• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与手动方法相比,自动方法在皮肤活检中定量表皮内神经纤维的优势。

Advantages of an Automated Method Compared With Manual Methods for the Quantification of Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber in Skin Biopsy.

机构信息

From the Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto.

Instituto de investigação e inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto (i3S), Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2021 Aug 11;80(7):685-694. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlab045.

DOI:10.1093/jnen/nlab045
PMID:34041546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8357338/
Abstract

Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) measurements in skin biopsy are performed manually by 1-3 operators. To improve diagnostic accuracy and applicability in clinical practice, we developed an automated method for fast IENFD determination with low operator-dependency. Sixty skin biopsy specimens were stained with the axonal marker PGP9.5 and imaged using a widefield fluorescence microscope. IENFD was first determined manually by 3 independent observers. Subsequently, images were processed in their Z-max projection and the intradermal line was delineated automatically. IENFD was calculated automatically (fluorescent images automated counting [FIAC]) and compared with manual counting on the same fluorescence images (fluorescent images manual counting [FIMC]), and with classical manual counting (CMC) data. A FIMC showed lower variability among observers compared with CMC (interclass correlation [ICC] = 0.996 vs 0.950). FIMC and FIAC showed high reliability (ICC = 0.999). A moderate-to-high (ICC = 0.705) was observed between CMC and FIAC counting. The algorithm process took on average 15 seconds to perform FIAC counting, compared with 10 minutes for FIMC counting. This automated method rapidly and reliably detects small nerve fibers in skin biopsies with clear advantages over the classical manual technique.

摘要

表皮内神经纤维密度(IENFD)的测量是通过 1-3 名操作人员手动完成的。为了提高诊断准确性和临床实用性,我们开发了一种快速、低操作者依赖性的自动 IENFD 确定方法。对 60 个皮肤活检标本进行轴突标记物 PGP9.5 染色,并使用宽场荧光显微镜进行成像。首先由 3 名独立观察者手动确定 IENFD。随后,在 Z-最大值投影中处理图像,并自动描绘皮内线。自动计算 IENFD(荧光图像自动计数[FIAC]),并将其与相同荧光图像上的手动计数(荧光图像手动计数[FIMC])和经典手动计数(CMC)数据进行比较。与 CMC 相比,FIMC 显示出观察者之间更低的变异性(组内相关系数[ICC] = 0.996 比 0.950)。FIMC 和 FIAC 显示出高度的可靠性(ICC = 0.999)。在 CMC 和 FIAC 计数之间观察到中等至高(ICC = 0.705)的相关性。与 FIMC 计数相比,FIAC 计数的算法处理平均耗时 15 秒。与经典的手动技术相比,这种自动方法在皮肤活检中快速可靠地检测小神经纤维具有明显的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/610773daba49/nlab045f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/914f8fb79d53/nlab045f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/335dbe8c1d45/nlab045f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/652c8eb60c6e/nlab045f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/c97c25e5a47b/nlab045f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/6a802958bbf2/nlab045f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/610773daba49/nlab045f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/914f8fb79d53/nlab045f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/335dbe8c1d45/nlab045f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/652c8eb60c6e/nlab045f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/c97c25e5a47b/nlab045f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/6a802958bbf2/nlab045f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/8357338/610773daba49/nlab045f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Advantages of an Automated Method Compared With Manual Methods for the Quantification of Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber in Skin Biopsy.与手动方法相比,自动方法在皮肤活检中定量表皮内神经纤维的优势。
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2021 Aug 11;80(7):685-694. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlab045.
2
Significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy.在皮肤活检中评估表皮内神经纤维密度时,三位观察者之间存在显著差异。
BMC Neurol. 2009 Mar 31;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-13.
3
Automated immunohistochemistry of intra-epidermal nerve fibres in skin biopsies: A proof-of-concept study.皮肤活检中表皮内神经纤维的自动化免疫组化:概念验证研究。
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2024 Sep;29(3):329-338. doi: 10.1111/jns.12650. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
4
The reliability of skin biopsy with measurement of intraepidermal nerve fiber density.通过测量表皮内神经纤维密度进行皮肤活检的可靠性。
J Neurol Sci. 2005 Jan 15;228(1):65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2004.09.032. Epub 2004 Nov 5.
5
Uses of skin biopsy for sensory and autonomic nerve assessment.皮肤活检在感觉和自主神经评估中的应用。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013 Jan;13(1):323. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0323-2.
6
A semi-automated method to assess intraepidermal nerve fibre density in human skin biopsies.一种评估人体皮肤活检中表皮内神经纤维密度的半自动方法。
Histopathology. 2016 Apr;68(5):657-65. doi: 10.1111/his.12794. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
7
Axonal fluorescence quantitation provides a new approach to assess cutaneous innervation.轴突荧光定量为评估皮肤神经支配提供了一种新方法。
J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Sep 15;200(2):190-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.06.022. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
8
Intraepidermal nerve fibre density in POEMS (Crow-Fukase) syndrome and the correlation with sural nerve pathology.
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Jun 15;365:207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
9
Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density in Postmortem Skin: A Novel Approach.
J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2019 Dec;21(2):69-76. doi: 10.1097/CND.0000000000000264.
10
Longitudinal Assessment of Small Fiber Neuropathy: Evidence of a Non-Length-Dependent Distal Axonopathy.小纤维神经病的纵向评估:非长度依赖性远端轴索性神经病的证据。
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Jun 1;73(6):684-90. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0057.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Computer Vision Libraries to Streamline Nuclei Quantification.使用计算机视觉库简化细胞核定量分析。
J Vis Exp. 2025 Jun 6(220). doi: 10.3791/67945.
2
Morphometrical analysis of myelinated nerve fibers: is there a room for improvement?有髓神经纤维的形态计量分析:是否还有改进空间?
Anat Sci Int. 2025 Mar;100(2):191-197. doi: 10.1007/s12565-024-00801-6. Epub 2024 Sep 10.