Liu Yanping, Yu Lei, Reichle Erik D
Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Mar;45(3):535-543. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000595. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
This article reports an eye-movement experiment in which participants scanned continuous sequences of Landolt-s for target circles to examine the visual and oculomotor constraints that might jointly determine where the eyes move in a task that engages many of the perceptual and motor processes involved in Chinese reading but without lexical or linguistic processing. The lengths of the saccades entering the Landolt- clusters were modulated by the processing difficulty (i.e., gap sizes) of those clusters. Simulations using implemented versions of default-targeting (Yan, Kliegl, Richter, Nuthmann, & Shu, 2010) versus dynamic-adjustment (Liu, Reichle, & Li, 2016) models of saccadic targeting indicated that the latter provided a better account of our participants' eye movements, further supporting the hypothesis that Chinese readers "decide" where to move their eyes by adjusting saccade length in response to processing difficulty rather than by selecting default saccade targets. We discuss this hypothesis in relation to both what is known about saccadic targeting during the reading of English versus Chinese and current models of eye-movement control in reading. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
本文报告了一项眼动实验,在该实验中,参与者扫描连续的兰多尔特环序列以寻找目标圆圈,以检验视觉和眼动约束条件,这些约束条件可能共同决定在一项涉及中文阅读中许多感知和运动过程但不涉及词汇或语言处理的任务中眼睛的移动位置。进入兰多尔特环簇的扫视长度受到这些簇的处理难度(即间隙大小)的调节。使用已实现的默认目标定位模型(Yan、Kliegl、Richter、Nuthmann和Shu,2010)与动态调整模型(Liu、Reichle和Li,2016)对扫视目标定位进行模拟,结果表明后者能更好地解释我们参与者的眼动情况,进一步支持了这样一种假设,即中文读者通过根据处理难度调整扫视长度而非选择默认扫视目标来“决定”眼睛的移动位置。我们结合阅读英文和中文时扫视目标定位的已知情况以及当前阅读中眼动控制模型来讨论这一假设。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)