The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
The Johns Hopkins Center on Aging and Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112062. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12062.
Guidelines recommend against routine breast and prostate cancer screenings in older adults with less than 10 years' life expectancy. One study using a claims-based prognostic index showed that receipt of cancer screening itself was associated with lower mortality, suggesting that the index may misclassify individuals when used to inform cancer screening, but this finding was attributed to residual confounding because the index did not account for functional status.
To examine whether cancer screening remains significantly associated with all-cause mortality in older adults after accounting for both comorbidities and functional status.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included individuals older than 65 years who were eligible for breast or prostate cancer screening and who participated in the 2004 Health and Retirement Study. Data were linked to Medicare claims from 2001 to 2015. Data analysis was conducted from January to November 2020.
A Cox model was used to estimate the association between all-cause mortality over 10 years and receipt of screening mammogram or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, adjusting for variables in a prognostic index that included age, sex, comorbidities, and functional status. Potential confounders (ie, education, income, marital status, geographic region, cognition, self-reported health, self-care, and self-perceived mortality risk) of the association between cancer screening and mortality were also tested.
The breast cancer screening cohort included 3257 women (mean [SD] age, 77.8 [7.5] years); the prostate cancer screening cohort included 2085 men (mean [SD] age, 76.1 [6.8] years). Receipt of screening mammogram was associated with lower hazard of all-cause mortality after accounting for all index variables (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.74). A weaker, but still statistically significant, association was found for screening PSA (aHR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99). None of the potential confounders attenuated the association between screening and mortality except for cognition, which attenuated the aHR for mammogram from 0.67 (95% CI, 0.60-0.74) to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64-0.82) and the aHR for PSA from 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78-0.99) to 0.92 (95% CI, 0.80-1.05), making PSA screening no longer statistically significant.
In this study, cognition attenuated the observed association between cancer screening and mortality among older adults. These findings suggest that existing mortality prediction algorithms may be missing important variables that are associated with receipt of cancer screening and long-term mortality. Relying solely on algorithms to determine cancer screening may misclassify individuals as having limited life expectancy and stop screening prematurely. Screening decisions need to be individualized and not solely dependent on life expectancy prediction.
指南建议,对于预期寿命不足 10 年的老年人,不常规进行乳腺癌和前列腺癌筛查。一项基于索赔的预后指数研究表明,接受癌症筛查本身与死亡率降低相关,这表明该指数在用于告知癌症筛查时可能会错误分类个体,但这一发现归因于残余混杂,因为该指数没有考虑到功能状态。
在考虑到合并症和功能状态后,检查癌症筛查是否仍然与老年人的全因死亡率显著相关。
设计、地点和参与者:本队列研究纳入了年龄大于 65 岁、有资格接受乳腺癌或前列腺癌筛查且参加了 2004 年健康与退休研究的个体。数据与 2001 年至 2015 年的医疗保险索赔相关联。数据分析于 2020 年 1 月至 11 月进行。
使用 Cox 模型估计了 10 年内全因死亡率与接受筛查乳房 X 光检查或前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测之间的关联,调整了包括年龄、性别、合并症和功能状态在内的预后指数中的变量。还测试了癌症筛查与死亡率之间关联的潜在混杂因素(即教育、收入、婚姻状况、地理区域、认知、自我报告的健康状况、自我护理和自我感知的死亡风险)。
乳腺癌筛查队列包括 3257 名女性(平均[SD]年龄,77.8[7.5]岁);前列腺癌筛查队列包括 2085 名男性(平均[SD]年龄,76.1[6.8]岁)。在考虑到所有指数变量后,接受筛查乳房 X 光检查与全因死亡率的风险降低相关(校正后的危险比[HR],0.67;95%CI,0.60-0.74)。对 PSA 筛查的相关性较弱,但仍具有统计学意义(校正 HR,0.88;95%CI,0.78-0.99)。除认知能力外,没有任何潜在混杂因素会削弱筛查与死亡率之间的关联,认知能力会使乳房 X 光检查的校正 HR 从 0.67(95%CI,0.60-0.74)降至 0.73(95%CI,0.64-0.82),PSA 检查的校正 HR 从 0.88(95%CI,0.78-0.99)降至 0.92(95%CI,0.80-1.05),使 PSA 筛查不再具有统计学意义。
在这项研究中,认知能力削弱了癌症筛查与老年人死亡率之间的观察到的关联。这些发现表明,现有的死亡率预测算法可能遗漏了与癌症筛查和长期死亡率相关的重要变量。仅仅依靠算法来确定癌症筛查可能会错误分类预期寿命有限的个体,并过早停止筛查。筛查决策需要个体化,而不仅仅依赖于预期寿命预测。