Chea Branson, Bolt Andre, Agelin-Chaab Martin, Dincer Ibrahim
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7K4, Canada.
Phys Fluids (1994). 2021 May;33(5):051903. doi: 10.1063/5.0046429. Epub 2021 May 10.
Currently, COVID-19 is a global pandemic that scientists and engineers around the world are aiming to understand further through rigorous testing and observation. This paper aims to provide safe distance recommendations among individuals and minimize the spread of COVID-19, as well as examine the efficacy of face coverings as a tool to slow the spread of respiratory droplets. These studies are conducted using computational fluid dynamics analyses, where the infected person breathes, coughs, and sneezes at various distances and environmental wind conditions and while wearing a face-covering (mask or face shield). In cases where there were no wind conditions, the breathing and coughing simulations display 1-2 m physical distancing to be effective. However, when sneezing was introduced, the physical distancing recommendation of 2 m was deemed not effective; instead, a distance of 2.8 m and greater was found to be more effective in reducing the exposure to respiratory droplets. The evaluation of environmental wind conditions necessitated an increase in physical distancing measures in all cases. The case where breathing was measured with a gentle breeze resulted in a physical distancing recommendation of 1.1 m, while coughing caused a change from the previous recommendation of 2 m to a distance of 4.5 m or greater. Sneezing in the presence of a gentle breeze was deemed to be the most impactful, with a recommendation for physical distancing of 5.8 m or more. It was determined that face coverings can potentially provide protection to an uninfected person in static air conditions. However, the uninfected person's protection can be compromised even in gentle wind conditions.
目前,新冠病毒肺炎是一场全球大流行疾病,世界各地的科学家和工程师都致力于通过严格的测试和观察来进一步了解它。本文旨在提供个体之间的安全距离建议,以尽量减少新冠病毒肺炎的传播,并研究面部遮盖物作为减缓呼吸道飞沫传播工具的有效性。这些研究是通过计算流体动力学分析进行的,其中受感染的人在不同距离、环境风况下,以及佩戴面部遮盖物(口罩或面罩)时进行呼吸、咳嗽和打喷嚏。在没有风况的情况下,呼吸和咳嗽模拟显示保持1 - 2米的物理距离是有效的。然而,当引入打喷嚏的情况时,2米的物理距离建议被认为无效;相反,发现2.8米及更远的距离在减少呼吸道飞沫暴露方面更有效。对环境风况的评估表明,在所有情况下都需要增加物理距离措施。在微风情况下测量呼吸时,物理距离建议为1.1米,而咳嗽导致之前2米的建议距离变为4.5米或更远。在微风情况下打喷嚏被认为影响最大,物理距离建议为5.8米或更远。研究确定,面部遮盖物在静态空气条件下可能为未感染者提供保护。然而,即使在微风条件下,未感染者的保护也可能受到影响。