Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3708 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):996-1007. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06448-6. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
To determine whether the LI-RADS imaging features of primary liver carcinomas (PLCs) other than hepatocellular carcinoma (non-HCC PLCs) differ between patients considered high risk (RF+) versus not high risk (RF-) for HCC and to compare rates of miscategorization as probable or definite HCC between the RF+ and RF- populations.
This retrospective study included all pathology-proven non-HCC PLCs imaged with liver-protocol CT or MRI from 2007 to 2017 at two liver transplant centers. Patients were defined per LI-RADS v2018 criteria as RF+ or RF-. Two independent, blinded readers (R1, R2) categorized 265 lesions using LI-RADS v2018. Logistic regression was utilized to assess for differences in imaging feature frequencies between RF+ and RF- patients. Fisher's exact test was used to assess for differences in miscategorization rates.
Non-HCC PLCs were significantly more likely to exhibit nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (R1: OR = 2.94; R2: OR = 7.09) and nonperipheral "washout" (R1: OR = 3.65; R2: OR = 7.69) but significantly less likely to exhibit peripheral "washout" (R1: OR = 0.30; R2: OR = 0.10) and delayed central enhancement (R1: OR = 0.18; R2: OR = 0.25) in RF+ patients relative to RF- patients. Consequently, non-HCC PLCs were more often miscategorized as probable or definite HCC in RF+ versus RF- patients (R1: 23.3% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001; R2: 11.0% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.009).
Non-HCC PLCs are more likely to mimic HCCs on CT and MRI in the LI-RADS target population than in patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors.
• The presence of LI-RADS-defined risk factors for HCC tends to alter the imaging appearances of non-HCC PLCs, resulting in higher frequencies of major features and lower frequencies of LR-M features. • Non-HCC PLCs are more likely to be miscategorized as probable or definite HCC in the LI-RADS target population than in patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors.
确定原发性肝癌(PLC)的 LI-RADS 影像学特征是否在考虑 HCC 高危(RF+)与非高危(RF-)的患者之间存在差异,并比较 RF+和 RF-人群中 HCC 可能性或确定性分类错误的发生率。
本回顾性研究纳入了 2007 年至 2017 年间在两个肝移植中心行肝脏协议 CT 或 MRI 检查并经病理证实的所有非 HCC PLC。根据 LI-RADS v2018 标准,患者被定义为 RF+或 RF-。两位独立的、盲法的读者(R1、R2)使用 LI-RADS v2018 对 265 个病灶进行分类。采用逻辑回归评估 RF+和 RF-患者之间影像学特征频率的差异。采用 Fisher 确切检验评估分类错误率的差异。
非 HCC PLC 更可能表现出非环形动脉期强化(R1:OR=2.94;R2:OR=7.09)和非外周“洗脱”(R1:OR=3.65;R2:OR=7.69),但更可能表现出外周“洗脱”(R1:OR=0.30;R2:OR=0.10)和延迟中央强化(R1:OR=0.18;R2:OR=0.25)的可能性较低在 RF+患者中相对 RF-患者。因此,非 HCC PLC 在 RF+患者中更常被误诊为可能或明确 HCC(R1:23.3%比 3.6%,p<0.001;R2:11.0%比 2.6%,p=0.009)。
在 LI-RADS 目标人群中,与没有 LI-RADS 定义的 HCC 危险因素的患者相比,非 HCC PLC 在 CT 和 MRI 上更可能模拟 HCC。
存在 HCC 的 LI-RADS 定义危险因素往往会改变非 HCC PLC 的影像学表现,导致主要特征的频率增加,LR-M 特征的频率降低。
在 LI-RADS 目标人群中,非 HCC PLC 更有可能被误诊为可能或明确 HCC,而在没有 LI-RADS 定义的 HCC 危险因素的患者中则不太可能。