• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[两种新型持久性有机污染物对雅鲁藏布江沉积物中硝化作用的影响]

[Effects of Two PPCPs on Nitrification in Sediments in the Yarlung Zangbo River].

作者信息

Ling Xin, Xu Hui-Ping, Lu Guang-Hua

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lakes, Ministry of Education, College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Jun 8;42(6):2868-2874. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202011199.

DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202011199
PMID:34032086
Abstract

To understand the effects of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) on nitrogen transformation in high-altitude rivers, we investigated the influence of the single and combined exposure of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and 2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC) at different concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10, and 100 μg·L) on nitrification in the sediments of the Yarlung Zangbo River in sediment slurry experiments. All treatments significantly reduced nitrification rates, and the maximum inhibition rates induced by SMX and EHMC (alone and in combination) were 47%, 50%, and 66%, respectively. SMX significantly inhibited ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) activity in a concentration-dependent manner, with the inhibition rates ranging from 51% to 78%. The inhibitory effect of SMX combined with EHMC on AMO activity was similar to or stronger than that of SMX alone, and the inhibition rates ranged from 55% to 84%. All EHMC exposures also significantly inhibited AMO activity, but the inhibition rates decreased with an increase in EHMC concentrations. The gene abundance was significantly reduced in all the treatments, and SMX alone and in combination with EHMC induced stronger inhibitory effects than EHMC alone. SMX alone and in combination with EHMC significantly inhibited HAO activity, showing a similar concentration-effect relationship, but their combined exposure produced a stronger effect. SMX alone and in combination with EHMC also significantly decreased gene abundance in the sediments, and the maximum inhibition rates were 76% and 68%, respectively. Although exposure to higher concentrations of EHMC increased gene abundance and HAO activity, the notable decrease in nitrification rates in the sediments suggested that oxidation of ammonia to hydroxylamine catalyzed by AMO was the rate-limiting step in the nitrification process. The results also showed that PPCPs influence the activities of nitrifying communities in the sediments of high-altitude rivers and inhibit nitrification, and their coexistence further increases the pressure of nitrogen loading in aquatic ecosystems.

摘要

为了解药品和个人护理产品(PPCPs)对高海拔河流氮转化的影响,我们在沉积物悬液实验中研究了不同浓度(0.01、0.1、1.0、10和100 μg·L)的磺胺甲恶唑(SMX)和2-乙基己基-4-甲氧基肉桂酸酯(EHMC)单独及联合暴露对雅鲁藏布江沉积物中硝化作用的影响。所有处理均显著降低了硝化速率,SMX和EHMC(单独及联合)诱导的最大抑制率分别为47%、50%和66%。SMX以浓度依赖的方式显著抑制氨单加氧酶(AMO)活性,抑制率在51%至78%之间。SMX与EHMC联合对AMO活性的抑制作用与单独使用SMX相似或更强,抑制率在55%至84%之间。所有EHMC暴露也显著抑制AMO活性,但抑制率随EHMC浓度增加而降低。所有处理中 基因丰度均显著降低,单独的SMX及其与EHMC联合诱导的抑制作用比单独的EHMC更强。单独的SMX及其与EHMC联合显著抑制羟胺氧化酶(HAO)活性,呈现相似的浓度效应关系,但它们的联合暴露产生更强的效应。单独的SMX及其与EHMC联合也显著降低了沉积物中的 基因丰度,最大抑制率分别为76%和68%。尽管暴露于较高浓度的EHMC会增加 基因丰度和HAO活性,但沉积物中硝化速率的显著降低表明,AMO催化氨氧化为羟胺是硝化过程中的限速步骤。结果还表明,PPCPs影响高海拔河流沉积物中硝化群落的活性并抑制硝化作用,它们的共存进一步增加了水生生态系统中氮负荷的压力。

相似文献

1
[Effects of Two PPCPs on Nitrification in Sediments in the Yarlung Zangbo River].[两种新型持久性有机污染物对雅鲁藏布江沉积物中硝化作用的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Jun 8;42(6):2868-2874. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202011199.
2
Effects of Sulfamethoxazole and 2-Ethylhexyl-4-Methoxycinnamate on the Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction Processes and NO Release in Sediments in the Yarlung Zangbo River.磺胺甲噁唑和 2-乙基己基-4-甲氧基肉桂酸对雅鲁藏布江沉积物异化硝酸盐还原过程及 NO 释放的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 11;17(6):1822. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061822.
3
Effects of sulfamethoxazole on coupling of nitrogen removal with nitrification in Yangtze Estuary sediments.磺胺甲恶唑对长江口沉积物中氮去除与硝化耦联的影响。
Environ Pollut. 2021 Feb 15;271:116382. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116382. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
4
Biodegradation of 2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate in river sediments and its impact on microbial communities.2-乙基己基-4-甲氧基肉桂酸酯在河底沉积物中的生物降解及其对微生物群落的影响。
J Environ Sci (China). 2021 Jun;104:307-316. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.12.013. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
5
Effects of Freeze-Thaw Cycles on Phosphorus from Sediments in the Middle Reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River.冻融循环对雅鲁藏布江中游沉积物中磷的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 8;16(19):3783. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193783.
6
Response of partial nitrification sludge to the single and combined stress of CuO nanoparticles and sulfamethoxazole antibiotic on microbial activity, community and resistance genes.部分硝化污泥对 CuO 纳米颗粒和磺胺甲恶唑抗生素单一及复合胁迫下微生物活性、群落及抗性基因的响应。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 10;712:135759. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135759. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
7
Quantification of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and factors controlling nitrification in salt marsh sediments.盐沼沉积物中氨氧化细菌的定量分析及控制硝化作用的因素
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jan;71(1):240-6. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.240-246.2005.
8
[Distribution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of PPCPs in Surface Water and Aquatic Organisms in Chaoshan Coastal Area along the South China Sea].[南海潮汕沿海地区地表水体及水生生物中新型持久性有机污染物的分布特征及风险评估]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Oct 8;41(10):4514-4524. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202001203.
9
Response of ammonia oxidizing archaea and bacteria to decabromodiphenyl ether and copper contamination in river sediments.河流沉积物中氨氧化古菌和细菌对十溴二苯醚及铜污染的响应
Chemosphere. 2018 Jan;191:858-867. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.067. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
[Distribution and Potential Nitrification Rates of Aerobic Ammonia-Oxidizing Microorganisms in Surface Sediments of Mangrove in Sanya River].三亚河红树林表层沉积物中好氧氨氧化微生物的分布及潜在硝化速率
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Aug 8;41(8):3787-3796. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201912116.