Suppr超能文献

抗抑郁药与安慰剂、“活性安慰剂”或不干预对成人重度抑郁症的有益和有害影响:对已发表和未发表数据进行系统评价的方案,包括荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。

Beneficial and harmful effects of antidepressants versus placebo, 'active placebo', or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a protocol for a systematic review of published and unpublished data with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.

机构信息

Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Stolpegaardsvej 28, 2820, Gentofte, Denmark.

Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Østre Farimagsgade 2A, København K, 1353, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 May 25;10(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01705-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder is one of the most common, burdensome, and costly psychiatric disorders worldwide. Antidepressants are frequently used to treat major depressive disorder. It has been shown repeatedly that antidepressants seem to reduce depressive symptoms with a statistically significant effect, but the clinical importance of the effect sizes seems questionable. Both beneficial and harmful effects of antidepressants have not previously been sufficiently assessed. The main objective of this review will be to evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of antidepressants versus placebo, 'active placebo', or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder.

METHODS/DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analysis will be reported as recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool-version 2 (ROB2), our eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed, Trial Sequential Analysis will be conducted to control for random errors, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. To identify relevant trials, we will search both for published and unpublished trials in major medical databases from their inception to the present. Clinical study reports will be obtained from regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies. Two review authors will independently screen the results of the literature searches, extract data, and perform risk of bias assessment. We will include any published or unpublished randomised clinical trial comparing one or more antidepressants with placebo, 'active placebo', or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder. The following active agents will be included: agomelatine, amineptine, amitriptyline, bupropion, butriptyline, cianopramine, citalopram, clomipramine, dapoxetine, demexiptiline, desipramine, desvenlafaxine, dibenzepin, dosulepin, dothiepin, doxepin, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, imipramine, iprindole, levomilnacipran, lofepramine, maprotiline, melitracen, metapramine, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, nortriptyline, noxiptiline, opipramol, paroxetine, protriptyline, quinupramine, reboxetine, sertraline, trazodone, tianeptine, trimipramine, venlafaxine, vilazodone, and vortioxetine. Primary outcomes will be depressive symptoms, serious adverse events, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes will be suicide or suicide attempt, suicidal ideation, and non-serious adverse events.

DISCUSSION

As antidepressants are commonly used to treat major depressive disorder in adults, a systematic review evaluating their beneficial and harmful effects is urgently needed. This review will inform best practice in treatment and clinical research of this highly prevalent and burdensome disorder.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020220279.

摘要

背景

重度抑郁症是全球最常见、负担最重且代价最高的精神疾病之一。抗抑郁药常用于治疗重度抑郁症。已有研究反复表明,抗抑郁药似乎可以降低抑郁症状,且具有统计学意义上的显著效果,但效果大小的临床重要性似乎值得怀疑。抗抑郁药的有益和有害影响以前都没有得到充分评估。本综述的主要目的是评估抗抑郁药与安慰剂、“活性安慰剂”或无干预对成年重度抑郁症患者的有益和有害影响。

方法/设计:我们将按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)的建议进行系统评价和荟萃分析,使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具版本 2(ROB2)评估偏倚,我们将使用八步程序来评估是否达到临床意义的阈值,采用试验序贯分析(TSA)来控制随机误差,并使用 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation(GRADE)方法评估证据的确定性。为了确定相关试验,我们将从各大医学数据库的成立之初开始搜索已发表和未发表的试验。临床研究报告将从监管机构和制药公司获得。两名综述作者将独立筛选文献搜索结果、提取数据并进行偏倚风险评估。我们将纳入任何已发表或未发表的比较一种或多种抗抑郁药与安慰剂、“活性安慰剂”或无干预对成年重度抑郁症患者的随机临床试验。以下活性药物将包括:阿戈美拉汀、阿米奈丁、阿米替林、安非他酮、布普品、曲唑酮、西酞普兰、氯米帕明、达泊西汀、地昔帕明、去甲文拉法辛、地昔布汀、度洛西汀、二甲噻嗪、多塞平、去甲替林、度硫平、丙咪嗪、依普拉酮、依匹哌唑、氟西汀、氟伏沙明、丙咪嗪、异丙嗪、左米那普仑、洛非帕明、马普替林、美拉西酮、美普罗嗪、帕罗西汀、普罗替林、曲唑酮、舍曲林、曲马多、噻奈普汀、三甲丙咪嗪、文拉法辛、维拉佐酮和 vortioxetine。主要结局将是抑郁症状、严重不良事件和生活质量。次要结局将是自杀或自杀企图、自杀意念和非严重不良事件。

讨论

由于抗抑郁药常用于治疗成年重度抑郁症,因此迫切需要进行系统评价评估其有益和有害影响。该综述将为这一高度流行且负担沉重的疾病的最佳治疗和临床研究提供信息。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42020220279。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验