Mills Susanna, White Martin, Brown Heather, Wrieden Wendy, Kwasnicka Dominika, Halligan Joel, Robalino Shannon, Adams Jean
Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK; Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Appetite. 2017 Apr 1;111:116-134. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.022. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
Many dietary interventions assume a positive influence of home cooking on diet, health and social outcomes, but evidence remains inconsistent. We aimed to systematically review health and social determinants and outcomes of home cooking. Given the absence of a widely accepted, established definition, we defined home cooking as the actions required for preparing hot or cold foods at home, including combining, mixing and often heating ingredients. Nineteen electronic databases were searched for relevant literature. Peer-reviewed studies in English were included if they focussed mainly on home cooking, and presented post 19 century observational or qualitative data on participants from high/very high human development index countries. Interventional study designs, which have previously been reviewed, were excluded. Themes were summarised using narrative synthesis. From 13,341 unique records, 38 studies - primarily cross-sectional in design - met the inclusion criteria. A conceptual model was developed, mapping determinants of home cooking to layers of influence including non-modifiable, individual, community and cultural factors. Key determinants included female gender, greater time availability and employment, close personal relationships, and culture and ethnic background. Putative outcomes were mostly at an individual level and focused on potential dietary benefits. Findings show that determinants of home cooking are more complex than simply possessing cooking skills, and that potential positive associations between cooking, diet and health require further confirmation. Current evidence is limited by reliance on cross-sectional studies and authors' conceptualisation of determinants and outcomes.
许多饮食干预措施都认为家庭烹饪对饮食、健康和社会成果具有积极影响,但相关证据仍不一致。我们旨在系统地综述家庭烹饪的健康和社会决定因素及成果。鉴于缺乏广泛接受的既定定义,我们将家庭烹饪定义为在家中准备热食或冷食所需的行为,包括食材的组合、混合以及通常的加热过程。我们在19个电子数据库中搜索了相关文献。纳入的英文同行评审研究主要聚焦于家庭烹饪,并呈现了19世纪后关于人类发展指数高/非常高的国家参与者的观察性或定性数据。此前已被综述的干预性研究设计被排除在外。我们使用叙述性综合法总结了相关主题。从13341条独特记录中,有38项研究(主要为横断面设计)符合纳入标准。我们构建了一个概念模型,将家庭烹饪的决定因素映射到包括不可改变因素、个体因素、社区因素和文化因素在内的影响层面。关键决定因素包括女性性别、更多的可支配时间和就业情况、亲密的人际关系以及文化和种族背景。假定的成果大多在个体层面,且聚焦于潜在的饮食益处。研究结果表明,家庭烹饪的决定因素比单纯具备烹饪技能更为复杂,烹饪、饮食和健康之间潜在的正向关联需要进一步证实。目前的证据受到依赖横断面研究以及作者对决定因素和成果的概念化的限制。