Université de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Pôle anesthésie réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP Nord, Paris, France.
JAMA. 2021 May 25;325(20):2056-2066. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.5561.
Fluid therapy is an important component of care for patients with traumatic brain injury, but whether it modulates clinical outcomes remains unclear.
To determine whether continuous infusion of hypertonic saline solution improves neurological outcome at 6 months in patients with traumatic brain injury.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted in 9 intensive care units in France, including 370 patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury who were recruited from October 2017 to August 2019. Follow-up was completed in February 2020.
Adult patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury were randomly assigned to receive continuous infusion of 20% hypertonic saline solution plus standard care (n = 185) or standard care alone (controls; n = 185). The 20% hypertonic saline solution was administered for 48 hours or longer if patients remained at risk of intracranial hypertension.
The primary outcome was Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) score (range, 1-8, with lower scores indicating worse functional outcome) at 6 months, obtained centrally by blinded assessors and analyzed with ordinal logistic regression adjusted for prespecified prognostic factors (with a common odds ratio [OR] >1.0 favoring intervention). There were 12 secondary outcomes measured at multiple time points, including development of intracranial hypertension and 6-month mortality.
Among 370 patients who were randomized (median age, 44 [interquartile range, 27-59] years; 77 [20.2%] women), 359 (97%) completed the trial. The adjusted common OR for the GOS-E score at 6 months was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.71-1.47; P = .92). Of the 12 secondary outcomes, 10 were not significantly different. Intracranial hypertension developed in 62 (33.7%) patients in the intervention group and 66 (36.3%) patients in the control group (absolute difference, -2.6% [95% CI, -12.3% to 7.2%]; OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.51-1.26]). There was no significant difference in 6-month mortality (29 [15.9%] in the intervention group vs 37 [20.8%] in the control group; absolute difference, -4.9% [95% CI, -12.8% to 3.1%]; hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.48-1.28]).
Among patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, treatment with continuous infusion of 20% hypertonic saline compared with standard care did not result in a significantly better neurological status at 6 months. However, confidence intervals for the findings were wide, and the study may have had limited power to detect a clinically important difference.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03143751.
液体疗法是颅脑创伤患者治疗的重要组成部分,但它是否能调节临床结果仍不清楚。
确定连续输注高渗盐水溶液是否能改善颅脑创伤患者 6 个月时的神经功能预后。
设计、地点和参与者:这项多中心随机临床试验在法国 9 个重症监护病房进行,纳入了 2017 年 10 月至 2019 年 8 月期间招募的 370 名中度至重度颅脑创伤患者,随访于 2020 年 2 月完成。
中度至重度颅脑创伤的成年患者被随机分配接受 20%高渗盐水溶液持续输注加标准治疗(n = 185)或单独标准治疗(对照组;n = 185)。如果患者仍有颅内压升高的风险,20%高渗盐水溶液的输注时间将持续 48 小时或更长时间。
主要结局是由盲法评估者在中心获得的扩展格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS-E)评分(范围为 1-8,评分越低表示功能预后越差),并通过预先指定的预后因素进行有序逻辑回归分析调整(优势比[OR]大于 1.0 表示干预有利)。在多个时间点测量了 12 个次要结局,包括颅内压升高和 6 个月死亡率。
在 370 名随机患者中(中位年龄为 44 [四分位间距,27-59]岁;77 [20.2%]为女性),359 名(97%)完成了试验。6 个月时 GOS-E 评分的调整后的常见 OR 为 1.02(95%CI,0.71-1.47;P = .92)。在 12 个次要结局中,有 10 个没有显著差异。干预组 62 名(33.7%)患者和对照组 66 名(36.3%)患者发生颅内压升高(绝对差异,-2.6% [95%CI,-12.3%至 7.2%];OR,0.80 [95%CI,0.51-1.26])。6 个月死亡率无显著差异(干预组 29 名 [15.9%] vs 对照组 37 名 [20.8%];绝对差异,-4.9% [95%CI,-12.8%至 3.1%];风险比,0.79 [95%CI,0.48-1.28])。
在中度至重度颅脑创伤患者中,与标准治疗相比,连续输注 20%高渗盐水溶液治疗并未导致 6 个月时神经功能状态明显改善。然而,研究结果的置信区间较宽,且该研究可能检测到临床重要差异的能力有限。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03143751。