Lin Margaret J, Neuman Mark, Rempell Rachel, Monuteaux Michael, Levy Jason
Department of Emergency Medicine & Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;54(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly being used to differentiate cellulitis from abscess in the pediatric emergency department (ED). POCUS has also been shown to decrease length of stay (LOS) for other applications among adult patients.
We sought to determine if ED LOS differed for children presenting with skin and soft tissue infections who received POCUS versus radiology-performed ultrasound.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of children presenting to an urban pediatric ED between January 2011 and June 2013 with a diagnosis of cellulitis or abscess who underwent soft tissue ultrasound. Patients who received a surgical consult, had significant medical comorbidities, or had a lesion located on the face, hands, feet, or groin were excluded. We compared ED LOS among children who received radiology-performed ultrasound to children who received POCUS, adjusting for relevant clinical variables.
Among 3094 children with a diagnosis of cellulitis or abscess, we identified 202 who underwent a POCUS and 118 who underwent radiology-performed ultrasound. The POCUS group had a shorter median LOS than the radiology-performed ultrasound group (adjusted median difference -73 min; 95% confidence interval -93.6 to -52.4 min). In the subset of patients discharged from the ED, this difference was more pronounced (adjusted median difference -89 min; 95% confidence interval -109.9 to -68.1 min).
Among children presenting to a pediatric ED with superficial skin and soft tissue infections, children receiving POCUS experienced shorter LOS compared to children receiving radiology-performed ultrasound.
即时超声检查(POCUS)在儿科急诊科(ED)越来越多地用于区分蜂窝织炎和脓肿。POCUS在成人患者的其他应用中也已显示可缩短住院时间(LOS)。
我们试图确定接受POCUS检查的皮肤和软组织感染患儿与接受放射科超声检查的患儿相比,急诊住院时间是否存在差异。
我们对2011年1月至2013年6月间到城市儿科急诊科就诊、诊断为蜂窝织炎或脓肿并接受软组织超声检查的患儿进行了一项回顾性队列研究。排除接受外科会诊、有严重内科合并症或病变位于面部、手部、足部或腹股沟的患者。我们比较了接受放射科超声检查的患儿与接受POCUS检查的患儿的急诊住院时间,并对相关临床变量进行了调整。
在3094例诊断为蜂窝织炎或脓肿的患儿中,我们确定202例接受了POCUS检查,118例接受了放射科超声检查。POCUS组的中位住院时间比放射科超声检查组短(调整后的中位差异为-73分钟;95%置信区间为-93.6至-52.4分钟)。在从急诊科出院的患者亚组中,这种差异更为明显(调整后的中位差异为-89分钟;95%置信区间为-109.9至-68.1分钟)。
在到儿科急诊科就诊的浅表皮肤和软组织感染患儿中,接受POCUS检查的患儿与接受放射科超声检查的患儿相比,住院时间更短。