Suppr超能文献

《美国救援计划法案》是一个良好的开端,但由于隐性的削减,补充营养援助计划(SNAP)福利可能需要进一步增加。

The American Rescue Plan Act Is a Great Start but More Increases in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefits Are Likely Needed Due to Implicit Hidden Reductions.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

出版信息

J Nutr. 2021 Aug 7;151(8):2099-2104. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab125.

Abstract

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is intended to help low-income individuals reach the cost of a nutritious diet. In response to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, SNAP benefits have been increased by 20.3% since October 2020. Given the intended goal of the program, is the 20.3% increase enough? Even prior to COVID-19, the literature had identified 3 separate shortcomings in the current formula that had not been addressed. Here, these shortcomings are integrated into a unifying framework that allows for a comparison between an adjusted formula, that accounts for all these shortcomings, and the current unadjusted formula, that does not account for these shortcomings. Using some average data from the literature, the current unadjusted formula gives the misleading impression that the government will provide 71% of the cost of a nutritious diet with households responsible for 29%. However, working with the adjusted formula, that takes into account the shortcomings, reveals the government actually only provides 41% of the adjusted cost of a nutritious diet and households are responsible for 59%. Some actual and recommended adjustments are shown to fall far short of the full adjustment required to reach a nutritious diet, on average. In particular, the 20.3% increase is less than half of the amount needed to fully correct for these omissions.

摘要

补充营养援助计划(SNAP)旨在帮助低收入个人达到营养饮食的成本。为了应对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,自 2020 年 10 月以来,SNAP 福利增加了 20.3%。考虑到该计划的预期目标,20.3%的增幅是否足够?即使在 COVID-19 之前,文献也已经确定了当前公式中未解决的 3 个单独的缺点。在这里,这些缺点被整合到一个统一的框架中,可以在考虑到所有这些缺点的调整公式和不考虑这些缺点的当前未调整公式之间进行比较。使用文献中的一些平均数据,当前的未调整公式给人一种错误的印象,即政府将承担营养饮食成本的 71%,而家庭只需承担 29%。然而,使用调整后的公式,考虑到这些缺点,揭示了政府实际上只提供了营养饮食调整后成本的 41%,而家庭则承担了 59%。一些实际和建议的调整显示,与达到营养饮食所需的全面调整相比,差距很大。特别是,20.3%的增幅还不到全面纠正这些遗漏所需的一半。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验