van Os S, Troop N, Ryder N, Hart D P
Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Psychology and Sport Sciences Department, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK.
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2018 Sep 24;6(1):277-300. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2018.1493384.
Reported levels of adherence to prophylaxis among young people with haemophilia (YPH) vary widely and are predominately based on estimations made by healthcare professionals and parents. Reasons for (non)adherence among YPH in particular have not been evidenced. to examine experiences in relation to prophylaxis with YPH themselves, and barriers and facilitators to their adherence. 11 Participants were recruited in five haemophilia centres across England and Wales. All patients who met the inclusion criteria (aged 12-25, diagnosed with haemophilia, on prophylaxis) were approached during a routine check-up appointment, and all participants who agreed to take part were interviewed. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Self-reported adherence to prophylaxis was good. Few participants admitted to intentionally skipping injections although they reported sometimes forgetting. However, due to the increasingly personalised and flexible approach to prophylaxis, adherence is not straightforward to define. Barriers to adherence included a busy lifestyle, dislike of the intravenous injection, venous access issues, anxiety or stress and being out of one's normal routine. Support was an important facilitator to adherence, including support from health professionals at the haemophilia centre as well as friends. Parents appear to be very involved with their child's haemophilia management, even after they leave home. What this study adds is that the increasingly flexible and personalised approach to managing prophylaxis in haemophilia may sometimes lead to confusion around treatment frequency and dosing. This may lead to accidental non-adherence, which is distinct from both skipping and forgetting. Advice from haemophilia teams may not always be consistent and is likely to be interpreted differently by different individuals. Some additional training and education of patients and their families to increase their knowledge and skills around prophylaxis may reduce this confusion and therefore is likely to improve adherence further.
血友病青年患者(YPH)的预防治疗依从性报告水平差异很大,且主要基于医疗保健专业人员和家长的估计。尤其是YPH患者(不)依从的原因尚无证据。本研究旨在调查YPH患者自身在预防治疗方面的经历,以及他们依从的障碍和促进因素。在英格兰和威尔士的五个血友病中心招募了11名参与者。所有符合纳入标准(年龄在12至25岁之间,诊断为血友病,正在接受预防治疗)的患者在常规检查预约期间被邀请参与,所有同意参与的参与者都接受了访谈。访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用解释现象学分析方法进行分析。自我报告的预防治疗依从性良好。很少有参与者承认故意跳过注射,尽管他们报告有时会忘记。然而,由于预防治疗的方法越来越个性化和灵活,依从性的定义并不简单。依从的障碍包括忙碌的生活方式、不喜欢静脉注射、静脉通路问题、焦虑或压力以及脱离正常生活规律。支持是依从的一个重要促进因素,包括来自血友病中心的医疗专业人员以及朋友的支持。即使孩子离家后,父母似乎仍非常参与孩子的血友病管理。本研究补充的内容是,血友病预防治疗管理中日益灵活和个性化的方法有时可能导致治疗频率和剂量方面的困惑。这可能导致意外不依从,这与跳过和忘记都不同。血友病团队的建议可能并不总是一致的,而且不同个体可能会有不同的理解。对患者及其家属进行一些额外的培训和教育,以增加他们在预防治疗方面的知识和技能,可能会减少这种困惑,因此可能会进一步提高依从性。