van Os S, Ryder N, Hart D P, Troop N
Psychology and Sport Sciences Department, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
The Royal London Hospital Haemophilia Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2020 Jan 28;8(1):55-72. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1718501.
to examine healthcare professionals' (HP) perceptions and experiences in relation to adherence to prophylactic treatment among young people living with haemophilia (YPH). All HPs in four haemophilia centres across England and Wales were invited to participate, and all HPs who agreed to take part ( = 6) were interviewed. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and then analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). HPs estimate that generally young people with haemophilia keep to their treatment regimen well, although they also recognise that adherence may fluctuate with many patients going through shorter periods of non-adherence. The increasingly personalised or flexible approach to prophylaxis makes it harder to assess adherence. The main themes identified through IPA included (1) HPs' suggest that adherence fluctuates (2) Non-adherence is mainly driven by lifestyle and developmental, social and family factors, and (3) Education, HPs' sensitivity to individual needs, and psychological and peer support are key facilitators of good adherence. The increasingly flexible approach to prophylaxis requires a new way of thinking about, and assessment of, adherence. More personalised treatment regimen can be more complicated and may, therefore, lead to accidental non-adherence. The results of this study with HPs complement those of a previous qualitative study with patients but place greater emphasis on a broader perspective on understanding drivers of non-adherence as well as understanding strategies to improve adherence in the minority of patients who appear to struggle.
考察医疗保健专业人员(HP)对于血友病青少年患者(YPH)预防性治疗依从性的看法和经历。邀请了英格兰和威尔士四个血友病中心的所有医疗保健专业人员参与,所有同意参与的医疗保健专业人员(n = 6)均接受了访谈。访谈进行了录音、转录,然后采用解释现象学分析(IPA)进行分析。医疗保健专业人员估计,一般来说,血友病青少年患者能很好地坚持治疗方案,不过他们也认识到依从性可能会波动,许多患者会经历较短时间的不依从。预防性治疗日益个性化或灵活的方式使得评估依从性变得更加困难。通过IPA确定的主要主题包括:(1)医疗保健专业人员认为依从性会波动;(2)不依从主要由生活方式、发育、社会和家庭因素驱动;(3)教育、医疗保健专业人员对个体需求的敏感度以及心理和同伴支持是良好依从性的关键促进因素。预防性治疗日益灵活的方式需要一种新的思考和评估依从性的方式。更个性化的治疗方案可能会更复杂,因此可能导致意外的不依从。这项针对医疗保健专业人员的研究结果补充了之前一项针对患者的定性研究结果,但更强调从更广泛的角度理解不依从的驱动因素,以及理解改善少数似乎难以坚持治疗的患者依从性的策略。