Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Geraardsbergen, Belgium.
Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sci Rep. 2021 May 28;11(1):11282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90771-w.
The invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) imperils freshwater biodiversity worldwide. Effective management hinges on early detection of incipient invasions and subsequent rapid response, as established populations are extremely difficult to eradicate. Although environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods provide a highly sensitive alternative to conventional surveillance techniques, extensive testing is imperative to generate reliable output. Here, we tested and compared the performance of two primer/probe assays to detect and quantify the abundance of bullfrogs in Western Europe in silico and in situ using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Although both assays proved to be equally target-specific and sensitive, one outperformed the other in ddPCR detection resolution (i.e., distinguishing groups of target-positive and target-negative droplets), and hence was selected for further analyses. Mesocosm experiments revealed that tadpole abundance and biomass explained 99% of the variation in eDNA concentration. Because per individual eDNA emission rates did not differ significantly among tadpoles and juveniles, and adults mostly reside out of the water, eDNA concentration can be used as an approximation of local bullfrog abundance in natural populations. Seasonal eDNA patterns in three colonized ponds showed parallel fluctuations in bullfrog eDNA concentration. An increase in eDNA concentration was detected in spring, followed by a strong peak coinciding with the breeding season (August, September or October), and continuously low eDNA concentrations during winter. With this study, we report the validation process required for appropriately implementing eDNA barcoding analyses in lentic systems. We demonstrate that this technique can serve as a solid and reliable tool to detect the early stages of bullfrog invasions and to quantify temporal changes in abundance that will be useful in coordinating large-scale bullfrog eradication programs and evaluating their efficiency.
入侵的美洲牛蛙(Lithobates catesbeianus)对全球淡水生物多样性构成威胁。有效的管理取决于对初期入侵的早期检测和随后的快速响应,因为已建立的种群极难根除。尽管环境 DNA(eDNA)检测方法为传统监测技术提供了一种高度敏感的替代方法,但广泛的测试是必不可少的,以产生可靠的结果。在这里,我们测试并比较了两种引物/探针检测方法的性能,以在西欧进行计算机模拟和现场检测和定量牛蛙的丰度,使用数字液滴 PCR(ddPCR)。尽管两种检测方法都被证明具有同等的特异性和敏感性,但一种方法在 ddPCR 检测分辨率方面表现优于另一种(即区分靶阳性和靶阴性液滴组),因此被选为进一步分析。中观实验表明,蝌蚪丰度和生物量解释了 eDNA 浓度变化的 99%。由于个体的 eDNA 排放率在蝌蚪和幼体之间没有显著差异,而成年个体主要生活在水中之外,因此 eDNA 浓度可作为自然种群中本地牛蛙丰度的近似值。三个被殖民池塘的季节性 eDNA 模式显示出牛蛙 eDNA 浓度的平行波动。春季 eDNA 浓度增加,随后与繁殖季节(8 月、9 月或 10 月)相一致的强烈峰值,冬季持续低 eDNA 浓度。通过这项研究,我们报告了在静水系统中适当实施 eDNA 条形码分析所需的验证过程。我们证明,该技术可以作为一种可靠的工具,用于检测牛蛙入侵的早期阶段,并量化丰度的时间变化,这将有助于协调大规模的牛蛙根除计划,并评估其效率。