Suppr超能文献

条件性疼痛调制对腰痛患者时间总和的抑制作用。

The inhibitory effect of conditioned pain modulation on temporal summation in low-back pain patients.

机构信息

Spine Center of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark.

Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Pain. 2021 May 27;21(3):606-616. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0025. Print 2021 Jul 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The literature on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is inconclusive in relation to low-back pain and it is unclear how CPM affects temporal summation as a proxy of central pain integration. The aim of this study was to examine whether the CPM effect would be different on pain induced by temporal summation than single stimuli in a group of low back pain patients.

METHODS

A total of 149 low-back pain patients were included. CPM was examined using single, repeated and temporal summation (repeated-single difference) of mechanical pressure pain as test stimuli at an individualized, fixed supra-pain-threshold force, before and after 2 min of cold pressor test (0-2 degrees Celsius). Participants were categorized as CPM responders or non-responders according to three different criteria: (any pain inhibition), (pain inhibition of more than 10VAS) and (pain inhibition or facilitation of less than 10VAS). Clinical data on back pain was collected for correlation and descriptive purposes.

RESULTS

Significant modulation was observed for all three test stimuli. Effects sizes were comparable in relative terms, but repeated pressure pain modulation was greater in absolute terms. No correlations to clinical data were observed, for any measure.

CONCLUSIONS

The current data suggests that repeated pressure pain may be better suited as the CPM test stimuli, than single pressure pain and temporal summation of pressure pain, as the CPM effect in absolute terms was greater. Employing temporal summation as the test stimulus in a CPM paradigm may be more sensitive than a single test stimulus.

摘要

目的

关于慢性疼痛调制(CPM)与下腰痛的文献尚无定论,CPM 如何影响作为中枢疼痛整合代理的时间总和尚不清楚。本研究旨在检查在一组腰痛患者中,CPM 效应是否会因时间总和引起的疼痛与单一刺激不同。

方法

共纳入 149 例腰痛患者。使用单刺激、重复刺激和机械压力疼痛的时间总和(重复-单差)作为测试刺激,在 2 分钟冷加压试验(0-2 摄氏度)前后,在个体固定超痛阈力下进行 CPM 检查。根据三个不同的标准将参与者分为 CPM 反应者和非反应者:(任何疼痛抑制)、(疼痛抑制超过 10VAS)和(疼痛抑制或促进小于 10VAS)。为了相关性和描述性目的,收集了与腰痛相关的临床数据。

结果

所有三种测试刺激均观察到显著的调制。相对而言,效应大小相当,但重复压力疼痛调制的绝对值更大。对于任何测量,都未观察到与临床数据的相关性。

结论

目前的数据表明,与单压疼痛和压痛点时间总和相比,重复压痛点可能更适合作为 CPM 测试刺激,因为 CPM 效应的绝对值更大。在 CPM 范式中,采用时间总和作为测试刺激可能比单一测试刺激更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验