• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The American Rescue Plan Act Is a Great Start but More Increases in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefits Are Likely Needed Due to Implicit Hidden Reductions.《美国救援计划法案》是一个良好的开端,但由于隐性的削减,补充营养援助计划(SNAP)福利可能需要进一步增加。
J Nutr. 2021 Aug 7;151(8):2099-2104. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab125.
2
Association of Grocery Expenditure Relative to Thrifty Food Plan Cost with Diet Quality of Women Participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.相对节俭食物计划成本的杂货支出与参加补充营养援助计划的妇女饮食质量的关联。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Dec;118(12):2315-2323. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
3
Improving Nutrition by Increasing Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefits.通过增加补充营养援助计划福利来改善营养状况。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Feb;52(2S2):S179-S185. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.032.
4
Association of Funding and Meal Preparation Time With Nutritional Quality of Meals of Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program Recipients.资金来源和备餐时间与补充营养援助计划受助人膳食营养质量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2114701. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14701.
5
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation is associated with an increase in household food security in a national evaluation.在一项全国性评估中,补充营养援助计划的参与与家庭粮食安全状况的改善相关。
J Nutr. 2015 Feb;145(2):344-51. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.198697. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
6
Delivering Summer Electronic Benefit Transfers for Children through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children: Benefit Use and Impacts on Food Security and Foods Consumed.通过补充营养援助计划或妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划为儿童提供夏季电子福利转账:福利使用情况及其对粮食安全和所消费食品的影响。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Mar;117(3):367-375.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
7
SNAP-Ed (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education) Increases Long-Term Food Security among Indiana Households with Children in a Randomized Controlled Study.在一项随机对照研究中,SNAP-Ed(补充营养援助计划-教育)提高了印第安纳州有孩子家庭的长期粮食安全。
J Nutr. 2016 Nov;146(11):2375-2382. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.231373. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Affordability on the Thrifty Food Plan Depends on Purchasing Power and Safety Net Supports.美国在节俭食品计划下水果和蔬菜的可负担性取决于购买力和安全网支持。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 27;19(5):2772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052772.
9
An Increase in SNAP Benefits Did Not Impact Food Security or Diet Quality in Youth.食品券福利增加并未影响青少年的食品安全或饮食质量。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Mar;121(3):507-519.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.09.030. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
Links of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program With Food Insecurity, Poverty, and Health: Evidence and Potential.补充营养援助计划与食物不安全、贫困和健康之间的联系:证据和潜力。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Dec;109(12):1636-1640. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305325.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in Food-at-Home Spending for SNAP and Non-SNAP Households Given Geographic Price Variation.考虑到地理位置价格差异,SNAP 和非 SNAP 家庭在家庭食品支出上的差异。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Jul;120(7):1142-1150.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
2
Health and social determinants and outcomes of home cooking: A systematic review of observational studies.家庭烹饪的健康与社会决定因素及结果:观察性研究的系统评价
Appetite. 2017 Apr 1;111:116-134. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.022. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Family chaos and lack of mealtime planning is associated with food insecurity in low income households.家庭混乱和缺乏用餐计划与低收入家庭的粮食不安全状况有关。
Econ Hum Biol. 2016 May;21:147-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
4
Time spent on home food preparation and indicators of healthy eating.花在家用食物制备上的时间与健康饮食指标
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):796-802. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.033. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
5
The Thrifty Food Plan is not thrifty when labor cost is considered.当考虑到劳动力成本时,节俭食品计划并不节俭。
J Nutr. 2010 Apr;140(4):854-7. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.119594. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
6
Time scarcity and food choices: an overview.时间稀缺与食物选择:概述
Appetite. 2006 Sep;47(2):196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.014. Epub 2006 May 15.

《美国救援计划法案》是一个良好的开端,但由于隐性的削减,补充营养援助计划(SNAP)福利可能需要进一步增加。

The American Rescue Plan Act Is a Great Start but More Increases in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefits Are Likely Needed Due to Implicit Hidden Reductions.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

出版信息

J Nutr. 2021 Aug 7;151(8):2099-2104. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab125.

DOI:10.1093/jn/nxab125
PMID:34036342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8194615/
Abstract

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is intended to help low-income individuals reach the cost of a nutritious diet. In response to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, SNAP benefits have been increased by 20.3% since October 2020. Given the intended goal of the program, is the 20.3% increase enough? Even prior to COVID-19, the literature had identified 3 separate shortcomings in the current formula that had not been addressed. Here, these shortcomings are integrated into a unifying framework that allows for a comparison between an adjusted formula, that accounts for all these shortcomings, and the current unadjusted formula, that does not account for these shortcomings. Using some average data from the literature, the current unadjusted formula gives the misleading impression that the government will provide 71% of the cost of a nutritious diet with households responsible for 29%. However, working with the adjusted formula, that takes into account the shortcomings, reveals the government actually only provides 41% of the adjusted cost of a nutritious diet and households are responsible for 59%. Some actual and recommended adjustments are shown to fall far short of the full adjustment required to reach a nutritious diet, on average. In particular, the 20.3% increase is less than half of the amount needed to fully correct for these omissions.

摘要

补充营养援助计划(SNAP)旨在帮助低收入个人达到营养饮食的成本。为了应对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,自 2020 年 10 月以来,SNAP 福利增加了 20.3%。考虑到该计划的预期目标,20.3%的增幅是否足够?即使在 COVID-19 之前,文献也已经确定了当前公式中未解决的 3 个单独的缺点。在这里,这些缺点被整合到一个统一的框架中,可以在考虑到所有这些缺点的调整公式和不考虑这些缺点的当前未调整公式之间进行比较。使用文献中的一些平均数据,当前的未调整公式给人一种错误的印象,即政府将承担营养饮食成本的 71%,而家庭只需承担 29%。然而,使用调整后的公式,考虑到这些缺点,揭示了政府实际上只提供了营养饮食调整后成本的 41%,而家庭则承担了 59%。一些实际和建议的调整显示,与达到营养饮食所需的全面调整相比,差距很大。特别是,20.3%的增幅还不到全面纠正这些遗漏所需的一半。