• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定中国西北地区孕妇的最佳体重增长:CONSORT 研究。

Determining optimal gestational weight gain (GWG) in a northwest Chinese population: A CONSORT.

机构信息

Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child Care Hospital, Qilihe District, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 28;100(21):e26080. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026080.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000026080
PMID:34032741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8154430/
Abstract

To determine optimal gestational weight gain (GWG) for the Chinese population.Live singleton deliveries at the largest maternal & childcare hospital in northwest China from 2010 to 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the lowest aggregated risk of interested perinatal outcomes based on Chinese adult body mass index (BMI) categories.Eight thousand eight hundred seventy enrolled parturients were divided into 4 groups according to their prepregnancy BMI: underweight (21.31%, BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (67.81%, 18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 24 kg/m2), overweight (8.99%, 24 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m2 and obese (1.89%, BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2). The optimal GWG values for the above 4 groups were 16.7 kg (GWG range, 12.0-21.5), 14.5 kg (9.5-19.5), 11.5 kg (7.0-16.5), and 8.0 kg (5.0-13.0). The rates of inadequate, optimal and excessive GWG in present study were 6.14% (545), 62.34% (5529), and 31.52% (2796) respectively, which were significantly different from those of the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendation (χ2 = 1416.05, Pinteraction < 0.0001).Wider optimal GWG ranges than those recommended by Institute of Medicine were found in our study, and our proposed criteria seems to be practical to the Chinese population.

摘要

为了确定中国人的最佳妊娠体重增加(GWG)。回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2012 年中国西北地区最大的母婴保健医院的单胎分娩。基于中国成人 BMI 类别,采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定感兴趣的围产期结局的最低综合风险。根据孕前 BMI 将 8870 名产妇分为 4 组:低体重组(21.31%,BMI<18.5kg/m2)、正常体重组(67.81%,18.5kg/m2≤BMI<24kg/m2)、超重组(8.99%,24kg/m2≤BMI<28kg/m2)和肥胖组(1.89%,BMI≥28kg/m2)。上述 4 组的最佳 GWG 值分别为 16.7kg(GWG 范围 12.0-21.5)、14.5kg(9.5-19.5)、11.5kg(7.0-16.5)和 8.0kg(5.0-13.0)。本研究中,GWG 不足、合适和过多的发生率分别为 6.14%(545 例)、62.34%(5529 例)和 31.52%(2796 例),与 2009 年美国医学研究所的建议明显不同(χ2=1416.05,Pinteration<0.0001)。与美国医学研究所的建议相比,本研究发现更宽的 GWG 范围,并且我们提出的标准似乎对中国人群实用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/863d/8154430/c2378c4d2f14/medi-100-e26080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/863d/8154430/c2378c4d2f14/medi-100-e26080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/863d/8154430/c2378c4d2f14/medi-100-e26080-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Determining optimal gestational weight gain (GWG) in a northwest Chinese population: A CONSORT.确定中国西北地区孕妇的最佳体重增长:CONSORT 研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 28;100(21):e26080. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026080.
2
Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies.最佳妊娠体重增加范围与双胎妊娠不同 BMI 类别围生期结局的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222537. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22537.
3
Optimal gestational weight gain in Taiwan: A retrospective cohort study.台湾地区的最佳孕期体重增加:一项回顾性队列研究。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;63(2):220-224. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2024.01.034.
4
Investigation of optimal gestational weight gain for twin pregnancy in Southwest China: a retrospective study.中国西南地区双胎妊娠最佳孕期体重增长的调查:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 28;13(1):5059. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31766-7.
5
[Relationship between the risk of emergency cesarean section for nullipara with the prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain].初产妇急诊剖宫产风险与孕前体重指数或孕期体重增加的关系
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 25;52(11):757-764. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.11.008.
6
Total gestational weight gain and the risk of preeclampsia by pre-pregnancy body mass index categories: a population-based cohort study from 2013 to 2017.总孕期体重增加与孕前体重指数类别与子痫前期风险的关系:2013 年至 2017 年的一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Perinat Med. 2019 Aug 27;47(6):585-591. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0008.
7
Optimal range of gestational weight gain for singleton pregnant women: a cohort study based on Chinese specific body mass index categories.单胎妊娠孕妇最佳孕期体重增长范围:基于中国特有体质指数分类的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 31;24(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06592-y.
8
Gestational weight gain in Chinese women -- results from a retrospective cohort in Changsha, China.中国女性的妊娠期体重增加——来自中国长沙的回顾性队列研究结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 29;18(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1833-y.
9
Pregestational body mass index, gestational weight gain, and risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes among Taiwanese women: A retrospective cohort study.台湾女性孕前体重指数、孕期体重增加与不良妊娠结局风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;55(4):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.016.
10
Associations of body mass index and gestational weight gain with term pregnancy outcomes in urban Cameroon: a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital.喀麦隆城市地区体重指数和孕期体重增加与足月妊娠结局的关联:一项在三级医院开展的回顾性队列研究
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Dec 19;8:806. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1765-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal range of gestational weight gain for singleton pregnant women: a cohort study based on Chinese specific body mass index categories.单胎妊娠孕妇最佳孕期体重增长范围:基于中国特有体质指数分类的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 31;24(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06592-y.
2
Effect of gestational weight gain on postpartum pelvic floor function in twin primiparas: a single-center retrospective study in China.中国单中心回顾性研究:双胎初产妇孕期体重增加对产后盆底功能的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05602-9.
3
A prospective analysis of optimal total weight gain ranges and trimester-specific weight gain rates for Chinese pregnant women.
对中国孕妇最佳总增重范围和特定孕期体重增加率的前瞻性分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05398-8.