Suppr超能文献

使用肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)抑制剂和未使用RAAS抑制剂的COVID-19感染患者的病情严重程度比较。

Comparison of Severity of COVID-19 Infection among Patients Using RAAS Inhibitors and Non-RAAS Inhibitors.

作者信息

Reddy Paidi Ramakrishna, Samavedam Srinivas, Aluru Narmada, Boggu Rajyalakshmi

机构信息

Department of Critical Care, Virinchi Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Apr;25(4):366-368. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23774.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the article was to study the safety profile of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor in COVID-19-affected Indian patients.

INTRODUCTION

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for COVID-19 infection. There has been uncertainty about use of RAAS inhibitors in COVID-19. The association of RAAS inhibitors with severity of infection and clinical outcomes was addressed in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study from Indian intensive care unit (ICU). A total of 138 were included, who were divided into group A (RAAS inhibitor) and group B (non-RAAS inhibitor). They are followed up till ICU stay during which peak levels of ferritin, D dimer, interleukin-6 were noted (primary outcome). The number of ventilator days, ICU length of stay, and ICU outcome also compared.

RESULTS

Of 138 patients, 18 are included in group A and 120, in group B. There is no difference in peak levels (mean) D dimer [5,893 vs 7,710, 0.46], ferritin [2,388 vs 3,635, 0.56], interleukin-6 [9,597 vs 3,625, 0.06]. There is no difference in number of ventilator days (2.2 vs 1.78, 0.53) and ICU length of stay (6.5 vs 6.1, 0.74).

CONCLUSION

RAAS inhibitors can be safely continued in COVID-19 infection. It is not associated with an increase in severity of infection, ICU length of stay, and mortality.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Reddy PR, Samavedam S, Aluru N, Rajyalakshmi B. Comparison of Severity of COVID-19 Infection among Patients Using RAAS Inhibitors and Non-RAAS Inhibitors. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(4):366-368.

摘要

目的与目标

本文旨在研究肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统(RAAS)抑制剂在感染新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID - 19)的印度患者中的安全性。

引言

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)是导致COVID-19感染的病原体。在COVID-19患者中使用RAAS抑制剂一直存在不确定性。本研究探讨了RAAS抑制剂与感染严重程度及临床结局之间的关联。

材料与方法

这是一项来自印度重症监护病房(ICU)的单中心回顾性研究。共纳入138例患者,分为A组(使用RAAS抑制剂)和B组(未使用RAAS抑制剂)。对患者进行随访直至其在ICU住院期间,记录铁蛋白、D-二聚体、白细胞介素-6的峰值水平(主要结局)。同时比较两组患者的机械通气天数、ICU住院时长及ICU结局。

结果

138例患者中,A组18例,B组120例。两组患者D-二聚体峰值水平(均值)[5,893 vs 7,710,P = 0.46]、铁蛋白[2,388 vs 3,635,P = 0.56]、白细胞介素-6[9,597 vs 3,625,P = 0.06]无差异。机械通气天数(2.2 vs 1.78,P = 0.53)和ICU住院时长(6.5 vs 6.1,P = 0.74)也无差异。

结论

在COVID-19感染患者中可安全继续使用RAAS抑制剂。它与感染严重程度增加、ICU住院时长及死亡率升高无关。

如何引用本文

Reddy PR, Samavedam S, Aluru N, Rajyalakshmi B. Comparison of Severity of COVID-19 Infection among Patients Using RAAS Inhibitors and Non-RAAS Inhibitors. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(4):366-368.

相似文献

1
Comparison of Severity of COVID-19 Infection among Patients Using RAAS Inhibitors and Non-RAAS Inhibitors.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Apr;25(4):366-368. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23774.
3
Prognostic Value of "Cycle Threshold" in Confirmed COVID-19 Patients.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar;25(3):322-326. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23765.
4
Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers and region-specific variations in COVID-19 outcomes: findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2021 May 14;12:20420986211011345. doi: 10.1177/20420986211011345. eCollection 2021.
5
Association Between Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and COVID-19 Infection in South Korea.
Hypertension. 2020 Sep;76(3):742-749. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15464. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Effect of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockers on Adverse Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients.
Cardiology. 2024;149(6):551-560. doi: 10.1159/000540499. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
8
The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System and Coronavirus Disease 2019.
Eur Cardiol. 2021 Mar 9;16:e07. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2020.30. eCollection 2021 Feb.
9
Renin-Angiotensin Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Primary Prevention and COVID-19.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e021154. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.021154. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

2
A Shot in the Dark! RAAS Inhibitors Cause Severe COVID-19 Infection.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Apr;25(4):353-354. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23796.

本文引用的文献

1
Initial Experience of Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Western India: A Case Series.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul;24(7):509-513. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23477.
3
Risk of severe COVID-19 disease with ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: cohort study including 8.3 million people.
Heart. 2020 Oct;106(19):1503-1511. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317393. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
5
Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 Infection Taking ACEI/ARB.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Apr 14;22(5):31. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01291-4.
8
The COVID-19 epidemic.
Trop Med Int Health. 2020 Mar;25(3):278-280. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13383. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
9
Trilogy of ACE2: a peptidase in the renin-angiotensin system, a SARS receptor, and a partner for amino acid transporters.
Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Oct;128(1):119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
10
A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury.
Nat Med. 2005 Aug;11(8):875-9. doi: 10.1038/nm1267. Epub 2005 Jul 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验