Suppr超能文献

一种保留涎管解剖结构的涎石病治疗新方法。

A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Sialolithiasis that Preserves Salivary Duct Anatomy.

机构信息

Şengör ENT Center, Private Clinic, Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.

Medical Faculty Department of Otolaryngology, Cyprus International University, Nicosia, Cyprus.

出版信息

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2022 Mar;131(3):268-276. doi: 10.1177/00034894211018926. Epub 2021 May 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The sialendoscopy era in the treatment of salivary gland stones has reduced the use of classical surgical methods. However, the miniature ducts and tools may cause difficulties in removing large sialoliths. Therefore, invasive combined oral surgeries or gland resection may be considered. We searched for the most suitable method in order to stay in line with the minimally invasive approach that preserves the ductus anatomy, and that can reduce the surgical fears of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 84 cases (23 parotid and 61 submandibular) in whom stones were fragmented by pneumatic lithotripsy and removed between January 2015 and January 2020. The parotid cases comprised 7 females and 16 males, and the submandibular cases comprised 25 females and 36 males. Intraductal lithotripsy was performed using pneumatic lithotripter. This study has fourth level of evidence.

RESULTS

Based on total number of cases (n = 84), success rate was 67/84 (79.7%) immediately after sialendoscopy, and overall success rate was 77/84 (91.6%). Based on number of stones treated (n = 111), our immediate success rate was 94/111 (84.6%), and overall success rate was 104/111 (93.7%). The success criteria were complete removal of the stone and fragments in a single sialendoscopy procedure and resolution of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully treated salivary gland stones, including L3b stones, in our patient cohort with sialendoscopy combined with pneumatic lithotripsy. The lithotripsy method that we have adapted seems to be more useful and cost-effective compared to its alternatives. We were also able to preserve the ductus anatomy and relieve patients' concerns. Level IV.

摘要

目的

唾液腺结石治疗的涎腺镜时代减少了对经典手术方法的使用。然而,微小的导管和工具可能会在取出大的涎石时造成困难。因此,可能需要考虑侵入性联合口腔手术或腺体切除术。我们寻找最合适的方法,以符合保留导管解剖结构的微创方法,并减少患者对手术的恐惧。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间接受气压弹道碎石术碎石和取出结石的 84 例(23 例腮腺和 61 例下颌下腺)患者。腮腺病例包括 7 名女性和 16 名男性,下颌下腺病例包括 25 名女性和 36 名男性。使用气压弹道碎石机进行导管内碎石。本研究的证据等级为四级。

结果

根据总病例数(n=84),涎腺镜检查后即刻成功率为 67/84(79.7%),总体成功率为 77/84(91.6%)。根据治疗的结石数(n=111),我们的即刻成功率为 94/111(84.6%),总体成功率为 104/111(93.7%)。成功标准是在单次涎腺镜检查过程中完全清除结石和碎片,并缓解症状。

结论

我们成功地治疗了包括 L3b 结石在内的唾液腺结石,采用涎腺镜联合气压弹道碎石术治疗。与其他方法相比,我们适应的碎石方法似乎更有用且更具成本效益。我们还能够保留导管解剖结构并缓解患者的担忧。证据等级 IV。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验