Global Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia; Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh.
Formerly Department of Microbiology, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapuramu, 515003, India.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Aug 15;292:112786. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112786. Epub 2021 May 23.
This novel study investigated the fate and distribution in soils, and potential exposure risk of glyphosate, an extensively used herbicide in urban landscapes. The rate-determining step of glyphosate sorption in urban soils involved chemisorption processes through exchange or sharing of electrons that followed the pseudo-second-order kinetics model. As evidenced by the Freundlich isotherm model, glyphosate gets partitioned into heterogeneous surfaces of soil organic matter (OM) and clay minerals, and then diffused into soil micropores. The principal component analysis revealed that soil OM (R = 0.873), oxides of Al (R = 0.361) and Fe (R = 0.126), and contents of clay (R = 0.061) and silt (R = 0.432) were positively correlated with the distribution coefficient (K) of glyphosate, while alkaline pH (R = -0.389) and sand content (R = -0.343) negatively correlated with the K values. Well-decomposed soil OM, consisting of C-H and CO functional groups, enhanced glyphosate sorption, whereas partially decomposed/undecomposed OM facilitated desorption process. Desorption of glyphosate was favoured in seven of nine selected soils due to adverse hysteresis effects (HI = 0.74-1.0). The higher values of leachability index (0.31-1.0) and groundwater ubiquity score (1.60-3.44) calculated for the urban soils indicated the great leaching potential of glyphosate from soil surface to waterbodies. Use of glyphosate on impermeable surfaces might directly contaminate water sources and affect potability of water, non-target biota, and food safety. The calculated values of cancer risk (10‒10) and hazard quotient (1.47 × 10‒4.12 × 10) suggested that the human exposure to glyphosate-contaminated soils through dermal, ingestion and inhalation pathways might cause negligible or no carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks to humans. Therefore, glyphosate should be applied judiciously at recommended concentrations in the urban landscapes, mainly on impervious surfaces, to minimize its health impacts in humans and environment.
这项新的研究调查了草甘膦在城市景观中的命运和在土壤中的分布,以及其潜在的暴露风险。草甘膦在城市土壤中的吸附速率决定步骤涉及通过电子交换或共享的化学吸附过程,遵循伪二级动力学模型。正如 Freundlich 等温模型所表明的那样,草甘膦被分配到土壤有机质(OM)和粘土矿物的非均相表面,然后扩散到土壤微孔中。主成分分析表明,土壤有机质(R = 0.873)、Al 氧化物(R = 0.361)和 Fe 氧化物(R = 0.126)、粘土含量(R = 0.061)和粉土含量(R = 0.432)与草甘膦的分配系数(K)呈正相关,而碱性 pH(R = -0.389)和砂含量(R = -0.343)与 K 值呈负相关。由 C-H 和 CO 官能团组成的高度分解的土壤有机质增强了草甘膦的吸附,而部分分解/未分解的有机质促进了解吸过程。由于不利的滞后效应(HI = 0.74-1.0),在所选的九种土壤中的七种土壤中有利于草甘膦的解吸。计算得出的城市土壤的浸出指数(0.31-1.0)和地下水普遍存在得分(1.60-3.44)较高,表明草甘膦从土壤表面到水体的淋滤潜力很大。在不透水表面使用草甘膦可能会直接污染水源,影响水的可饮用性、非目标生物群和食品安全。计算得出的癌症风险(10-10)和危害系数(1.47×10-4.12×10)表明,人类通过皮肤接触、摄入和吸入途径接触受草甘膦污染的土壤,可能会导致对人类产生可忽略不计或无致癌和非致癌风险。因此,在城市景观中,草甘膦应在推荐浓度下谨慎使用,主要是在不透水表面上,以最大程度地减少其对人类和环境的健康影响。