• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向公民的实验室检验结果解读移动应用的用户体验和电子健康素养评估

A User Experience and eHealth Literacy Inspection of a Lab Test Interpretation Mobile App for Citizens.

机构信息

School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Canada.

Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:947-951. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210318.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI210318
PMID:34042813
Abstract

People are increasingly able to access their laboratory (lab) results using patient-facing portals. However, lab reports for citizens are often identical to those for clinicians; without specialized training they can be near impossible to interpret. In this study, we inspected a mobile health application (app) that converts traditional lab results into a citizen-centred format. We used the Health Literacy Online (HLO) checklist to inspect the app. Our inspection revealed that most of the app's strengths were related to its Organization of Content and Simple Navigation and most of its weaknesses were related to Engage Users. We also identified several usability and user experience (UX) issues that were beyond the purview of the HLO checklist. Although this app represents an important step towards making lab results universally accessible, we identified several opportunities for improvements that could increase its value to citizens.

摘要

人们越来越能够通过面向患者的门户访问他们的实验室(lab)结果。然而,公民的实验室报告通常与临床医生的报告相同;如果没有专门的培训,这些报告几乎不可能解读。在这项研究中,我们检查了一个将传统实验室结果转换为以公民为中心格式的移动健康应用程序(app)。我们使用了健康素养在线(HLO)检查表来检查该应用程序。我们的检查结果表明,该应用程序的大部分优势都与其内容的组织和简单导航有关,而其大部分弱点都与吸引用户有关。我们还发现了几个超出 HLO 检查表范围的可用性和用户体验(UX)问题。尽管这个应用程序代表了使实验室结果普遍可访问的重要一步,但我们确定了一些可以提高其对公民价值的改进机会。

相似文献

1
A User Experience and eHealth Literacy Inspection of a Lab Test Interpretation Mobile App for Citizens.面向公民的实验室检验结果解读移动应用的用户体验和电子健康素养评估
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:947-951. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210318.
2
A Tale of Two Inspection Methods: Comparing an eHealth Literacy and User Experience Checklist with Heuristic Evaluation.两种检查方法的比较:电子健康素养和用户体验检查表与启发式评估的比较。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:906-910. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210310.
3
Online Medication Information for Citizens: A Comparison of Demands on eHealth Literacy.公民在线用药信息:对电子健康素养需求的比较
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 16;270:1026-1030. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200317.
4
Usability and eHealth Literacy Evaluation of a Mobile Health Application Prototype to Track Diagnostic Imaging Examinations.一款用于跟踪诊断成像检查的移动健康应用程序原型的可用性和电子健康素养评估
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:150-155.
5
Designing Effective eHealth Interventions for Underserved Groups: Five Lessons From a Decade of eHealth Intervention Design and Deployment.为服务不足群体设计有效的电子健康干预措施:电子健康干预措施设计和部署十年的五个经验教训。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 7;24(1):e25419. doi: 10.2196/25419.
6
Putting Guidelines in the Hands of Patients: A Heuristic Evaluation of a Consumer Mobile Application.将指南交到患者手中:对一款消费者移动应用程序的启发式评估
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:314-318.
7
Mobile Health Usage, Preferences, Barriers, and eHealth Literacy in Rheumatology: Patient Survey Study.移动医疗的使用、偏好、障碍和风湿病患者的电子健康素养:患者调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 12;8(8):e19661. doi: 10.2196/19661.
8
Associations of Health App Use and Perceived Effectiveness in People With Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes: Population-Based Survey.心血管疾病和糖尿病患者使用健康应用程序及其感知效果的关联:基于人群的调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 28;7(3):e12179. doi: 10.2196/12179.
9
Evidence-based Heuristics for Evaluating Demands on eHealth Literacy and Usability in a Mobile Consumer Health Application.用于评估移动消费者健康应用中对电子健康素养和可用性需求的循证启发法
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:358-62.
10
A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study.移动医疗应用程序的多层次可用性评估:案例研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Oct;86:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating digital health into organizational health literacy: An updated definition, tools, and recommendations.将数字健康纳入组织健康素养:最新定义、工具及建议。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 Jul 8;38(5):8404704251356518. doi: 10.1177/08404704251356518.