• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫苗分配中的伦理考虑

Ethical Considerations in Vaccine Allocation.

机构信息

Alden March Bioethics Institute, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.

Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.

出版信息

Immunol Invest. 2021 Oct;50(7):857-867. doi: 10.1080/08820139.2021.1924771. Epub 2021 May 26.

DOI:10.1080/08820139.2021.1924771
PMID:34036865
Abstract

In an effort to establish a consensus position on the ethical principles and ideals that should guide vaccine allocation during the Covid-19 pandemic, various organizations, including the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, released sample allocation frameworks to help guide government entities charged with distributing vaccine doses. One area of agreement among these reports is that front line health care workers, especially those who come into regular contact with Covid-19 patients, ought to be afforded highest priority. But this convergence, though significant, raises questions concerning the ethics of vaccine distribution those highest-priority health care workers: If a hospital has inadequate supply to vaccinate its entire workforce, which of its essential workers should it prioritize? In this paper, we begin with a general overview of ethical questions of vaccine administration before narrowing our focus to some of the most pressing theoretical and practical issues hospital officials must face in building justifiable and actionable frameworks for vaccinating their workers. We discuss and assess some potential ambitions of hospital allocation plans, concentrating especially on the goal of protecting the community from catastrophic loss of life. Finally, we consider some specific questions hospitals will encounter when developing distribution guidelines that aim to realize this aspiration.

摘要

为了在新冠疫情期间就指导疫苗分配的伦理原则和理想达成共识,包括疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和国家科学院、工程院、医学院在内的各种组织发布了疫苗分配框架样本,以帮助指导负责分发疫苗剂量的政府实体。这些报告的一个共识领域是,一线医护人员,尤其是那些经常接触新冠患者的医护人员,应优先接种疫苗。但这种趋同虽然意义重大,但也引发了一些关于疫苗分配伦理的问题,即那些优先级最高的医护人员:如果医院的疫苗供应不足以为其全体员工接种疫苗,应该优先为哪些关键员工接种疫苗?在本文中,我们首先对疫苗接种的伦理问题进行了概述,然后将重点缩小到医院官员在为其员工制定合理且可行的疫苗接种框架时必须面对的一些最紧迫的理论和实际问题。我们讨论和评估了一些医院分配计划的潜在目标,特别关注保护社区免受灾难性生命损失的目标。最后,我们考虑了医院在制定旨在实现这一愿望的分配准则时将遇到的一些具体问题。

相似文献

1
Ethical Considerations in Vaccine Allocation.疫苗分配中的伦理考虑
Immunol Invest. 2021 Oct;50(7):857-867. doi: 10.1080/08820139.2021.1924771. Epub 2021 May 26.
2
Developing a Framework for Pandemic COVID-19 Vaccine Allocation: a Modified Delphi Consensus Study in Korea.制定大流行 COVID-19 疫苗分配框架:韩国的一项改良德尔菲共识研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jun 14;36(23):e166. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e166.
3
BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine and correlates of humoral immune responses and dynamics: a prospective, single-centre, longitudinal cohort study in health-care workers.BNT162b2 新冠病毒疫苗与体液免疫应答及动力学的相关性:医护人员前瞻性、单中心、纵向队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Sep;9(9):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00220-4. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Why should HCWs receive priority access to vaccines in a pandemic?在大流行期间,医护人员为何应优先获得疫苗?
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 27;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00650-2.
5
Considerations for fair prioritization of COVID-19 vaccine and its mandate among healthcare personnel.医疗保健人员 COVID-19 疫苗公平优先排序及其授权的考虑因素。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Jun;37(6):907-909. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1908245. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
6
Antibody responses after a single dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in healthcare workers previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.在先前感染过 SARS-CoV-2 的医护人员中,单次接种 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 疫苗后的抗体反应。
EBioMedicine. 2021 Aug;70:103523. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103523. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
7
Using BCG vaccine to enhance non-specific protection of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Denmark.在新冠疫情期间使用卡介苗增强医护人员的非特异性防护:丹麦一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结
Trials. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04714-3.
8
Ethical allocation of COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: an evaluation of competing frameworks for the current pandemic and future events.美国 COVID-19 疫苗的伦理分配:对当前大流行和未来事件的竞争框架的评估。
J Public Health Policy. 2022 Jun;43(2):234-250. doi: 10.1057/s41271-022-00338-w. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
9
COVID-19 Vaccine: Practical Clinical Considerations.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗:实用临床注意事项。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 May;174(5):694. doi: 10.7326/M21-1260. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy.评估美国 COVID-19 疫苗分配策略。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 17;16(11):e0259700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259700. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Wait-times benchmarks for risk-based prioritization in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a simulation study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中基于风险的优先排序的等待时间基准:一项模拟研究。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2025 Jan 16;11(1):10-18. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae059.
2
Africa (COVID-19) Vaccine Technology Transfer: Where Are We?非洲(新冠病毒)疫苗技术转让:我们目前的进展如何?
Life (Basel). 2023 Sep 9;13(9):1886. doi: 10.3390/life13091886.
3
Hesitancy towards the COVID-19 vaccine among health care practitioners in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.
沙特阿拉伯医护人员对接种 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫态度:一项横断面研究。
F1000Res. 2023 Jun 12;11:24. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.74575.6. eCollection 2022.
4
Ethical considerations of the vaccine development process and vaccination: a scoping review.疫苗研发和接种过程中的伦理考量:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09237-6.
5
Developing a longitudinal database of surgical skills performance for practicing surgeons: A formal feasibility and acceptance inquiry.为执业外科医生建立手术技能表现的纵向数据库:一项正式的可行性和可接受性调查。
Am J Surg. 2022 Jul;224(1 Pt B):391-395. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.035. Epub 2022 Jan 1.