• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估再灌注的程度和速度:首次通过心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TICI)2c-3级是首选的血管内再灌注终点。

Benchmarking the Extent and Speed of Reperfusion: First Pass TICI 2c-3 Is a Preferred Endovascular Reperfusion Endpoint.

作者信息

Yoo Albert J, Soomro Jazba, Andersson Tommy, Saver Jeffrey L, Ribo Marc, Bozorgchami Hormozd, Dabus Guilherme, Liebeskind David S, Jadhav Ashutosh, Mattle Heinrich, Zaidat Osama O

机构信息

Department of Neurointervention, Texas Stroke Institute, Fort Worth, TX, United States.

Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 May 11;12:669934. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.669934. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2021.669934
PMID:34046008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8144635/
Abstract

End-of-procedure substantial reperfusion [modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) 2b-3], the leading endpoint for thrombectomy studies, has several limitations including a ceiling effect, with recent achieved rates of ~90%. We aimed to identify a more optimal definition of angiographic success along two dimensions: (1) the extent of tissue reperfusion, and (2) the speed of revascularization. Core-lab adjudicated TICI scores for the first three passes of EmboTrap and the final all-procedures result were analyzed in the ARISE II multicenter study. The clinical impact of extent of reperfusion and speed of reperfusion (first-pass vs. later-pass) were evaluated. Clinical outcomes included 90-day functional independence [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2], 90-day freedom-from-disability (mRS 0-1), and dramatic early improvement [24-h National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) improvement ≥ 8 points]. Among 161 ARISE II subjects with ICA or MCA M1 occlusions, reperfusion results at procedure end showed substantial reperfusion in 149 (92.5%), excellent reperfusion in 121 (75.2%), and complete reperfusion in 79 (49.1%). Reperfusion rates on first pass were substantial in 81 (50.3%), excellent reperfusion in 62 (38.5%), and complete reperfusion in 44 (27.3%). First-pass excellent reperfusion (first-pass TICI 2c-3) had the greatest nominal predictive value for 90-day mRS 0-2 (sensitivity 58.5%, specificity 68.6%). There was a progressive worsening of outcomes with each additional pass required to achieve TICI 2c-3. First-pass excellent reperfusion (TICI 2c-3), reflecting rapid achievement of extensive reperfusion, is the technical revascularization endpoint that best predicted functional independence in this international multicenter trial and is an attractive candidate for a lead angiographic endpoint for future trials. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02488915.

摘要

手术结束时的实质性再灌注[改良脑缺血治疗(mTICI)2b - 3级]是取栓研究的主要终点,但存在包括天花板效应在内的若干局限性,近期达到的比率约为90%。我们旨在从两个维度确定血管造影成功的更优定义:(1)组织再灌注的程度,以及(2)血管再通的速度。在ARISE II多中心研究中,分析了核心实验室判定的EmboTrap前三次通过时的TICI评分以及最终所有手术的结果。评估了再灌注程度和再灌注速度(首次通过与后续通过)的临床影响。临床结局包括90天功能独立[改良Rankin量表(mRS)0 - 2级]、90天无残疾(mRS 0 - 1级)以及显著早期改善[24小时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)改善≥8分]。在161例患有颈内动脉或大脑中动脉M1段闭塞的ARISE II受试者中,手术结束时的再灌注结果显示,149例(92.5%)为实质性再灌注,121例(75.2%)为良好再灌注,79例(49.1%)为完全再灌注。首次通过时的再灌注率为:实质性再灌注81例(50.3%),良好再灌注62例(38.5%),完全再灌注44例(27.3%)。首次通过时的良好再灌注(首次通过TICI 2c - 3级)对90天mRS 0 - 2级具有最大的名义预测价值(敏感性58.5%,特异性68.6%)。为达到TICI 2c - 3级所需的每增加一次通过,结局都会逐渐恶化。首次通过时的良好再灌注(TICI 2c - 3级)反映了广泛再灌注的快速实现,是该国际多中心试验中最能预测功能独立的技术血管再通终点,也是未来试验主要血管造影终点的一个有吸引力的候选指标。http://www.clinicaltrials.gov,标识符NCT02488915。

相似文献

1
Benchmarking the Extent and Speed of Reperfusion: First Pass TICI 2c-3 Is a Preferred Endovascular Reperfusion Endpoint.评估再灌注的程度和速度:首次通过心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TICI)2c-3级是首选的血管内再灌注终点。
Front Neurol. 2021 May 11;12:669934. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.669934. eCollection 2021.
2
Primary Results of the Multicenter ARISE II Study (Analysis of Revascularization in Ischemic Stroke With EmboTrap).多中心 ARISE II 研究(缺血性卒中血管内取栓治疗中 EmboTrap 应用的分析)的主要结果。
Stroke. 2018 May;49(5):1107-1115. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020125. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
3
First-Pass Reperfusion by Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute M1 Occlusion: The Size of Retriever Matters.急性M1闭塞时机械取栓的首次通过再灌注:取栓装置的尺寸很重要。
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 22;12:679402. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.679402. eCollection 2021.
4
Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2C/Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 3 Reperfusion Should Be the Aim of Mechanical Thrombectomy: Insights From the ASTER Trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization).改良溶栓治疗脑梗死 2C/脑梗死 3 再灌注应是机械取栓的目标:来自 ASTER 试验(接触抽吸与支架取栓治疗成功再通的比较)的见解。
Stroke. 2018 May;49(5):1189-1196. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020700. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
Rethinking Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b: Which Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Scales Best Define Near Complete Recanalization in the Modern Thrombectomy Era?脑梗死溶栓治疗再思考2b:在现代血栓切除术时代,哪种脑梗死溶栓量表最能准确界定近乎完全再通?
Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2488-2493. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017182. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
6
Cyclical aspiration using a novel mechanical thrombectomy device is associated with a high TICI 3 first pass effect in large-vessel strokes.采用新型机械取栓装置进行周期性抽吸与大血管闭塞性卒中患者首次通过 TICI 3 级效果显著相关。
J Neuroimaging. 2021 Sep;31(5):912-924. doi: 10.1111/jon.12889. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
7
Mechanical Thrombectomy with the Novel NeVa M1 Stent Retriever: Do the Drop Zones Represent a Risk or a Benefit?新型 NeVa M1 支架取栓器机械血栓切除术:“滴区”代表风险还是获益?
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e121-e129. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.075. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
8
Is Reperfusion Useful in Ischaemic Stroke Patients Presenting with a Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and a Proximal Large Vessel Occlusion of the Anterior Circulation?对于美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分较低且存在前循环近端大血管闭塞的缺血性卒中患者,再灌注治疗是否有效?
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;43(5-6):305-312. doi: 10.1159/000468995. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
9
Mechanical thrombectomy with a novel stent retriever with multifunctional zones: Initial clinical experience with the NeVa™ thrombectomy device.新型多功区支架取栓器机械血栓切除术:NeVa™血栓切除装置的初步临床经验。
J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;47(4):301-305. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
10
A direct aspiration first-pass technique vs stentriever thrombectomy in emergent large vessel intracranial occlusions.直接抽吸首过技术与支架取栓术治疗急性大血管颅内闭塞。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):567-574. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161563. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Key to better outcomes in stroke intervention: early versus complete reperfusion in first pass recanalization.卒中干预取得更好疗效的关键:首次再通中的早期与完全再灌注
J Neurol. 2025 Jul 11;272(8):504. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13235-5.
2
Is first-pass effect a meaningful metric to evaluate thrombectomy technologies?首过效应是评估血栓切除术技术的一个有意义的指标吗?
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 27:15910199251351167. doi: 10.1177/15910199251351167.
3
Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Following Cardiac Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
There Is No Association Between the Number of Stent Retriever Passes and the Incidence of Hemorrhagic Transformation for Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy.接受机械取栓治疗的患者,支架取栓次数与出血转化发生率之间无关联。
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 8;10:818. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00818. eCollection 2019.
2
True First-Pass Effect.真正的首次通过效应。
Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2140-2146. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025148. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
3
When to Stop.何时停止。
心脏介入术后急性缺血性卒中的机械取栓治疗结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Jan;48(1):45-58. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03890-y. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
4
Can ischemic stroke patients with mTICI of 2b achieve similar outcomes compared to those with complete recanalization following endovascular therapy?血管内治疗后,改良脑梗死溶栓分级(mTICI)为2b级的缺血性中风患者与实现完全再通的患者相比,能否获得相似的预后?
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 30;15:1486586. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1486586. eCollection 2024.
5
Stent retriever versus aspiration based thrombectomy: impact on first pass reperfusion, procedure time, and clinical outcomes in large vessel occlusion. Nationwide registry based cohort study.支架取栓器与抽吸式血栓切除术:对大血管闭塞患者首次通过再灌注、手术时间及临床结局的影响。基于全国登记的队列研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Jun 1;17(e2):e245-e251. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-021793.
6
Three years' interventional neurology experience in Turkey with the Thrombite thrombectomy device in large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation: safety, efficacy, and clinical outcome.在土耳其使用Thrombite血栓切除术装置治疗前循环大血管闭塞的三年介入神经学经验:安全性、有效性和临床结果。
Front Neurol. 2024 May 3;15:1320510. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1320510. eCollection 2024.
7
Excellent Recanalization and Small Core Volumes Are Associated With Favorable AM-PAC Score in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Secondary to Large Vessel Occlusion.在大血管闭塞继发急性缺血性卒中患者中,良好的再通和较小的梗死核心体积与良好的AM-PAC评分相关。
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2023 Oct 26;5(4):100306. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100306. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Primary results from the CLEAR study of a novel stent retriever with drop zone technology.CLEAR 研究中新型支架取栓器与降段技术的主要结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Nov 22;16(12):1220-1227. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020960.
9
VacLok-Augmented Direct Aspiration Thrombectomy : A Novel Method of an Aspiration First-pass Approach for Acute Ischemic Stroke.VacLok增强直接抽吸血栓切除术:一种急性缺血性卒中抽吸首次通过法的新方法。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;34(2):499-502. doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01354-3. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
10
Predictors of mTICI 2c/3 over 2b in patients successfully recanalized with mechanical thrombectomy.机械取栓成功再通患者 mTICI 2c/3 优于 2b 的预测因素。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Jan;11(1):89-95. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51935. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
Stroke. 2019 Jul;50(7):1781-1788. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025088. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
4
Impact of Procedure Time on Outcomes of Thrombectomy for Stroke.影响手术时间对中风取栓治疗结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 5;73(8):879-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.052.
5
Impact of Balloon Guide Catheter Use on Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes in the STRATIS Stroke Thrombectomy Registry.在 STRATIS 卒中取栓登记研究中,球囊导引导管使用对临床和血管造影结局的影响。
Stroke. 2019 Mar;50(3):697-704. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021126.
6
More than three passes of stent retriever is an independent predictor of parenchymal hematoma in acute ischemic stroke.支架取栓超过 3 次是急性缺血性脑卒中患者发生实质血肿的独立预测因子。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jul;11(7):625-629. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014380. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
7
Recanalization Rate per Retrieval Attempt in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的每取栓尝试再通率。
Stroke. 2018 Oct;49(10):2523-2525. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022737.
8
eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy.血管内卒中治疗中的再灌注:定义成功。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 May;11(5):433-438. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014127. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
9
Primary Results of the Multicenter ARISE II Study (Analysis of Revascularization in Ischemic Stroke With EmboTrap).多中心 ARISE II 研究(缺血性卒中血管内取栓治疗中 EmboTrap 应用的分析)的主要结果。
Stroke. 2018 May;49(5):1107-1115. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020125. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
10
Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2C/Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 3 Reperfusion Should Be the Aim of Mechanical Thrombectomy: Insights From the ASTER Trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization).改良溶栓治疗脑梗死 2C/脑梗死 3 再灌注应是机械取栓的目标:来自 ASTER 试验(接触抽吸与支架取栓治疗成功再通的比较)的见解。
Stroke. 2018 May;49(5):1189-1196. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020700. Epub 2018 Apr 6.