Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):9479-9488. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07984-w. Epub 2021 May 26.
To explain the new changes in pathologic diagnoses of biphenotypic primary liver cancer (PLC) according to the updated 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and how it impacts Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classification using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI).
We retrospectively included 209 patients with pathologically proven biphenotypic PLCs according to the 2010 WHO classification who had undergone preoperative Gd-EOB-MRI between January 2009 and December 2018. Imaging analysis including LI-RADS classification and pathologic review including the proportion of tumor components were performed. Frequencies of each diagnosis and subtype according to the 2010 and 2019 WHO classifications were compared, and changes in LI-RADS classification were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to determine significant tumor component for LI-RADS classification.
Of the 209 biphenotypic PLCs of the 2010 WHO classification, 177 (84.7%) were diagnosed as bipheonotypic PLCs, 25 (12.0%) as hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and 7 (3.3%) as cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) using the 2019 WHO classification. Of the 177 biphenotypic PLCs, LR-M, LR-4, and LR-5 were assigned in 77 (43.5%), 21 (11.9%), and 63 (35.5%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the proportion of LR-5 and LR-M categories between the WHO 2010 and 2019 classifications (p = 0.941). Proportion of HCC component was the only independent factor for LI-RADS classification (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; p < 0.001).
According to the 2019 WHO classification, 15% of biphenotypic PLCs from the 2010 WHO classification were re-diagnosed as HCCs or CCAs, and a substantial proportion of biphenotypic PLCs of the 2019 WHO classification could be categorized as LR-4 or LR-5 on Gd-EOB-MRI.
• Among 209 diagnosed biphenotypic PLCs according to the 2010 WHO classification, 177 (84.7%) lesions were reclassified as bipheonotypic PLCs, 25 (12.0%) as HCCs, and 7 (3.3%) as CCAs using the 2019 WHO classification. • Of the 177 biphenotypic PLCs at the 2019 WHO classification, LR-M, LR-4, and LR-5 were assigned in 77 (43.5%), 21 (11.9%), and 63 (35.5%), respectively. • LI-RADS classification relied on the proportion of HCC component (adjusted odds ratio,1.02; p < 0.001).
根据 2019 年世界卫生组织(WHO)分类,解释原发性双表型肝癌(PLC)病理诊断的新变化,以及其对钆塞酸增强 MRI(Gd-EOB-MRI)的 Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System(LI-RADS)分类的影响。
我们回顾性纳入了 2009 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间根据 2010 年 WHO 分类经术前 Gd-EOB-MRI 证实的 209 例病理证实的双表型 PLC 患者。进行影像学分析,包括 LI-RADS 分类和病理复查,包括肿瘤成分的比例。比较 2010 年和 2019 年 WHO 分类的每种诊断和亚型的频率,并评估 LI-RADS 分类的变化。进行单变量和多变量分析,以确定 LI-RADS 分类的显著肿瘤成分。
在 209 例 2010 年 WHO 分类的双表型 PLC 中,177 例(84.7%)被诊断为双表型 PLC,25 例(12.0%)为肝细胞癌(HCC),7 例(3.3%)为胆管癌(CCA)根据 2019 年 WHO 分类。在 177 例双表型 PLC 中,LR-M、LR-4 和 LR-5 分别分配给 77 例(43.5%)、21 例(11.9%)和 63 例(35.5%)。在 WHO 2010 年和 2019 年分类中,LR-5 和 LR-M 类别的比例没有显著差异(p=0.941)。HCC 成分的比例是 LI-RADS 分类的唯一独立因素(调整比值比,1.02;p<0.001)。
根据 2019 年 WHO 分类,在 2010 年 WHO 分类中的 15%的双表型 PLC 被重新诊断为 HCC 或 CCA,并且 2019 年 WHO 分类中的相当一部分双表型 PLC 可以在 Gd-EOB-MRI 上分类为 LR-4 或 LR-5。
• 在根据 2010 年 WHO 分类诊断的 209 例双表型 PLC 中,177 例(84.7%)病变重新分类为双表型 PLC,25 例(12.0%)为 HCC,7 例(3.3%)为 CCA 根据 2019 年 WHO 分类。• 在 2019 年 WHO 分类的 177 例双表型 PLC 中,LR-M、LR-4 和 LR-5 分别分配给 77 例(43.5%)、21 例(11.9%)和 63 例(35.5%)。• LI-RADS 分类依赖于 HCC 成分的比例(调整比值比,1.02;p<0.001)。