Sociology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0251960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251960. eCollection 2021.
Social distancing prescribed by policy makers in response to COVID-19 raises important questions as to how effectively people of color can distance. Due to inequalities from residential segregation, Hispanic and Black populations have challenges in meeting health expectations. However, segregated neighborhoods also support the formation of social bonds that relate to healthy behaviors. We evaluate the question of non-White distancing using social mobility data from Google on three sites: workplaces, grocery stores, and recreational locations. Employing hierarchical linear modeling and geographically weighted regression, we find the relation of race/ethnicity to COVID-19 distancing is varied across the United States. The HLM models show that compared to Black populations, Hispanic populations overall more effectively distance from recreation sites and grocery stores: each point increase in percent Hispanic was related to residents being 0.092 percent less likely (p< 0.05) to visit recreational sites and 0.127 percent less likely (p< 0.01) to visit grocery stores since the onset of COVID-19. However, the GWR models show there are places where the percent Black is locally related to recreation distancing while percent Hispanic is not. Further, these models show the association of percent Black to recreation and grocery distancing can be locally as strong as 1.057 percent (p< 0.05) and 0.989 percent (p< 0.05), respectively. Next, the HLM models identified that Black/White residential isolation was related to less distancing, with each point of isolation residents were 11.476 percent more likely (p< 0.01) to go to recreational sites and 7.493 percent more likely (p< 0.05) to visit grocery stores compared to before COVID-19. These models did not find a measurable advantage/disadvantage for Black populations in these places compared to White populations. COVID-19 policy should not assume disadvantage in achieving social distancing accrue equally to different racial/ethnic minorities.
政策制定者为应对 COVID-19 而规定的社交距离措施引发了一个重要问题,即有色人种如何能有效地保持社交距离。由于居住隔离造成的不平等,西班牙裔和非裔人口在达到健康预期方面面临挑战。然而,隔离的社区也支持形成与健康行为相关的社会联系。我们利用谷歌提供的三个地点(工作场所、杂货店和娱乐场所)的社会流动数据来评估非白人保持社交距离的问题。我们采用层次线性建模和地理加权回归方法,发现种族/族裔与 COVID-19 保持社交距离的关系在美国各地各不相同。HLM 模型显示,与黑人人口相比,西班牙裔人口总体上更有效地远离娱乐场所和杂货店:西班牙裔人口比例每增加 1%,居民前往娱乐场所的可能性就会降低 0.092%(p<0.05),前往杂货店的可能性降低 0.127%(p<0.01),自 COVID-19 爆发以来。然而,GWR 模型显示,在某些地方,黑人比例与娱乐场所保持社交距离有关,而西班牙裔比例则没有。此外,这些模型还显示,黑人比例与娱乐和杂货店保持社交距离的关联在局部地区可能高达 1.057%(p<0.05)和 0.989%(p<0.05)。其次,HLM 模型确定,黑人和白人的居住隔离与较少的社交距离有关,与 COVID-19 爆发前相比,每隔离一点,居民前往娱乐场所的可能性增加 11.476%(p<0.01),前往杂货店的可能性增加 7.493%(p<0.05)。这些模型没有发现与白人相比,黑人在这些地方实现社交距离的优势/劣势可衡量。COVID-19 政策不应假设不同种族/族裔少数群体在实现社交距离方面的劣势是平等的。