Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300074, People's Republic of China.
Department of Psychology, University of Northumbria, Newcastle, UK.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Nov;83(8):3146-3161. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02322-0. Epub 2021 May 25.
Wang et al. (Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, in press, 2021) reported a Landolt-C learning and scanning experiment. In a learning session, they simulated exposure frequency effects successfully by training participants to learn target Landolt-C clusters with different exposures. The rate of learning high-frequency (HF) targets were greater than that of learning low-frequency (LF) targets. In a subsequent scanning session, participants were required to scan text-like Landolt-C strings to detect whether any pre-learnt target was embedded in the strings. The Landolt-C strings were displayed under different spacing formats (i.e., spaced format, unspaced format, and unspaced shaded format). However, the simulated exposure frequency effect did not occur in the scanning session. Wang et al. argued one straightforward reason for this might be because participants failed to maintain the memory of pre-learnt target to the scanning session. In the current study, we employed the same learning and scanning paradigm to investigate whether exposure frequency would occur in a target search task by using easier learning materials - pseudoword stimuli. The learning of pseudoword stimuli was much more successful than Landolt-C stimuli. Interestingly, however, we found a very different rate of learning effect such that the rate of learning LF targets was greater than HF targets. To our surprise, we did not find any influence of exposure frequency on eye movements during scanning even when participants were able to identify pre-learnt pseudowords in strings. Learning rate effect, exposure frequency effects, and saccadic targeting during the scanning of strings under different spacing formats are discussed in this paper.
王等人(《注意、感知与心理物理学》,即将出版,2021 年)报告了一项兰多尔特-C 学习和扫描实验。在学习阶段,他们通过训练参与者用不同的曝光度来学习目标兰多尔特-C 图形,成功模拟了曝光频率效应。高频(HF)目标的学习速度快于低频(LF)目标。在随后的扫描阶段,参与者需要扫描类文字兰多尔特-C 图形以检测是否在字符串中嵌入了任何预先学习的目标。兰多尔特-C 图形显示在不同的间隔格式下(即间隔格式、无间隔格式和无间隔阴影格式)。然而,在扫描阶段并没有出现模拟的曝光频率效应。王等人认为,出现这种情况的一个直接原因可能是参与者未能将预先学习的目标的记忆保持到扫描阶段。在本研究中,我们采用相同的学习和扫描范式,通过使用更简单的学习材料——假词刺激来研究目标搜索任务中是否会出现曝光频率效应。假词刺激的学习比兰多尔特-C 刺激更成功。然而,有趣的是,我们发现了一个非常不同的学习效果,即 LF 目标的学习速度快于 HF 目标。令我们惊讶的是,即使参与者能够在字符串中识别预先学习的假词,我们也没有发现曝光频率对扫描过程中的眼动有任何影响。本文讨论了在不同间隔格式下扫描字符串时的学习率效应、曝光频率效应和眼跳定位。