Pediatric Neurology and Neurodevelopment Unit, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh.
Pediatric Neurology and Neurodevelopment Unit, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh. Correspondence to: Prof Pratibha Singhi, Director, Department of Pediatrics Neurology and Neurodevelopment, Medanta, The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana.
Indian Pediatr. 2021 Sep 15;58(9):826-832. Epub 2021 May 28.
: Institutional physiotherapy as a standard of care for management of cerebral palsy (CP) has certain shortcomings, especially in resource-constrained settings. This is a proof-of-concept trial to evaluate the efficacy of individualized home-centered activity-based therapy in children with spastic diplegic CP.
Randomized controlled trial (open-label).
Tertiary-care hospital with pediatric neurology services (July, 2014 to July, 2016).
Consecutive sample of 59 children (5-12 y) with spastic diplegic CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System scores II-III) without fixed lower-limb contractures, illnesses impeding physiotherapy or history of recent botulinum toxin injection/surgery were recruited.
Children were randomized to Intervention or Control arms. Their 6-minute-walk Test (6MWT) scoring and clinical examination were performed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Children in Intervention arm (n=30) were prescribed parent-supervised home-centered activity-based therapy (walking, standing, squatting, climbing upstairs/downstairs, kicking a ball, dancing, riding a tricycle/bicycle) in addition to their institutional physiotherapy. Children in Control arm (n=29) were prescribed ongoing institutional physiotherapy alone. Logbooks, home videos and telephonic follow-ups were used to ensure compliance.
Comparison of the mean change in 6MWT scores at 6 months (from baseline) between the two groups.
Median (IQR) change in 6MWT scores at 6 months (from baseline) in the Intervention and Control arms were 3.5 (-5.3, 9) m and 3 (-7.8, 6.3) m.
Adjunct home-centered activity-based therapy was safe and feasible, but did not result in appreciable gains over 6 months.
机构物理疗法作为脑瘫(CP)管理的标准护理方法存在一定的局限性,特别是在资源有限的环境中。这是一项概念验证试验,旨在评估个体化家庭为中心的基于活动的治疗在痉挛性双瘫 CP 儿童中的疗效。
随机对照试验(开放性标签)。
具有儿科神经病学服务的三级保健医院(2014 年 7 月至 2016 年 7 月)。
连续入选了 59 名痉挛性双瘫 CP(Gross Motor Function Classification System 评分 II-III)、无固定下肢挛缩、妨碍物理治疗的疾病或近期肉毒毒素注射/手术史的儿童(5-12 岁)。
将儿童随机分配到干预组或对照组。在基线、3 个月和 6 个月时对他们进行 6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)评分和临床检查。干预组(n=30)的儿童在接受机构物理治疗的基础上,接受父母监督的家庭为中心的基于活动的治疗(行走、站立、下蹲、上下楼梯、踢球、跳舞、骑三轮车/自行车)。对照组(n=29)的儿童仅接受机构物理治疗。使用日志、家庭视频和电话随访来确保依从性。
比较两组儿童 6 个月(从基线)时 6MWT 评分的平均变化。
干预组和对照组儿童 6 个月(从基线)时 6MWT 评分的中位数(IQR)变化分别为 3.5(-5.3,9)m 和 3(-7.8,6.3)m。
家庭为中心的基于活动的辅助治疗是安全可行的,但在 6 个月内没有显著获益。