Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 4.
Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice in children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with soft tissue neck swelling. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has good accuracy when compared to comprehensive radiology department ultrasound (RADUS). POCUS could potentially improve ED length of stay (LOS) by improving efficiency. We aimed to evaluate the LOS of pediatric patients seen in ED with soft tissue neck swelling who received POCUS compared to RADUS. We determined unscheduled 30-day return visit rates in both groups as a balancing measure.
We performed a retrospective review of the electronic medical record for our cross-sectional study of discharged patients ≤21 years of age who had a neck ultrasound performed by a credentialed POCUS physician or by the radiology department between July 2014 and January 2020. We included patients who had both POCUS and RADUS in the POCUS group. We compared median ED LOS in both groups using the Mann Whitney U test and proportion of unscheduled return visits to the ED in both groups using odds ratio and 95% CI.
There were 925 patients: 76 with only POCUS, 6 with POCUS and RADUS, and 843 with only RADUS performed. Median LOS in the POCUS group was 68.5 min (IQR 38.3120.3) versus 154.0 min (IQR 111.0, 211.0) in the RADUS group (p < 0.001). Return visit overall was 7.6%: 13.2% in the POCUS group versus 7.1% in the RADUS group (p = 0.07).
Pediatric patients evaluated in the ED for soft tissue neck swelling had a shorter LOS with POCUS than with RADUS without a statistically significant increase in 30-day return visits. We suggest a "POCUS First" approach to the care of these patients.
在因软组织颈部肿胀而到急诊科就诊的儿童中,超声是首选的影像学检查方法。床边超声(POCUS)与综合放射科超声(RADUS)相比具有较高的准确性。POCUS 可以通过提高效率来潜在地缩短急诊科的停留时间(LOS)。我们旨在评估与 RADUS 相比,在急诊科接受软组织颈部肿胀 POCUS 检查的儿科患者的 LOS。我们确定了两组中未计划的 30 天复诊率作为平衡措施。
我们对 2014 年 7 月至 2020 年 1 月期间接受经过认证的 POCUS 医师或放射科进行颈部超声检查的≤21 岁出院患者的电子病历进行了回顾性研究。我们将同时进行 POCUS 和 RADUS 的患者纳入 POCUS 组。我们使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较了两组患者的 ED LOS 中位数,并使用比值比和 95%CI 比较了两组患者的未计划 ED 复诊比例。
共有 925 名患者:76 名仅接受 POCUS,6 名接受 POCUS 和 RADUS,843 名仅接受 RADUS。POCUS 组的 LOS 中位数为 68.5 分钟(IQR 38.3120.3),RADUS 组为 154.0 分钟(IQR 111.0,211.0)(p<0.001)。总的复诊率为 7.6%:POCUS 组为 13.2%,RADUS 组为 7.1%(p=0.07)。
在急诊科评估软组织颈部肿胀的儿科患者,POCUS 检查的 LOS 比 RADUS 短,而 30 天复诊率没有统计学意义上的增加。我们建议对这些患者采用“POCUS 优先”的方法进行治疗。