Suppr超能文献

中文阅读过程中扫视的动态调整:来自眼动和模拟的证据。

The dynamic adjustment of saccades during Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements and simulations.

作者信息

Liu Yanping, Yu Lei, Reichle Erik D

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Mar;45(3):535-543. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000595. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

Abstract

This article reports an eye-movement experiment in which participants scanned continuous sequences of Landolt-s for target circles to examine the visual and oculomotor constraints that might jointly determine where the eyes move in a task that engages many of the perceptual and motor processes involved in Chinese reading but without lexical or linguistic processing. The lengths of the saccades entering the Landolt- clusters were modulated by the processing difficulty (i.e., gap sizes) of those clusters. Simulations using implemented versions of default-targeting (Yan, Kliegl, Richter, Nuthmann, & Shu, 2010) versus dynamic-adjustment (Liu, Reichle, & Li, 2016) models of saccadic targeting indicated that the latter provided a better account of our participants' eye movements, further supporting the hypothesis that Chinese readers "decide" where to move their eyes by adjusting saccade length in response to processing difficulty rather than by selecting default saccade targets. We discuss this hypothesis in relation to both what is known about saccadic targeting during the reading of English versus Chinese and current models of eye-movement control in reading. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本文报告了一项眼动实验,在该实验中,参与者扫描连续的兰多尔特环序列以寻找目标圆圈,以检验视觉和眼动约束条件,这些约束条件可能共同决定在一项涉及中文阅读中许多感知和运动过程但不涉及词汇或语言处理的任务中眼睛的移动位置。进入兰多尔特环簇的扫视长度受到这些簇的处理难度(即间隙大小)的调节。使用已实现的默认目标定位模型(Yan、Kliegl、Richter、Nuthmann和Shu,2010)与动态调整模型(Liu、Reichle和Li,2016)对扫视目标定位进行模拟,结果表明后者能更好地解释我们参与者的眼动情况,进一步支持了这样一种假设,即中文读者通过根据处理难度调整扫视长度而非选择默认扫视目标来“决定”眼睛的移动位置。我们结合阅读英文和中文时扫视目标定位的已知情况以及当前阅读中眼动控制模型来讨论这一假设。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

7
Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.探究中文阅读中的词长效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1831-1841. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000589.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Chinese versus English: Insights on Cognition during Reading.中文与英文:阅读过程中的认知洞察
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Oct;21(10):721-724. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验