Suppr超能文献

经皮肾镜取石术与开放性结石手术的比较。

Comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and open stone procedures.

作者信息

Netto N R, Lemos G C, De Almeida Claro J F, Palma P C

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of Campinas Medical School Unicamp, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 1988;20(3):225-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02549508.

Abstract

A total of 205 patients have undergone stone extraction surgery. Three groups were studied: in 70 patients the stones were removed by flank incision, in 20 patients by posterior incision and 80 patients were treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Patients submitted to percutaneous nephrolithotomy had a shorter hospitalization, operative time and a significantly reduced period of recuperation, allowing earlier return to work and decreased disability. Narcotic drugs were demanded in a lower amount in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy group.

摘要

共有205例患者接受了取石手术。研究分为三组:70例患者通过侧腹切口取石,20例患者通过后切口取石,80例患者接受经皮肾镜取石术治疗。接受经皮肾镜取石术的患者住院时间、手术时间较短,康复期明显缩短,能够更早重返工作岗位,残疾程度降低。经皮肾镜取石术组对麻醉药物的需求量较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验