University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Department of Operating Room, Ankara, Turkey.
University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Faculty of Nursing, Department of Surgical Nursing, Ankara, Turkey.
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Nov;49(11):1376-1383. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 23.
There is no standard protocol for surgical scrubbing. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of surgical hand scrub duration and method by analyzing their effects on bacterial count.
The study was conducted on 180 surgical nurses and surgeons. While the duration of surgical hand scrub in Groups I and II was one minute, participants in Group I used a nail brush, whereas Group II did not. Similarly, the duration of surgical hand scrub in Groups III and IV was two minutes, but Group III used a nail brush, whereas Group IV did not. Bacterial count on the hands of all participants was measured before and after the surgical hand scrub and after the surgery by using the glove juice method.
Bacterial count on the hands of the participants in Group III after surgical hand scrub was significantly higher than Group IV (P < .001). We did not find any statistically significant difference between Group II and Group IV in terms of bacterial count on the hands immediately after surgical hand scrub and after the surgery (P = .401, P =.658, respectively).
This study found that brushing during surgical hand scrub increased the number of bacteria on the hand. Besides, one-minute surgical hand scrub was equally effective as two-minute scrub to reduce the number of bacteria on the hand.
目前尚无外科洗手的标准方案。本研究旨在通过分析外科洗手持续时间和方法对细菌计数的影响来比较其效果。
本研究纳入了 180 名外科护士和外科医生。第 I 组和第 II 组的外科洗手持续时间为 1 分钟,其中第 I 组使用指甲刷,第 II 组不使用指甲刷;第 III 组和第 IV 组的外科洗手持续时间为 2 分钟,第 III 组使用指甲刷,第 IV 组不使用指甲刷。采用手套汁法分别在外科洗手前、后及手术后测量所有参与者手部的细菌计数。
第 III 组参与者外科洗手后手部的细菌计数明显高于第 IV 组(P<.001)。第 II 组与第 IV 组之间,在外科洗手后即刻和手术后手部的细菌计数方面,差异均无统计学意义(P=0.401,P=0.658)。
本研究发现,外科洗手时刷洗会增加手部的细菌数量。此外,1 分钟的外科洗手与 2 分钟的外科洗手一样有效,可以减少手部的细菌数量。