Drug Design and Development Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland; and Aristea Translational Medicine Corp, Park City, Utah.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2021 Jun 1;209(6):398-402. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001342.
After a long and torturous path, an elusive quest for structure and order may have misled the American Psychiatric Association to overexpand the scope of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) codification of mental disorders. The DSM and guidelines came to represent American psychiatry to the world. Although important for epidemiological and statistical research, in volume and complexity, the DSM challenges clinicians. The DSM effort at categorization must be reconceived to acknowledge modern biological realities. Molecular and other selective biological sciences no longer dominate biology as they did at the time of DSM's initial conception. Today, a Darwinian-Hippocratic combined biology leads psychiatry to address individuals and populations irretrievably and uniquely interdependent with environments. Unfortunately, the DSM, as currently conceived, fails to support this emerging 21st century biological grounding for psychiatry.
经过漫长而曲折的道路,对结构和秩序的难以捉摸的追求可能误导了美国精神病学协会过度扩大其《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)的精神障碍分类范围。DSM 和指南成为美国精神病学向世界展示的代表。尽管DSM 对于流行病学和统计研究非常重要,但它的体量和复杂性对临床医生来说是一个挑战。DSM 的分类工作必须重新构想,以承认现代生物学的现实。分子和其他选择性生物学科学不再像 DSM 最初构思时那样主导生物学。如今,一种达尔文-希波克拉底综合生物学促使精神病学解决个体和群体问题,这些个体和群体与环境不可挽回地、独特地相互依存。不幸的是,目前构想的 DSM 未能支持精神病学这一新兴的 21 世纪生物学基础。