Departament d'Enginyeria Química, Biològica i Ambiental, Escola d'Enginyeria, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Departament d'Enginyeria Química, Biològica i Ambiental, Escola d'Enginyeria, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 1;293:112859. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112859. Epub 2021 May 24.
Agricultural wastewater is a major source of herbicides, which pose environmental and health concerns owing to their substantial use and poor elimination rate in conventional wastewater treatment plants. White-rot fungi are versatile in degrading xenobiotics; however, the key problem encountered with their application in actual scenarios is competition with indigenous microorganisms, mainly bacteria. To address this barrier, two different strategies were implemented in the present study. One strategy was to set up a trickle bed with Trametes versicolor immobilized on pine wood, and another strategy was to employ a T. versicolor-pelleted, fluidized-bed reactor to remove diuron and bentazon from actual wastewater under non-sterile conditions. The residence time in the trickle bed was estimated using three methodologies. With 10 batches of a 3-day cycle operation, although the trickle-bed reactor possessed a shorter contact time (8.5 h per cycle) and lower laccase activity compared with those of the fluidized-bed reactor, it demonstrated a higher removal yield and lower bacterial counts. In addition, the utilization of pine wood as a carrier obviously reduced the cost since no additional nutrients were required. Hence, after evaluating all advantages and limitations of both bioreactors, for the purpose of treating over the long term and scaling up, a trickle-bed reactor is the preferred choice.
农业废水中含有大量除草剂,由于其在常规污水处理厂中的大量使用和较差的去除率,对环境和健康构成了威胁。白腐真菌在降解外来物质方面具有多功能性;然而,在实际应用中遇到的关键问题是与土著微生物(主要是细菌)竞争。为了解决这个问题,本研究采用了两种不同的策略。一种策略是在填充有松木的白腐菌固定化 trickle 床中进行,另一种策略是在非无菌条件下使用白腐菌颗粒化、流化床反应器从实际废水中去除敌草隆和苯达松。使用三种方法估计 trickle 床中的停留时间。经过 10 批 3 天的循环操作,尽管 trickle 床反应器的接触时间(每个循环 8.5 小时)和漆酶活性都比流化床反应器短,但它表现出更高的去除率和更低的细菌计数。此外,由于不需要额外的营养物质,因此使用松木作为载体明显降低了成本。因此,在评估了两种生物反应器的所有优缺点之后,为了长期处理和扩大规模, trickle 床反应器是首选。