• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prevalence and Correlates of Sext-Sharing Among a Representative Sample of Youth in the Netherlands.荷兰青少年代表性样本中性分享行为的患病率及其相关因素
Front Psychol. 2021 May 10;12:655796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655796. eCollection 2021.
2
Understanding U.S. Caregivers' Perceptions of Youth's Sexting Motivations and Concerns About Their Children's Sexting Involvement: Fall ConsumerStyles Survey, 2018 and 2019.了解美国照顾者对青少年发送色情短信动机的看法,以及他们对子女参与发送色情短信的担忧:2018 年和 2019 年秋季消费者时尚调查。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Nov;53(10):3747-3757. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02989-0. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
3
Sexually explicit cell phone messaging associated with sexual risk among adolescents.青少年中与性行为相关的露骨手机短信。
Pediatrics. 2012 Oct;130(4):667-73. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0021. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
4
Sext Dissemination: Differences across Nations in Motivations and Associations.性传播:各国在动机及关联方面的差异
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 2;18(5):2429. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052429.
5
Sexting among singles in the USA: prevalence of sending, receiving, and sharing sexual messages and images.美国单身人群中的“性短信”行为:发送、接收及分享性信息和图片的流行情况。
Sex Health. 2016 Jul 29. doi: 10.1071/SH15240.
6
The Nature and Extent of Sexting Among a National Sample of Middle and High School Students in the U.S.美国中学生群体中发送色情短信行为的本质和程度
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Nov;48(8):2333-2343. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-1449-y. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
7
Sexting and sexual behavior among middle school students.中学生的发色情短信行为和性行为。
Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e21-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2991.
8
Effectiveness of a Theory-Based Digital Animated Video Intervention to Reduce Intention and Willingness to Sext Among Diploma Students: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于理论的数字动画视频干预减少大专生性行为意图和意愿的效果:整群随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 20;25:e48968. doi: 10.2196/48968.
9
A first investigation into gender minority adolescents' sexting experiences.首次调查性别少数青少年的发色情短信经历。
J Adolesc. 2020 Oct;84:213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
10
The Role of Consent and Motivations in Sext Dissemination.同意与动机在色情传播中的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Aug;38(15-16):9315-9342. doi: 10.1177/08862605231163886. Epub 2023 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation and adaptation of the diffusion of intimate images among adolescents (EDIMA) scale in adolescents from Peru.秘鲁青少年中亲密图像传播(EDIMA)量表的验证与改编
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 16;15:1399423. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1399423. eCollection 2024.
2
Risk Factors for Non-Consensual Sexting Among Adolescents and Emerging Adults: An Extension of the Routine Activity Theory Perspective.青少年和新兴成年人非自愿发性短信的风险因素:对常规活动理论视角的扩展。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jul;53(7):2583-2596. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02903-8. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3
A Latent Profile Analysis of the Consensual and Non-Consensual Sexting Experiences among Canadian Adolescents.加拿大青少年中自愿和非自愿性短信经历的潜在类别分析。
Youth Soc. 2024 May;56(4):713-733. doi: 10.1177/0044118X231202814. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
4
The Role of Consent and Motivations in Sext Dissemination.同意与动机在色情传播中的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Aug;38(15-16):9315-9342. doi: 10.1177/08862605231163886. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
Did They Deserve It? Adolescents' Perception of Online Harassment in a Real-Case Scenario.他们罪有应得吗?青少年对真实案例中网络骚扰的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17040. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417040.
6
Sexual Boundary Violations via Digital Media Among Students.学生中通过数字媒体进行的性边界侵犯行为
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 5;12:755752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755752. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Sext Dissemination: Differences across Nations in Motivations and Associations.性传播:各国在动机及关联方面的差异
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 2;18(5):2429. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052429.
2
Pornography use and sexting amongst children and young people: a systematic overview of reviews.儿童和青少年的色情制品使用和发色情短信行为:系统综述。
Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 6;9(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01541-0.
3
Non-consensual sexting: characteristics and motives of youths who share received-intimate content without consent.非自愿性传播亲密内容:未经同意分享所接收的亲密内容的青少年的特征与动机。
Sex Health. 2020 Jun 29. doi: 10.1071/SH19201.
4
Youth Internet Safety Education: Aligning Programs With the Evidence Base.青少年网络安全教育:使项目与证据基础保持一致。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Dec;22(5):1233-1247. doi: 10.1177/1524838020916257. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
5
Predicting the Willingness to Engage in Non-Consensual Forwarding of Sexts: The Role of Pornography and Instrumental Notions of Sex.预测非自愿转发色情短信的意愿:色情制品和工具性性观念的作用。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 May;49(4):1121-1132. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01580-2. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
6
It is Time to Teach Safe Sexting.是时候教授安全的性短信行为了。
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Feb;66(2):140-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.10.010. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
7
Longitudinal relationships between sexting and involvement in both bullying and cyberbullying.发送色情短信与卷入欺凌和网络欺凌之间的纵向关系。
J Adolesc. 2019 Dec;77:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
8
Nonconsensual Sharing of Private Sexually Explicit Media Among University Students.大学生非自愿分享私人色情媒体。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):NP9078-NP9108. doi: 10.1177/0886260519853414. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
9
Visual gossiping: non-consensual 'nude' sharing among young people in Denmark.视觉八卦:丹麦年轻人之间未经同意的“裸照”分享。
Cult Health Sex. 2019 Sep;21(9):1029-1044. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2018.1534140. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
[Sex under the age of 25 in 2017: the sexual health of young people in the Netherlands].《2017年25岁以下人群的性行为:荷兰年轻人的性健康状况》
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2018 May 17;162:D2734.

荷兰青少年代表性样本中性分享行为的患病率及其相关因素

Prevalence and Correlates of Sext-Sharing Among a Representative Sample of Youth in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Boer Sarah, Erdem Özcan, de Graaf Hanneke, Götz Hannelore

机构信息

Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Rutgers, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 May 10;12:655796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655796. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655796
PMID:34040564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8143518/
Abstract

Many adolescents use their electronic devices to send each other sexually explicit texts, photos, and videos of themselves-commonly known as sexting. This can be fun and is not usually problematic. However, if the intended recipient decides to share these sexts with a broader audience, the consequences for the depicted can be detrimental. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of (non-consensual) sext-sharing among Dutch adolescents and explore the characteristics of those who do, to gain a better understanding of factors involved in dissemination. We used data from "Sex under the age of 25," a representative national survey on sexual health among a sample of 20,834 Dutch 12-24-year-olds. The prevalence of sext-sharing was estimated using Complex Samples. Logistic regressions were used to assess associations between demographics, school-based sexting education, sexual- and online behavior, and mental health and sext-sharing. About 4% of the adolescents reported having shared someone else's sext in the last six months. Being male, aged 12-14 years, frequent social media usage, watching online porn, sexual experience, and being subjected to sext-sharing themselves associated most strongly with sext-sharing. Our findings show that the likelihood of sext-sharing is lower in older adolescents and that it associates with the extent of adolescents' sexual curiosity and online activity. The overlap between sharing sexts of others and having one's own sext shared suggests that dissemination of personal sexual content might be normalized or used as an act of retribution. Further research could be helpful to explain the mechanisms underlying this overlap. The results of this study illustrate the importance of exposing adolescents to evidence based preventive educational interventions on sexting from 12 years onwards and not just within the context of traditional school-based sex education, but also as a part of the (online) media-literacy curriculum.

摘要

许多青少年使用电子设备互相发送自己的露骨色情短信、照片和视频,也就是通常所说的“性短信”。这可能很有趣,通常也不会有问题。然而,如果预期收件人决定将这些性短信分享给更广泛的受众,那么对于照片或视频中的人来说,后果可能是有害的。本研究的目的是调查荷兰青少年中(非自愿)性短信分享的流行程度,并探究分享者的特征,以便更好地了解传播过程中的相关因素。我们使用了“25岁以下的性行为”的数据,这是一项针对20,834名荷兰12 - 24岁青少年样本进行的具有全国代表性的性健康调查。性短信分享的流行程度采用复杂抽样进行估计。使用逻辑回归来评估人口统计学特征、基于学校的性短信教育、性和网络行为以及心理健康与性短信分享之间的关联。约4%的青少年报告在过去六个月里分享过他人的性短信。男性、年龄在12 - 14岁、频繁使用社交媒体、观看网络色情内容、有性经历以及自己曾遭受性短信分享与性短信分享的关联最为紧密。我们的研究结果表明,年龄较大的青少年进行性短信分享的可能性较低,并且这与青少年的性好奇心和网络活动程度相关。分享他人性短信与自己的性短信被分享之间的重叠表明,个人性内容的传播可能已被正常化,或被用作一种报复行为。进一步的研究可能有助于解释这种重叠背后的机制。本研究结果表明,从12岁起就让青少年接受基于证据的预防性性短信教育干预非常重要,不仅要在传统的学校性教育背景下进行,还要作为(网络)媒体素养课程的一部分。