success of peripheral venous catheter systems with and without wings and injection ports in surgical patients-a randomized trial.在外科手术患者中比较带翼和不带翼及注射端口的外周静脉导管系统首次置管成功率的随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Mar 31;22(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01631-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Paced breathing causes tonic change rather than phasic modulation of superficial venous diameter.定频呼吸引起的是浅表静脉直径的强直性变化,而非相位性调节。
J Physiol Anthropol. 2025 May 16;44(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40101-025-00392-9.
2
Mind the GAHP: A novel protocol for improved vascular access in the hypotensive patient.留意GAHP:一种改善低血压患者血管通路的新方案。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jul 16;19:100714. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100714. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
An Improved Definition and SAFE Rule for Predicting Difficult Intravascular Access (DIVA) in Hospitalized Adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the dilatory effect of three strategies on peripheral veins of the upper extremity in adults.三种策略对上肢外周静脉扩张效果的比较。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Aug;87(8):864-872. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15291-5. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
2
Translation and Validation of the Modified A-DIVA Scale to European Portuguese: Difficult Intravenous Access Scale for Adult Patients.将改良 A-DIVA 量表翻译成欧洲葡萄牙语:成人患者困难静脉通路量表的翻译和验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 17;17(20):7552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207552.
3
The Modified A-DIVA Scale as a Predictive Tool for Prospective Identification of Adult Patients at Risk of a Difficult Intravenous Access: A Multicenter Validation Study.
一种改进的成人住院患者血管内通路困难(DIVA)预测的定义和 SAFE 规则。
J Infus Nurs. 2024;47(2):96-107. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000535. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
4
Nurses' Involvement in the Development and Usability Assessment of an Innovative Peripheral Intravenous Catheterisation Pack: A Mix-Method Study.护士参与创新型外周静脉置管包的开发和可用性评估:混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711130.
改良A-DIVA量表作为前瞻性识别有困难静脉穿刺风险成年患者的预测工具:一项多中心验证研究
J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 26;8(2):144. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020144.
4
Historical (retrospective) cohort studies and other epidemiologic study designs in perinatal research.围生期研究中的历史(回顾性)队列研究和其他流行病学研究设计。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):447-450. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.044. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
5
A study design to identify associations: Study design: observational cohort studies.一项旨在确定关联的研究设计:研究设计:观察性队列研究。
BJOG. 2018 Dec;125(13):1776. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15203. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
6
Pain upon inserting a peripheral intravenous catheter: Size does not matter.插入外周静脉导管时的疼痛:尺寸并非关键因素。
J Vasc Access. 2018 May;19(3):258-265. doi: 10.1177/1129729817747531. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
7
Peripheral intravenous cannulation: protecting patients and nurses.外周静脉置管:保护患者和护士。
Br J Nurs. 2017 Apr 27;26(8):S28-S33. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.8.S28.
8
Needle stick and sharps injuries: practice update.
Nurs Stand. 2012 May 16;26(37):49-58. doi: 10.7748/ns.26.37.49.s54.
9
The 2016 Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice.《2016年静脉输液治疗实践标准》
Home Healthc Now. 2017 Jan;35(1):10-18. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000481.
10
Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland: Safe vascular access 2016.大不列颠及爱尔兰麻醉医师协会:2016年安全血管通路
Anaesthesia. 2016 May;71(5):573-85. doi: 10.1111/anae.13360. Epub 2016 Feb 17.