Schachter J
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1988;36(2):455-80. doi: 10.1177/000306518803600209.
This paper's thesis is that concurrent individual-in-a-group and individual psychoanalytic psychotherapy can be conducted in conformance with psychoanalytic principles of treatment as well as can individual psychoanalytic psychotherapy alone. American psychoanalysts have shown little interest in group psychotherapy, probably because of earlier criticism that transference is diluted by the greater reality of the therapist in group psychotherapy. This is a misconception extrapolated from the mirror model of dyadic analytic technique. The criticism was formulated during a period when that model was prominent and there was little awareness that the actual personal relationship between patient and analyst played an important facilitating role in the dyadic analytic process, including providing a basis for investiture of transference. Also, the criticism was based on one-session-per-week group psychotherapy, whereas concurrent individual-in-a-group and individual psychoanalytic psychotherapy utilizes two group sessions plus one or two individual sessions per week, enabling a more intensive patient-therapist relationship. Concurrent group and individual psychoanalytic psychotherapy constitutes a contribution to the widening scope of application of psychoanalytic treatment.
本文的论点是,团体中的个体与个体精神分析心理治疗同时进行能够遵循精神分析治疗原则,单独的个体精神分析心理治疗也能做到这一点。美国精神分析学家对团体心理治疗兴趣寥寥,这可能是因为早期有人批评称,在团体心理治疗中,由于治疗师的现实性更强,移情会被削弱。这是从二元分析技术的镜像模型推断出的误解。该批评形成于那个模型占主导地位的时期,当时几乎没有人意识到患者与分析师之间实际的个人关系在二元分析过程中发挥着重要的促进作用,包括为移情的投入提供基础。此外,该批评基于每周一次的团体心理治疗,而团体中的个体与个体精神分析心理治疗同时进行则是每周利用两次团体治疗 session 以及一到两次个体治疗 session,从而能够建立更紧密的患者 - 治疗师关系。团体与个体精神分析心理治疗同时进行为扩大精神分析治疗的应用范围做出了贡献。