• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检验缓冲假说:英国的母乳喂养问题、中断和社会支持。

Testing the buffering hypothesis: Breastfeeding problems, cessation, and social support in the UK.

机构信息

Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

UCL Anthropology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Hum Biol. 2022 Feb;34(2):e23621. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23621. Epub 2021 May 30.

DOI:10.1002/ajhb.23621
PMID:34056792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11475338/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Physical breastfeeding problems can lead women to terminate breastfeeding earlier than planned. In high-income countries such as the UK, breastfeeding problems have been attributed to the cultural and individual "inexperience" of breastfeeding, ultimately leading to lower breastfeeding rates. Yet, cross-cultural evidence suggests breastfeeding problems still occur in contexts where breastfeeding is common, prolonged, and seen publicly. This suggests breastfeeding problems are not unusual and do not necessarily lead to breastfeeding cessation. As humans evolved to raise children cooperatively, what matters for breastfeeding continuation may be the availability of social support during the postnatal period. Here, we test the hypothesis that social support buffers mothers from the negative impact breastfeeding problems have on duration.

METHODS

We run Cox models on a sample of 565 UK mothers who completed a retrospective online survey about infant feeding and social support in 2017-2018.

RESULTS

Breastfeeding problems were important predictors of cessation; however, the direction of the effect was dependent on the problem type and type of support from a range of supporters. Helpful support for discomfort issues (blocked ducts, too much milk) was significantly associated with reduced hazards of cessation, as predicted. However, helpful support for reported milk insufficiency was assoicated with an increased hazard of cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Experiencing breastfeeding problems is the norm, but its impact may be mitigated via social support. Working from an interdisciplinary approach, our results highlight that a wide range of supporters who provide different types of support have potential to influence maternal breastfeeding experience.

摘要

目的

身体上的母乳喂养问题可能导致女性提前终止母乳喂养。在英国等高收入国家,母乳喂养问题归因于母乳喂养的文化和个体“缺乏经验”,最终导致母乳喂养率较低。然而,跨文化证据表明,在母乳喂养普遍、持续且公开的情况下,仍会出现母乳喂养问题。这表明母乳喂养问题并不罕见,不一定会导致母乳喂养的终止。由于人类进化为合作育儿,在产后期间获得社会支持可能对母乳喂养的持续时间更为重要。在这里,我们检验了这样一个假设,即社会支持可以缓冲母亲因母乳喂养问题而停止母乳喂养的负面影响。

方法

我们对 2017-2018 年期间完成婴儿喂养和社会支持在线回顾性调查的 565 名英国母亲的样本进行了 Cox 模型分析。

结果

母乳喂养问题是停止母乳喂养的重要预测因素;然而,影响的方向取决于问题的类型和来自各种支持者的支持类型。对不适问题(堵塞的乳管、奶太多)的帮助性支持与降低停止母乳喂养的风险显著相关,这与预测结果一致。然而,对报告的乳汁不足的帮助性支持与停止母乳喂养的风险增加有关。

结论

经历母乳喂养问题是正常的,但它的影响可以通过社会支持来减轻。从跨学科的方法出发,我们的研究结果强调,提供不同类型支持的各种支持者有可能影响产妇母乳喂养体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82b/11475338/05592c49d2ff/AJHB-34-e23621-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82b/11475338/d60a53de424b/AJHB-34-e23621-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82b/11475338/a11dd7e7ec8e/AJHB-34-e23621-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82b/11475338/05592c49d2ff/AJHB-34-e23621-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82b/11475338/d60a53de424b/AJHB-34-e23621-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82b/11475338/a11dd7e7ec8e/AJHB-34-e23621-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82b/11475338/05592c49d2ff/AJHB-34-e23621-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Testing the buffering hypothesis: Breastfeeding problems, cessation, and social support in the UK.检验缓冲假说:英国的母乳喂养问题、中断和社会支持。
Am J Hum Biol. 2022 Feb;34(2):e23621. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23621. Epub 2021 May 30.
2
Emotional and informational social support from health visitors and breastfeeding outcomes in the UK.卫生访视员提供的情感和信息社会支持与英国的母乳喂养结果。
Int Breastfeed J. 2023 Mar 7;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13006-023-00551-7.
3
Parenting stress in the early years - a survey of the impact of breastfeeding and social support for women in Finland and the UK.育儿压力在早期 - 对芬兰和英国母乳喂养和社会支持对女性影响的调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Sep 10;22(1):699. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05010-5.
4
Typologies of postnatal support and breastfeeding at two months in the UK.英国产后两个月的支持和母乳喂养类型学。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112791. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112791. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
Breastfeeding peer supporters and a community support group: evaluating their effectiveness.母乳喂养同伴支持者和社区支持小组:评估其有效性。
Matern Child Nutr. 2005 Apr;1(2):111-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2005.00005.x.
6
A mixed methods evaluation of peer support in Bristol, UK: mothers', midwives' and peer supporters' views and the effects on breastfeeding.英国布里斯托的同伴支持混合方法评估:母亲、助产士和同伴支持者的观点以及对母乳喂养的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Oct 20;13:192. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-192.
7
Lessons for the UK on implementation and evaluation of breastfeeding support: evidence syntheses and stakeholder engagement.英国在实施和评估母乳喂养支持方面的经验教训:证据综合和利益相关者参与。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(20):1-206. doi: 10.3310/DGTP5702.
8
The differential role of practical and emotional support in infant feeding experience in the UK.英国婴儿喂养体验中实际支持和情感支持的差异作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jun 21;376(1827):20200034. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0034. Epub 2021 May 3.
9
'Surely you're not still breastfeeding': a qualitative exploration of women's experiences of breastfeeding beyond infancy in the UK.“你肯定不再母乳喂养了吧”:对英国女性在婴儿期之后母乳喂养经历的质性探索
BMJ Open. 2020 May 26;10(5):e035199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035199.
10
Evaluation of the Healthy Start voucher scheme on maternal vitamin use and child breastfeeding: a natural experiment using data linkage.“健康起步”代金券计划对孕产妇维生素使用及儿童母乳喂养情况的评估:一项利用数据关联的自然实验
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Nov;11(11):1-101. doi: 10.3310/RTEU2107.

引用本文的文献

1
Cobenefits for Participants of a Nurse-Led Telephone-Based Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Intervention: A Multimethod Qualitative Study.基于电话的护士主导的幼儿肥胖预防干预参与者的附带益处:一项多方法定性研究。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2025 Aug;31(4):e70037. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70037.
2
Collecting real-time infant feeding and support experience: co-participatory pilot study of mobile health methodology.收集实时婴儿喂养及支持经验:移动健康方法的共同参与式试点研究
Int Breastfeed J. 2025 Apr 3;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13006-025-00707-7.
3
Helping first-time mothers establish and maintain breastfeeding: Access to someone who can provide breastfeeding advice is an important factor.

本文引用的文献

1
The differential role of practical and emotional support in infant feeding experience in the UK.英国婴儿喂养体验中实际支持和情感支持的差异作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jun 21;376(1827):20200034. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0034. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Relatively speaking? Partners' and family members' views and experiences of supporting breastfeeding: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.相对而言?伴侣和家庭成员支持母乳喂养的观点和经验:定性证据的系统评价。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jun 21;376(1827):20200033. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0033. Epub 2021 May 3.
3
Who cares for women with children? Crossing the bridge between disciplines.
帮助初产妇建立和维持母乳喂养:能够获得提供母乳喂养建议的人是一个重要因素。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 28;18(6):e0287023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287023. eCollection 2023.
4
Emotional and informational social support from health visitors and breastfeeding outcomes in the UK.卫生访视员提供的情感和信息社会支持与英国的母乳喂养结果。
Int Breastfeed J. 2023 Mar 7;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13006-023-00551-7.
谁来照顾有孩子的女性?跨越学科的桥梁。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jun 21;376(1827):20200019. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0019. Epub 2021 May 3.
4
Children are important too: juvenile playgroups and maternal childcare in a foraging population, the Agta.儿童也很重要:觅食人群阿格塔的幼儿游戏小组和母婴照护
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jun 21;376(1827):20200026. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0026. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
Early origins of socioeconomic inequalities in chronic inflammation: Evaluating the contributions of low birth weight and short breastfeeding.慢性炎症中社会经济不平等的早期起源:评估低出生体重和短母乳喂养的贡献。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;269:113592. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113592. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
6
The complex geographies of telelactation and access to community breastfeeding support in the state of Ohio.俄亥俄州远程哺乳和获得社区母乳喂养支持的复杂地理环境。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 24;15(11):e0242457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242457. eCollection 2020.
7
Subjective Environmental Experiences and Women's Breastfeeding Journeys: A Survival Analysis Using an Online Survey of UK Mothers.主观环境体验与女性母乳喂养历程:基于英国母亲在线调查的生存分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 28;17(21):7903. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217903.
8
Life history and socioecology of infancy.婴儿期的生活史与社会生态学。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020 Dec;173(4):619-629. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24145. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
9
Helpful and challenging aspects of breastfeeding in public for women living in Australia, Ireland and Sweden: a cross-sectional study.澳大利亚、爱尔兰和瑞典女性母乳喂养的有益和挑战方面:一项横断面研究。
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 May 12;15(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13006-020-00281-0.
10
Typologies of postnatal support and breastfeeding at two months in the UK: Response to comments by Harpur & Haddon.英国产后两个月的支持和母乳喂养类型学:对哈珀和哈登评论的回应。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 May;252:112944. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112944. Epub 2020 Mar 24.