• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Survival Outcomes Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Review of 47,000 Patients.转移性乳腺癌患者的生存结局:4.7 万名患者的回顾性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7441-7449. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10227-3. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
Clinical Outcomes, Treatment Patterns, and Health Resource Utilization Among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation: A Real-World Retrospective Study.遗传性 BRCA1/2 突变的转移性乳腺癌患者的临床结局、治疗模式和卫生资源利用:一项真实世界回顾性研究。
Adv Ther. 2019 Mar;36(3):708-720. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0867-x. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
3
Time trends of overall survival among metastatic breast cancer patients in the real-life ESME cohort.真实世界 ESME 队列中转移性乳腺癌患者总体生存的时间趋势。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Jun;96:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
4
Clinical outcomes and metastatic behavior between de novo versus recurrent HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A 17-year single-institution cohort study at Taipei Veterans General Hospital.HER2阳性原发性与复发性转移性乳腺癌的临床结局和转移行为:台北荣民总医院一项为期17年的单机构队列研究。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;85(1):88-94. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000622.
5
Risk and prognostic factors of breast cancer with liver metastases.乳腺癌肝转移的风险和预后因素。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07968-5.
6
De Novo Versus Recurrent HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Patient Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival from the SystHERs Registry.从 SystHERs 注册研究看新发性与复发性 HER2 阳性转移性乳腺癌:患者特征、治疗和生存。
Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):e214-e222. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0446. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
7
Contemporary outcomes of metastatic breast cancer among 22,000 women from the multicentre ESME cohort 2008-2016.2008-2016 年多中心 ESME 队列 22000 名女性转移性乳腺癌的当代结局。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Apr;129:60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
8
Epidemiological characteristics, clinical outcomes and management patterns of metastatic breast cancer patients in routine clinical care settings of Greece: Results from the EMERGE multicenter retrospective chart review study.希腊常规临床环境中转移性乳腺癌患者的流行病学特征、临床结局和治疗模式:来自 EMERGE 多中心回顾性图表审查研究的结果。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5301-5.
9
Evolution of overall survival and receipt of new therapies by subtype among 20 446 metastatic breast cancer patients in the 2008-2017 ESME cohort.2008-2017 年 ESME 队列中 20446 例转移性乳腺癌患者的总体生存和新疗法接受情况的亚型演变。
ESMO Open. 2021 Jun;6(3):100114. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100114. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
10
Real-world clinical outcomes of patients with BRCA-mutated, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer: a CancerLinQ® study.BRCA 突变、人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阴性转移性乳腺癌患者的真实世界临床结局:一项 CancerLinQ®研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 May;193(1):83-94. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06541-3. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated With Employment and Quality of Working Life in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer.转移性乳腺癌患者就业及工作生活质量的相关因素
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71074. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71074.
2
Clinical Outcomes of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy in HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Comparison of HER2-Low and HER2-Zero Subgroups.CDK4/6抑制剂治疗HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌的临床结局:HER2低表达和HER2零表达亚组的多中心比较
Breast J. 2025 Jun 27;2025:5577345. doi: 10.1155/tbj/5577345. eCollection 2025.
3
A Pragmatic Grouping Model for Bone-Only De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer (MetS Protocol MF22-03).一种针对仅骨转移的新发转移性乳腺癌的实用分组模型(MetS方案MF22-03)。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 18;17(12):2033. doi: 10.3390/cancers17122033.
4
Comparison of survival outcomes for patients with Stage III vs de novo Stage IV breast cancer.III期与初发性IV期乳腺癌患者生存结局的比较。
Cancer. 2025 May 15;131(10):e35891. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35891.
5
Peptide-Modified Lipid Nanoparticles Boost the Antitumor Efficacy of RNA Therapeutics.肽修饰的脂质纳米颗粒增强RNA疗法的抗肿瘤疗效。
ACS Nano. 2025 Apr 15;19(14):13685-13704. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c14625. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
6
MRPL24 drives breast cancer metastasis and stemness by targeting c-MYC, BRD4, and STAT3.MRPL24通过靶向c-MYC、BRD4和STAT3驱动乳腺癌转移和干性。
3 Biotech. 2025 Feb;15(2):37. doi: 10.1007/s13205-024-04196-z. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
7
Predictive markers of rapid disease progression and chemotherapy resistance in triple-negative breast cancer patients following postoperative adjuvant therapy.三阴性乳腺癌患者术后辅助治疗后疾病快速进展和化疗耐药的预测标志物。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84785-3.
8
Predictive Modeling of Long-Term Survivors with Stage IV Breast Cancer Using the SEER-Medicare Dataset.利用监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据集对IV期乳腺癌长期幸存者进行预测建模。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 1;16(23):4033. doi: 10.3390/cancers16234033.
9
Racial disparities in the frequency and timing of code status orders among women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性患者的医嘱频度和时机存在种族差异。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):1426. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13132-6.
10
Effects of BYL-719 (alpelisib) on human breast cancer stem cells to overcome drug resistance in human breast cancer.BYL-719(阿培利司)对人乳腺癌干细胞克服人乳腺癌耐药性的影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 14;15:1443422. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1443422. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A Novel Staging System for De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer Refines Prognostic Estimates.一种新的转移性乳腺癌分期系统可改善预后评估。
Ann Surg. 2022 Apr 1;275(4):784-792. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004231.

转移性乳腺癌患者的生存结局:4.7 万名患者的回顾性研究。

Survival Outcomes Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Review of 47,000 Patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7441-7449. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10227-3. Epub 2021 May 28.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-10227-3
PMID:34050430
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8530869/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains incurable, advances in therapies have improved survival. Using a contemporary dataset of de novo MBC patients, we explore how overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) changed over time.

METHODS

All patients with de novo MBC from 1988 to 2016 were selected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18. Unadjusted OS and CSS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and stratified by disease characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models determined factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

47,034 patients were included, with median OS of 25 months and CSS of 27 months. Survival steadily improved over time (1988: 1-year OS 62%, CSS 65%; 2015: 1-year OS 72%, CSS 74%). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) had the worst prognosis and were most likely to die from MBC [versus human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ and hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2-]. Those with ≥ 4 sites of metastatic disease were also more likely to die from MBC with nearly identical OS and CSS (5-year OS 9%, CSS 9%), when compared with those with 1 site (5-year OS 31%, CSS 35%). After adjustment, improved CSS was associated with bone-only disease [hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-0.94], while TNBC (versus HER2+: HR 3.12, 95% CI 2.89-3.36) and > 3 sites of metastatic disease (versus 1 site: HR 3.24, 95% CI 2.68-3.91) were associated with worse CSS (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate prognostic estimates are essential for patient care. As treatments for patients with MBC have expanded, OS and CSS have improved, and more patients, particularly with limited distant disease or favorable tumor subtypes, are also dying from non-MBC causes.

摘要

背景

尽管转移性乳腺癌(MBC)仍然无法治愈,但治疗方法的进步提高了生存率。我们使用当代初诊 MBC 患者数据集,探讨总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)随时间的变化。

方法

从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)18 中选择所有初诊 MBC 患者。Kaplan-Meier 法估计未经调整的 OS 和 CSS,并按疾病特征分层。Cox 比例风险模型确定与生存相关的因素。

结果

共纳入 47034 例患者,中位 OS 为 25 个月,CSS 为 27 个月。生存随时间稳步改善(1988 年:1 年 OS 为 62%,CSS 为 65%;2015 年:1 年 OS 为 72%,CSS 为 74%)。三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者预后最差,最有可能死于 MBC[与人类表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)+和激素受体(HR)+/HER2-相比]。转移性疾病≥4 部位的患者也更有可能死于 MBC,其 OS 和 CSS 几乎相同(5 年 OS 为 9%,CSS 为 9%),而 1 部位患者的 5 年 OS 为 31%,CSS 为 35%)。调整后,CSS 改善与仅骨疾病相关[风险比(HR)0.88,95%置信区间(CI)0.83-0.94],而 TNBC(与 HER2+相比:HR 3.12,95%CI 2.89-3.36)和>3 个转移部位(与 1 个部位相比:HR 3.24,95%CI 2.68-3.91)与 CSS 较差相关(均 p<0.001)。

结论

准确的预后估计对患者护理至关重要。随着 MBC 患者治疗的扩展,OS 和 CSS 得到了改善,更多的患者,特别是远处疾病有限或肿瘤亚型有利的患者,也死于非 MBC 原因。