Pharmaceutical Health Services Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;194:105-127. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
There is a growing literature demonstrating the health benefits of social capital (defined as the resources accessed through social connections). However, social capital is also acknowledged to be a "double-edged" phenomenon, whose effects on health are not always positive. We sought to systematically review studies that have found a negative (i.e. harmful) association between social capital and health outcomes. Our objective was to classify the different types of negative effects, following a framework originally proposed by Portes (1998). We conducted a literature search in Pubmed, Embase and PsychInfo. We identified 3530 manuscripts. After detailed review, we included 44 articles in our systematic review. There are at least two negative consequences of social capital besides the classification proposed by Portes: behavioral contagion and cross-level interactions between social cohesion and individual characteristics. When leveraging the concept of social capital for health promotion interventions, researchers need to take account of these potential "downsides" for health outcomes.
越来越多的文献证明了社会资本(定义为通过社会关系获得的资源)对健康的益处。然而,社会资本也被认为是一种“双刃剑”现象,其对健康的影响并不总是积极的。我们试图系统地回顾那些发现社会资本与健康结果之间存在负面(即有害)关联的研究。我们的目标是按照 Portes(1998 年)提出的框架对不同类型的负面影响进行分类。我们在 Pubmed、Embase 和 PsychInfo 中进行了文献检索。我们确定了 3530 篇手稿。经过详细审查,我们在系统评价中纳入了 44 篇文章。除了 Portes 提出的分类之外,社会资本至少还有两个负面影响:行为传播和社会凝聚力与个体特征之间的跨层次相互作用。当为健康促进干预措施利用社会资本的概念时,研究人员需要考虑这些对健康结果的潜在“负面影响”。