Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States.
Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Resuscitation. 2021 Jul;164:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 24.
Guideline deviations with impact on patient outcomes frequently occur during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, barriers and facilitators for preventing these guideline deviations are understudied. We aimed to characterize challenges occurring during IHCA and identify barriers and facilitators perceived by actual team members immediately following IHCA events.
This was a prospective multicenter clinical study. Following each resuscitation attempt in 6 hospitals over a 4-year period, we immediately sent web-based structured questionnaires to all responding team members, reporting their perceived resuscitation quality, teamwork, and communication and what they perceived as barriers or facilitators. Comments were analyzed using qualitative inductive thematic analysis methodology.
We identified 924 resuscitation attempts and 3,698 survey responses were collected including 2,095 qualitative comments (response rate: 65%). Most frequent challenges were overcrowding (27%) and poor ergonomics/choreography of people in the room (17%). Narrative comments aligned into 24 unique barrier and facilitator themes in 4 domains: 6 related to treatment (most prevalent: CPR, rhythm check, equipment), 7 for teamwork (most prevalent: role allocation, crowd control, collaboration with ward staff), 6 for leadership (most prevalent: visible and distinct leader, multiple leaders, leader experience), and 5 for communication (most prevalent: closed loops, atmosphere in room, speaking loud/clear).
Using novel, immediate after-event survey methodology of individual cardiac arrest team members, we characterized challenges and identified 24 themes within 4 domains that were barriers and facilitators for in-hospital resuscitation teams. We believe this level of detail is necessary to contextualize guidelines and training to facilitate high-quality resuscitation.
在院内心肺复苏(CPR)过程中,经常会出现影响患者结局的指南偏差。然而,预防这些指南偏差的障碍和促进因素研究不足。我们旨在描述 IHCA 期间出现的挑战,并确定 IHCA 事件后实际团队成员感知到的障碍和促进因素。
这是一项前瞻性多中心临床研究。在 6 家医院进行了 4 年的复苏尝试后,我们立即向所有反应的团队成员发送了基于网络的结构化问卷,报告他们感知的复苏质量、团队合作以及沟通情况,以及他们认为的障碍或促进因素。使用定性归纳主题分析方法对评论进行分析。
我们确定了 924 次复苏尝试,共收集了 3698 份调查回复,包括 2095 份定性评论(回复率:65%)。最常见的挑战是过度拥挤(27%)和房间内人员的人体工程学/编排不佳(17%)。叙事评论分为 4 个领域的 24 个独特的障碍和促进因素主题:与治疗相关的 6 个(最常见的是 CPR、节律检查、设备)、与团队合作相关的 7 个(最常见的是角色分配、人群控制、与病房工作人员的合作)、与领导力相关的 6 个(最常见的是有明显而独特的领导者、多个领导者、领导者经验)和与沟通相关的 5 个(最常见的是闭环、房间氛围、大声清晰地说话)。
使用新颖的、事件后立即对单个心脏骤停团队成员进行调查的方法,我们描述了挑战,并确定了 4 个领域内的 24 个主题,这些主题是院内复苏团队的障碍和促进因素。我们认为,这种详细程度对于使指南和培训适应高质量复苏是必要的。