Suppr超能文献

熟练投掷表现:最优理论的一项测试

Skilled Throwing Performance: A Test of the OPTIMAL Theory.

作者信息

Sertic Jacquelyn V L, Avedesian Jason M, Navalta James W

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

出版信息

Int J Exerc Sci. 2021 Apr 1;14(5):358-368. doi: 10.70252/AYOY4399. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning postulates that autonomy support (AS), enhanced expectancies (EE), and an external focus of attention (EF) facilitate improved motor learning and performance. However, its applicability to elite-level throwing athletes has not been investigated by previous literature. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the successive implementation of AS, EE, and EF factors on overhand throwing performance in elite collegiate softball athletes (14.44 ± 2.75 years of softball experience). The secondary purpose was to determine whether self-efficacy beliefs would be augmented by factor manipulation. Twenty-four participants threw softballs at a bullseye target during five blocks. The Baseline test (Block 1) was used to subsequently assign participants to either the OPTIMAL or control group. Three middle blocks (Block 2 to 4) followed with successive factor implementation for the OPTIMAL group and without instruction for the control group. The final block (Block 5) served as the Transfer test, at which time throwing distance was increased. During Blocks 2 to 4, the OPTIMAL group was given the choice between softballs (AS), a liberal definition of successful throwing performance (EE), and instructed to focus on the bullseye (EF). Self-efficacy beliefs were assessed after applying the factors and before all blocks. There were no significant differences between the groups in throwing accuracy or self-efficacy scores across all blocks. The results suggest that the OPTIMAL theory does not augment skilled throwing performance or alter self-efficacy in elite softball throwing, potentially attributed to a natural adoption of EF and previously high self-efficacy.

摘要

运动学习的最优理论假定,自主支持(AS)、增强期望(EE)和外部注意力焦点(EF)有助于改善运动学习和表现。然而,先前的文献尚未研究其在精英水平投掷运动员中的适用性。本研究的主要目的是调查AS、EE和EF因素对精英大学垒球运动员(垒球经验为14.44±2.75年)过肩投掷表现的连续实施情况。次要目的是确定因素操纵是否会增强自我效能信念。24名参与者在五个阶段向靶心目标投掷垒球。基线测试(第1阶段)随后用于将参与者分配到最优组或对照组。接下来的三个中间阶段(第2至4阶段)对最优组连续实施因素,而对照组不接受指导。最后一个阶段(第5阶段)作为迁移测试,此时投掷距离增加。在第2至4阶段,最优组可以在垒球(AS)之间进行选择,对成功投掷表现进行宽泛定义(EE),并被指示专注于靶心(EF)。在应用这些因素后和所有阶段之前评估自我效能信念。在所有阶段,两组在投掷准确性或自我效能得分方面没有显著差异。结果表明,最优理论不会提高精英垒球投掷的熟练表现或改变自我效能,这可能归因于对EF的自然采用和先前较高的自我效能。

相似文献

1
Skilled Throwing Performance: A Test of the OPTIMAL Theory.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2021 Apr 1;14(5):358-368. doi: 10.70252/AYOY4399. eCollection 2021.
2
Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Apr;71(4):824-831. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1276204. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
3
A test of optimal theory on young adolescents' standing long jump performance and motivation.
Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Aug;72:102651. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102651. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
4
Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning.
Hum Mov Sci. 2014 Oct;37:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
6
External focus and autonomy support: two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits.
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Apr;40:176-84. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.015. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
7
Optimizing Motor Learning in Older Adults.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Jan 1;79(1). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad120.
8
Onward and upward: Optimizing motor performance.
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Aug;60:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
Maximal force production requires OPTIMAL conditions.
Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Oct;73:102661. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102661. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
Autonomy Support via Instructionally Irrelevant Choice Not Beneficial for Motor Performance or Learning.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2022 Mar;93(1):64-76. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2020.1795056. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Every story has two sides: evaluating information processing and ecological dynamics perspectives of focus of attention in skill acquisition.
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 May 24;5:1176635. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1176635. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Sep 1;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.70252/EYCD6235. eCollection 2019.
2
Maximal force production requires OPTIMAL conditions.
Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Oct;73:102661. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102661. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
3
Choose your words wisely: Optimizing impacts on standardized performance testing.
Gait Posture. 2020 Jun;79:210-216. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Optimizing the penalty kick under external focus of attention and autonomy support instructions.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Nov;20(10):1378-1386. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1720829. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
5
Self-Efficacy, Flow, Affect, Worry and Performance in Elite World Cup Ski Jumping.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 17;9:1215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01215. eCollection 2018.
6
Onward and upward: Optimizing motor performance.
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Aug;60:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 30.
7
Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Apr;71(4):824-831. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1276204. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
8
Choices enhance punching performance of competitive kickboxers.
Psychol Res. 2017 Sep;81(5):1051-1058. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0790-1. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
10
External focus and autonomy support: two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits.
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Apr;40:176-84. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.015. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验