Suppr超能文献

大型动物外科医生手术刷手法的评估

Evaluation of surgical scrub methods for large animal surgeons.

作者信息

Wan P Y, Blackford J T, Bemis D A, Rohrbach B W, Knoll D E, Provenza M K

机构信息

Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville 37901-1071, USA.

出版信息

Vet Surg. 1997 Sep-Oct;26(5):382-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1997.tb01697.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a 5-minute surgical scrub using either a one-brush or a two-brush technique in clean and dirty surgical procedures, and to compare the efficacy of povidone iodine with chlorhexidine as surgical scrub solutions.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial.

METHODS

Nine veterinarians scrubbed their hands on eight separate occasions using either povidone iodine or chlorhexidine gluconate. A 5-minute scrub and either a one-brush or two-brush technique used in both clean and dirty operations were evaluated by taking glove juice samples before scrubbing, immediately after scrubbing, and 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after scrubbing. Glove juice samples were cultured and the colonies were counted. Percent reductions of bacterial forming units were calculated for all eight scrub procedures.

RESULTS

All scrub procedures provided an adequate percent reduction in colony forming units (CFU) during the 2-hour sampling period. The number of CFU immediately after scrubbing were significantly lower than prescrub. At 120 minutes, there were significantly fewer CFUs than presecrub, but there were more than immediately after scrubbing. No significant difference in reduction in CFUs were detected between one-brush and two-brush techniques. Both chlorhexidine and povidone iodine scrub solutions adequately reduced bacterial colony counts for 120 minutes after scrubbing regardless of the amount of contamination before skin preparation.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacterial counts after a hand scrub procedure using a one-brush technique were not significantly different than after a procedure that used a two-brush technique. Povidone iodine and chlorhexidine are equally effectively in decreasing bacterial numbers on the skin, given a variety of contamination levels present before the scrub procedure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons may use either chlorhexidine or povidone iodine for antiseptic preparation of their hands before surgery. A two-brush technique is not necessary.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定在清洁和污染手术操作中,使用单刷或双刷技术进行5分钟外科洗手的有效性,并比较聚维酮碘与氯己定作为外科洗手溶液的功效。

研究设计

前瞻性临床试验。

方法

九名兽医分别在八个不同场合使用聚维酮碘或葡萄糖酸氯己定洗手。通过在洗手前、洗手后立即以及洗手后30、60、90和120分钟采集手套液样本,评估在清洁和污染手术中使用的5分钟洗手以及单刷或双刷技术。对手套液样本进行培养并计数菌落。计算所有八种洗手程序中细菌形成单位的减少百分比。

结果

在2小时的采样期内,所有洗手程序均使菌落形成单位(CFU)有足够的减少百分比。洗手后立即的CFU数量明显低于洗手前。在120分钟时,CFU数量明显少于洗手前,但比洗手后立即的数量多。单刷和双刷技术在CFU减少方面未检测到显著差异。无论皮肤准备前的污染程度如何,氯己定和聚维酮碘洗手溶液在洗手后120分钟内均能充分减少细菌菌落计数。

结论

使用单刷技术洗手后的细菌计数与使用双刷技术洗手后的细菌计数无显著差异。考虑到洗手程序前存在的各种污染水平,聚维酮碘和氯己定在减少皮肤上的细菌数量方面同样有效。

临床意义

外科医生在手术前可以使用氯己定或聚维酮碘对手进行消毒准备。双刷技术并非必要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验