Debbane E G, De Carufel F
Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Am J Psychother. 1993 Fall;47(4):540-53. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1993.47.4.540.
Transference interpretation varies with the underlying understanding of the concept of transference. We view the phenomena of transference in its multiple connections; its relationship to countertransference, its relationship to a particular kind of remembering that unfolds in sequence rather than in representation and its relationship to working through. The transference is expressed in the context of a "total situation" and in order to unfold, requires a time-space frame which variation will modify the nature of the transference available for interpretation. The analytical frame applied to a group situation creates an environment that promotes rapid and sometimes massive regression. We have introduced the notion of levels of transference to account for the state of self/object differentiation present in the group. This varies with the amount of regression, and depends on the severity of splitting, projection and projective identification. In terms of transferential objects available in the group, we recognize the analyst, other members and the group as a whole. The latter carries the more primitive transference and the underlying phantasy structure of the group transactions. We briefly described some possible errors in the interpretation of transference and their potential consequences.
移情解释因对移情概念的潜在理解而异。我们从其多重关联的角度看待移情现象；它与反移情的关系、它与一种按顺序展开而非以表象形式呈现的特定记忆方式的关系以及它与修通的关系。移情是在“整体情境”的背景下表达的，并且为了展开，需要一个时空框架，该框架的变化会改变可供解释的移情的性质。应用于团体情境的分析框架创造了一种促进快速且有时是大规模退行的环境。我们引入了移情层次的概念来解释团体中自我/客体分化的状态。这随退行量而变化，并取决于分裂、投射和投射性认同的严重程度。就团体中可利用的移情对象而言，我们认可分析师、其他成员以及团体整体。团体整体承载着更原始的移情以及团体互动的潜在幻想结构。我们简要描述了移情解释中一些可能的错误及其潜在后果。
