Department of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH.
Institute of Sociology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz.
Psychol Rev. 2021 Jul;128(4):623-642. doi: 10.1037/rev0000291. Epub 2021 May 31.
We present an agent-based model for studying the societal implications of attitude change theories. Various psychological theories of persuasive communication at the individual level are implemented as simulation experiments. The model allows us to investigate the effects of contagion and assimilation, motivated cognition, polarity, source credibility, and idiosyncratic attitude formation. Simulations show that different theories produce different characteristic macrolevel patterns. Contagion and assimilation are central mechanisms for generating consensus, however, contagion generates a radicalized consensus. Motivated cognition causes societal polarization or the fragmentation of attitudes. Polarity and source credibility have comparatively little effect on the societal distribution of attitudes. We discuss how the simulations provide a bridge between microlevel psychological theories and the aggregated macrolevel studied by sociology. This approach enables new types of evidence for evaluating psychological theory to complement experimental approaches, thus answering calls to enhance the role of coherent and formalized theory in psychological science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
我们提出了一个基于代理的模型,用于研究态度改变理论的社会影响。各种个体层面的有说服力的沟通的心理学理论被实施为模拟实验。该模型使我们能够调查感染和同化、动机认知、极性、来源可信度和特质态度形成的影响。模拟表明,不同的理论产生不同的特征宏观模式。感染和同化是产生共识的核心机制,然而,感染会产生激进的共识。动机认知导致社会两极分化或态度的碎片化。极性和来源可信度对态度的社会分布影响相对较小。我们讨论了模拟如何在微观心理理论和社会学研究的聚合宏观水平之间架起桥梁。这种方法为评估心理学理论提供了新的证据类型,从而补充了实验方法,从而回应了加强连贯和形式化理论在心理学科学中的作用的呼吁。