Foshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Department of Obstetrics, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222537. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22537.
The existing gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations for twin pregnancies are lacking for underweight individuals and are not stratified by obesity class.
To identify optimal GWG ranges associated with reduced adverse perinatal outcomes stratified by prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) categories in twin pregnancies.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study of twin pregnancies using data from the National Center for Health Statistics was conducted between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed from October 24, 2021, to May 7, 2022. The study population comprised 262 604 individuals between 18 and 45 years of age with live-born twins without congenital malformation between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation. Two approaches were used to determine the optimal GWG ranges: a statistics-based approach calculating IQRs of GWG in a low-risk population, and an outcome-based approach identifying GWG thresholds below or above which an adverse perinatal outcome increased.
Gestational weight gain.
Preterm birth less than 36 weeks, gestational hypertensive disorders, small for gestational age status, large for gestational age status, and a composite outcome defined as any occurrence of the individual outcomes.
The main sample comprised 200 810 individuals with twin pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 30.4 [5.5] years; 1624 [0.8%] American Indian or Alaska Native, 13 031 [6.5%] Asian or Pacific Islander, 36 423 [18.1%] Black, and 149 732 [74.6%] White; and 137 409 [68.4%] multiparous). In the low-risk subgroup (n = 61 794), the IQRs of the total GWG after 36 weeks of gestation as assessed using a statistics-based approach and based on BMI group were 15.9 to 22.7 kg for underweight, 15.4 to 22.7 kg for normal weight, 12.7 to 22.2 kg for overweight, 10.0 to 20.0 kg for class 1 obesity, 7.7 to 18.1 kg for class 2 obesity, and 5.9 to 16.3 kg for class 3 obesity. The absolute risk of the composite outcome showed U-shaped associations with GWG across BMI categories. The optimal GWG ranges by 36 weeks identified using an outcome-based approach and BMI group were 17.5 to 24.9 kg for underweight, 15.0 to 24.9 kg for normal weight, 15.0 to 24.9 kg for overweight, 10.0 to 19.9 kg for class 1 obesity, 7.5 to 17.4 kg for class 2 obesity, and 5.0 to 9.9 kg for class 3 obesity. The multivariable logistic models assessed using the validation sample (n = 49 275) showed that GWG defined outside those optimal ranges was associated with preterm birth at less than 36 weeks, gestational hypertensive disorders, and small or large for gestational age.
This population-based cohort study found that optimal GWG ranges were similar for individuals with underweight and normal weight but decreased with increasing severity of obesity. The current US Institute of Medicine GWG recommendations may be too high for individuals with moderate or severe obesity.
现有的双胞胎妊娠增重(GWG)建议对于体重不足的个体是不足的,并且没有按肥胖类别进行分层。
确定与孕前体重指数(BMI)类别相关的最佳 GWG 范围,以降低双胞胎妊娠的不良围产期结局。
设计、地点和参与者:这项基于人群的双胞胎妊娠队列研究使用了国家卫生统计中心的数据,研究时间为 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日。统计分析于 2021 年 10 月 24 日至 2022 年 5 月 7 日进行。研究人群包括年龄在 18 至 45 岁之间、妊娠 24 至 42 周且无先天性畸形的活产双胞胎。采用两种方法确定最佳 GWG 范围:一种是基于统计的方法,计算低危人群 GWG 的 IQR;另一种是基于结果的方法,确定 GWG 阈值低于或高于该阈值时不良围产结局增加。
GWG。
早产小于 36 周、妊娠高血压疾病、小于胎龄儿状态、大于胎龄儿状态以及任何个体结局发生的复合结局。
主要样本包括 200810 名双胞胎妊娠患者(平均[标准差]母亲年龄为 30.4[5.5]岁;1624[0.8%]美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民,13031[6.5%]亚洲或太平洋岛民,36423[18.1%]黑人,149732[74.6%]白人;137409[68.4%]多产妇)。在低危亚组(n=61794)中,基于 BMI 组,使用基于统计的方法评估的 36 周后总 GWG 的 IQR 为体重不足 15.9 至 22.7kg,正常体重 15.4 至 22.7kg,超重 12.7 至 22.2kg,1 类肥胖 10.0 至 20.0kg,2 类肥胖 7.7 至 18.1kg,3 类肥胖 5.9 至 16.3kg。按 BMI 类别,复合结局的绝对风险与 GWG 呈 U 形关联。使用基于结果的方法和 BMI 组确定的 36 周最佳 GWG 范围为体重不足 17.5 至 24.9kg,正常体重 15.0 至 24.9kg,超重 15.0 至 24.9kg,1 类肥胖 10.0 至 19.9kg,2 类肥胖 7.5 至 17.4kg,3 类肥胖 5.0 至 9.9kg。使用验证样本(n=49275)评估的多变量逻辑模型表明,GWG 定义在这些最佳范围之外与早产小于 36 周、妊娠高血压疾病和小于胎龄或大于胎龄有关。
这项基于人群的队列研究发现,体重不足和正常体重的个体最佳 GWG 范围相似,但随着肥胖程度的增加而降低。目前美国医学研究所的 GWG 建议对于中度或重度肥胖的个体可能过高。