• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助化疗后病理缓解对胃肠道癌辅助治疗决策和患者结局的影响。

Impact of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on adjuvant therapy decisions and patient outcomes in gastrointestinal cancers.

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Dec;4(6):e1412. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1412. Epub 2021 May 25.

DOI:10.1002/cnr2.1412
PMID:34032391
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8714550/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is frequently used in gastrointestinal cancers (GIC), and pathological, radiological, and tumor marker responses are assessed during and after NAC.

AIM

To evaluate the relationship between pathologic, radiologic, tumor marker responses and recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) decisions, and the impact of changing to a different AC regimen after poor response to NAC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Medical records of GIC patients treated with NAC at Mount Sinai between 1/2012 and 12/2018 were reviewed. One hundred fifty-six patients (58.3% male, mean age 63 years) were identified. Primary tumor sites were: 43 (27.7%) pancreas, 62 (39.7%) gastroesophageal, and 51 (32.7%) colorectal. After NAC, 31 (19.9%) patients had favorable pathologic response (FPR; defined as College of American Pathologists [CAP] score 0-1). Of 107 patients with radiological data, 59 (55.1%) had an objective response, and of 113 patients with tumor marker data, 61 (54.0%) had a ≥50% reduction post NAC. FPR, but not radiographic or serological responses, was associated with improved RFS (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.11-0.72) and OS (HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.2-0.94). Changing to a different AC regimen from initial NAC, among all patients and specifically among those with unfavorable pathological response (UPR; defined as CAP score 2-3) after NAC, was not associated with improved RFS or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

GIC patients with FPR after NAC experienced significant improvements in RFS and OS. Patients with UPR did not benefit from changing AC. Prospective studies to better understand the role of pathological response in AC decisions and outcomes in GIC patients are needed.

摘要

背景

新辅助化疗(NAC)常用于胃肠道癌症(GIC),并在 NAC 期间和之后评估病理、影像学和肿瘤标志物的反应。

目的

评估病理、影像学、肿瘤标志物反应与无复发生存(RFS)、总生存(OS)、辅助化疗(AC)决策的关系,以及在 NAC 反应不佳后改变为不同 AC 方案的影响。

方法和结果

回顾了 2012 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月在西奈山医院接受 NAC 治疗的 GIC 患者的病历。确定了 156 名患者(58.3%为男性,平均年龄 63 岁)。原发肿瘤部位为:胰腺 43 例(27.7%),胃食管 62 例(39.7%),结直肠 51 例(32.7%)。NAC 后,31 名患者(19.9%)有良好的病理反应(FPR;定义为美国病理学家学院[CAP]评分 0-1)。107 名有影像学资料的患者中,59 名(55.1%)有客观反应,113 名有肿瘤标志物资料的患者中,61 名(54.0%)NAC 后有≥50%的降低。FPR 与改善 RFS(HR 0.28;95%CI 0.11-0.72)和 OS(HR 0.13;95%CI 0.2-0.94)相关,但影像学或血清学反应则没有。在所有患者中,尤其是在 NAC 后病理反应不佳(UPR;定义为 CAP 评分 2-3)的患者中,从初始 NAC 改为不同的 AC 方案,与 RFS 或 OS 的改善无关。

结论

NAC 后 FPR 的 GIC 患者的 RFS 和 OS 显著改善。UPR 患者从改变 AC 中没有获益。需要前瞻性研究以更好地了解病理反应在 GIC 患者的 AC 决策和结果中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f58/8714550/f5a24c7e2dd3/CNR2-4-e1412-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f58/8714550/4c0cb457a046/CNR2-4-e1412-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f58/8714550/f5a24c7e2dd3/CNR2-4-e1412-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f58/8714550/4c0cb457a046/CNR2-4-e1412-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f58/8714550/f5a24c7e2dd3/CNR2-4-e1412-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on adjuvant therapy decisions and patient outcomes in gastrointestinal cancers.新辅助化疗后病理缓解对胃肠道癌辅助治疗决策和患者结局的影响。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Dec;4(6):e1412. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1412. Epub 2021 May 25.
2
Refining the indications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with HER2+ breast cancer: A single institution experience.优化曲妥珠单抗为基础的新辅助化疗用于人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性乳腺癌患者的适应证:单中心经验。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;121(3):447-455. doi: 10.1002/jso.25814. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
3
Time to surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer impacts residual cancer burden, recurrence, and survival.新辅助化疗后行乳腺癌手术的时间影响残余肿瘤负担、复发和生存。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;122(8):1761-1769. doi: 10.1002/jso.26216. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
4
[Prognostic analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer with propensity score matching method].[应用倾向评分匹配法对局部进展期胃癌新辅助化疗的预后分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 25;21(10):1148-1153.
5
Obesity is an independent prognostic factor of decreased pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.肥胖是乳腺癌患者对新辅助化疗的病理完全缓解率降低的独立预后因素。
Breast. 2017 Apr;32:237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
Is adjuvant chemotherapy beneficial for stage II-III goblet cell carcinoid/goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix?辅助化疗对 II-III 期阑尾杯状细胞类癌/杯状细胞腺癌是否有益?
Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;36:120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
7
Long-term Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Cisplatin and S-1 for Stage III Gastric Cancer.新辅助化疗联合多西他赛、顺铂和替吉奥治疗 III 期胃癌的长期疗效。
Anticancer Res. 2023 Jun;43(6):2841-2850. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16453.
8
Assessing the Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary High-Risk Truncal/Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas: An Analysis of the Multi-institutional U.S. Sarcoma Collaborative.评估新辅助化疗在原发性高风险躯干/肢体软组织肉瘤中的作用:美国肉瘤协作多机构分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(11):3542-3549. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07639-7. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
9
Incidence, Patterns, and Outcomes with Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Urinary Tract Cancers.新辅助化疗后残余疾病辅助化疗的发生率、模式和结果在肌层浸润性尿路肿瘤中的应用。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;3(5):671-679. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.013. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
10
Clinical Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Analysis of 884 Patients at Facilities Specializing in Pancreatic Surgery.新辅助化疗和放化疗对边界可切除胰腺癌的临床影响:884 例胰腺外科专科医院患者的分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1629-1636. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-07131-8. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic Impact of HOTAIR, LINC00951, POLR2E and HULC Polymorphisms in Histopathological and Laboratory Prognostic Factors in Esophageal Cancer in the West: A Case-Control Study.HOTAIR、LINC00951、POLR2E和HULC基因多态性对西方食管癌组织病理学和实验室预后因素的遗传影响:一项病例对照研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 26;16(3):537. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030537.
2
Associations of long non-coding RNAs HOTAIR, LINC00951, POLR2E and HULC polymorphisms with the risk of esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer in a western population: a case-control study.长链非编码 RNA HOTAIR、LINC00951、POLR2E 和 HULC 多态性与西方人群食管和食管胃交界部癌风险的关联:一项病例对照研究。
Mol Biol Rep. 2024 Feb 1;51(1):249. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09206-0.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response-Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial.随机 II 期研究:基于 PET 反应的食管癌放化疗综合治疗:CALGB 80803(Alliance)试验的成熟结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;39(25):2803-2815. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03611. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
2
Is Complete Pathologic Response in Pancreatic Cancer Overestimated? A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies.胰腺癌的完全病理缓解是否被高估了?一项前瞻性研究的系统评价。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Oct;24(10):2336-2348. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04697-1. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: defining the incidence, predictors, and outcomes.
Choosing Wisely Philippines: ten low-value or harmful practices that should be avoided in cancer care.明智选择菲律宾:癌症护理中应避免的十种低价值或有害做法。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Jul 7;16:1424. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1424. eCollection 2022.
胰腺导管腺癌新辅助治疗后的病理完全缓解:确定发生率、预测因素及预后。
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Nov;22(11):1569-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
Long-term outcomes by response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.接受手术切除的胰腺腺癌患者新辅助化疗或放化疗疗效的长期预后
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Oct;10(5):918-927. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2019.07.02.
5
Survival benefit of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A propensity matching and intention-to-treat analysis.新辅助治疗对非转移性胰腺导管腺癌患者生存获益的影响:倾向评分匹配和意向治疗分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;120(6):976-984. doi: 10.1002/jso.25681. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
6
Factors Predicting Response, Perioperative Outcomes, and Survival Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Borderline/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.影响边界性/局部进展期胰腺癌新辅助放化疗后疗效、围手术期结局及生存的因素。
Ann Surg. 2021 Feb 1;273(2):341-349. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003284.
7
The Prognostic Value of a Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Digestive Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 21 Studies.新辅助治疗后消化道癌病理完全缓解的预后价值:21 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 May;26(5):1412-1420. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-07147-0. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
8
CEA clearance pattern as a predictor of tumor response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: a post-hoc analysis of FOWARC trial.CEA 清除模式预测直肠癌新辅助治疗的肿瘤反应:FOWARC 试验的事后分析。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):1145. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4997-y.
9
Association Between Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Overall Survival in Patients With Rectal Cancer and Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Resection.新辅助化疗和切除术后病理完全缓解的直肠癌患者辅助化疗与总生存的关系。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;4(7):930-937. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5597.
10
Meta-analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.比较可切除或交界可切除胰腺癌患者术前手术与新辅助治疗的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jul;105(8):946-958. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10870. Epub 2018 Apr 30.